Work-related road traffic accidents: emergence of new modes of personal journey. Analysis based on data from a register of road traffic accidents

Abstract

Introduction: According to the 2018-2019 People Mobility Survey, work-related journeys (commuting and on-duty journeys) account for approximately 25% of all journeys. The use of non-motorized (nm) and motorized (m) personal mobility devices (PMDs) has steadily increased since their introduction into the French market in the last decade. Objective: This study aimed to describe the characteristics of work-related road accidents and their evolution since the introduction of new PMDs in France. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the Rh&ocircne Road Trauma Registry. Data were collected from 2015 to 2020. We included the data for the victims aged 18-70 years who were injured in work-related accidents. Results: We identified 11,296 individuals aged 18-70 years who experienced work-related road accidents. An injury report was provided for a total of 11,277 patients. A total of 546 passengers and 78 drivers of other motorized vehicles (buses/trams, construction equipment, and tractors) were excluded from the analysis. Seven patients died at the time of the accident, and seven died after hospitalization. Of the 10,653 (94.4%) victims, there were pedestrians (5.1%), or drivers of bicycles (16.9%), scooters (3.8%), other PMDs (roller blades, skateboards, monowheels, gyropods, and hoverboards; 0.4%), motorized two-wheeler (21.4%), car (45.3%), and truck (1.5%). More than half of the scooter drivers and 80% of other PMD-drivers were men. More than 60% of other PMD-drivers and 53% of scooter drivers were under 34 years of age. Most scooter accidents occurred during commuting (95.6%). Sixty-five percent of the scooter- and 50% of other PMD-accidents did not have antagonists. Overall, one-quarter of the victims experienced accidents without antagonists. Most scooter users had injuries to their upper limbs (59.2%), lower limbs (46.8%), face (21.2%) or head (17.9%). Discussion: Most accidents were of low or moderate severity (97.5%; Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale, MAIS score < 3). The frequency and severity of injuries among scooter- and other PMD users were similar. Scooter antagonists were rarely observed in pedestrian accidents (12/575). Most scooter- and other PMD-accidents did not have antagonists. Conclusion: Many head injuries could be prevented with more widespread use of helmets, among scooter- and other PMD users and bicycle users.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by The French National Public Health Agency (Sant&eacute publique France) and The Rh&ocircne-Alpes retirement and occupational health funds (Carsat Rh&ocircne Alpes).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Rh&ocircne Road Trauma Registry has been qualified by the Registry Evaluation Committee (CER) and it has been approved by the National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif