Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study

Forsth P, Michaelsson K, Sanden B (2013) Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients. Bone Joint J 95-B:960–965. doi: 95-B/7/960 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.30776 [doi]

Forsth P, Olafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstrom F, Fritzell P, Ohagen P, Michaelsson K, Sanden B (2016) A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513721

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH, Lee HY (2011) A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4–L5 spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E172–E178

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Hartl R, Bisson E, Park KB, Shrime MG (2018) Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Global Spine J 8:784–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218770769

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sharif S, Shaikh Y, Bajamal AH, Costa F, Zileli M (2020) Fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: WFNS spine committee recommendations. World Neurosurg X 7:100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100077

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TA, Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Anvar M, Rekeland F, Brox JI, Franssen E, Weber C, Solberg TK, Furunes H, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K (2022) Comparison of 3 different minimally invasive surgical techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 5:e224291. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4291

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elmqvist E, Lindhagen L, Forsth P (2022) No benefit with preservation of midline structures in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: results from the National Swedish Spine Registry 2-Year Post-Op. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 47:531–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004313

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hermansen E, Romild UK, Austevoll IM, Solberg T, Storheim K, Brox JI, Hellum C, Indrekvam K (2017) Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Eur Spine J 26:420–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4643-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steurer J, Roner S, Gnannt R, Hodler J (2011) Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:175

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hermansen E, Myklebust T, Weber C, Brisby H, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Brox JI, Grundnes O, Rekeland F, Solberg T, Franssen E, Indrekvam K (2023) Postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area as an association for outcome after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiological results from the NORDSTEN-spinal stenosis trial. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 48:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004565

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Romild UK, Rekeland F, Solberg T, Storheim K, Grundnes O, Aaen J, Brox JI, Hellum C, Indrekvam K (2017) Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1491-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Indrekvam K, Bånerud IF, Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Rekeland F, Guddal MH, Solberg TK, Brox JI, Hellum C, Storheim K (2023) The Norwegian degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis (NORDSTEN) study: study overview, organization structure and study population. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07827-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TA, Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Anvar M, Rekeland F, Brox JI, Franssen E, Weber C, Solberg T, Haug KJ, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K (2020) Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study. Eur Spine J 29:2254–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06499-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Banitalebi H, Espeland A, Anvar M, Hermansen E, Hellum C, Brox JI, Myklebust TA, Indrekvam K, Brisby H, Weber C, Aaen J, Austevoll IM, Grundnes O, Negard A (2022) Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04949-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aaen J, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust T, Banitalebi H, Anvar M, Brox JI, Weber C, Solberg T, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K, Hermansen E (2021) Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07051-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust T, Anvar M, Weber C, Solberg T, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K, Hermansen E (2022) The association between preoperative MRI findings and clinical improvement in patients included in the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07317-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Banitalebi H, Espeland A, Anvar M, Hermansen E, Hellum C, Brox JI, Myklebust T, Indrekvam K, Brisby H, Weber C, Aaen J, Austevoll IM, Grundnes O, Negård A (2022) Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04949-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karlsson T, Försth P, Skorpil M, Pazarlis K, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B (2022) Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up. Bone Jt J 104-B:1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.104b12.Bjj-2022-0340.R1

Article  Google Scholar 

Danielson B, Willén J (2001) Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2601–2606. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112010-00015

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danielson BI, Willén J, Gaulitz A, Niklason T, Hansson TH (1998) Axial loading of the spine during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol (Stockholm, Sweden: 1987) 39:604–611. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841859809175484

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Fang X, Li J, Liu L, Zhang Y, Tang Z, Zhang J (2023) Axial loading lumbar magnetic resonance imaging with a new device in asymptomatic individuals. Quant Imaging Med Surg 13:58–65. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-283

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fang X, Li J, Wang L, Liu L, Lv W, Tang Z, Gao D (2023) Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Radiol 33:3200–3210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09447-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif