Preregistered analytic plan: the gut microbiome and acute kidney injury in sepsis

Abstract

Overview: We here share a pre-registered analytic plan for a matched case-control study nested in a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients with suspected sepsis. We will compare gut microbiota (measured near the time of admission) among patients with sepsis who do and do not develop sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Rationale: Sepsis afflicts nearly 50 million people annually, and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication that contributes to morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Despite the clinical significance of AKI in sepsis, we still do not understand why some patients with sepsis develop AKI while others do not. The gut microbiome has been implicated in other clinical features and sequelae of sepsis, but to date has not been studied in sepsis-induced AKI. Objective: To determine whether gut microbiota predict AKI in patients with suspected sepsis. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that among patients with suspected sepsis, gut bacterial density and identity (at the time of admission) predict the onset and severity of AKI. Study design: We will perform a matched case-control study nested in an observational cohort. The cohort includes patients admitted to the University of Michigan in 2016-2020 with suspected sepsis. We will divide patients into cohorts that did and did not develop AKI. We will derive matched cohorts based on relevant clinical covariates. We will characterize their gut microbiota using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of rectal swabs obtained within 24 hours of AKI onset. We will compare admission gut microbiota across these matched cohorts to test our primary hypothesis.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board has approved this study (HUM00222404). The same review body deemed the study exempt from needing consent under 45 CFR section 46, category 4 (secondary use of identifiable data).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif