Harvey LA, Glinsky JV, Bowden JL. The effectiveness of 22 commonly administered physiotherapy interventions for people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:914–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harvey LA, Ben M, Glinsky JV, Spooren A, Roberts S, Chen L, et al. The early and intensive motor training trial for people with spinal cord injuries: description of the intervention. Spinal Cord. 2023;61:600–607.

Harvey LA, Glinsky JV, Chu J, Herbert RD, Liu H, Jan S, et al. Early and intensive motor training to enhance neurological recovery in people with spinal cord injury: trial protocol. Spinal Cord. 2023;61:521–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ferreira ML, Herbert RD, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, Ostelo RW, Nascimento DP, et al. A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:253–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barrett B, Brown D, Mundt M, Brown R. Sufficiently Important Difference: Expanding the Framework of Clinical Significance. Med Decis Mak. 2005;25:250–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barrett B, Harahan B, Brown D, Zhang Z, Brown R. Sufficiently important difference for common cold: severity reduction. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:216–23.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ferreira ML, Herbert RD. What does ‘clinically important’ really mean? Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:229–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bye EA, Harvey LA, Gambhir A, Kataria C, Glinsky JV, Bowden JL, et al. Strength training for partially paralysed muscles in people with recent spinal cord injury: a within-participant randomised controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:460–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glinsky J, Harvey L, Korten M, Drury C, Chee S, Gandevia SC. Short-term progressive resistance exercise may not be effective at increasing wrist strength in people with tetraplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:103–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Galea MP, Spinal Cord Injury Physical Activity Hands On Trial C. Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury (‘Hands On’): a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2016;62:88–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman A, Deforge D, et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66:484–93.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang JF, Musselman KE, Livingstone D, Brunton K, Hendricks G, Hill D, et al. Repetitive mass practice or focused precise practice for retraining walking after incomplete spinal cord injury? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:314–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boswell-Ruys CL, Harvey LA, Barker JJ, Ben M, Middleton JW, Lord SR. Training unsupported sitting in people with chronic spinal cord injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:138–43.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amatachaya S, Khuna L, Thaweewannakij T. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the five times sit-to-stand test in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: A six-month prospective cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2022;0:1–10.

Corallo V, Torre M, Ferrara G, Guerra F, Nicosia G, Romanelli E, et al. What do spinal cord injury patients think of their improvement? A study of the minimal clinically important difference of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:508–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kalsi-Ryan S, Balbinot G, Wang JZ, Abel R, Bolliger M, Curt A, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension Version 1 in acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39:1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marino RJ, Sinko R, Bryden A, Backus D, Chen D, Nemunaitis GA, et al. Comparison of responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP). Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018;24:227–38.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Graco M, Holland AE, Berlowitz DJ. How much matters? Exploring the minimum important difference for sleepiness in spinal cord injury. Sleep Med. 2019;64:S135–S6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Musselman KE. Clinical significance testing in rehabilitation research: what, why, and how? Phys Ther Rev. 2014;12:287–96.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sato HM, Miyata KP, Yoshikawa KP, Chiba SR, Mizukami MP. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord injury (TASS). J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;1–9.

Sobreira M, Almeida MP, Gomes A, Lucas M, Oliveira A, Marques A. Minimal clinically important differences for measures of pain, lung function, fatigue, and functionality in spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2021;101:1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cook JA, Hislop J, Altman DG, Fayers P, Briggs AH, Ramsay CR, et al. Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers. Trials. 2015;16:1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:109–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jayadevappa R, Cook R, Chhatre S. Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;89:188–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus EJ, Kavchak AE. Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20:160–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rupp R, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Graves DE, Guest J, Jones L, et al. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021;27:1–22.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guyatt G, Osoba D, Wu A, Wyrwich K, Norman G. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malec JF, Ketchum JM. A standard method for determining the minimal clinically important difference for rehabilitation measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:1090–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McNamara RJ, Elkins MR, Ferreira ML, Spencer LM, Herbert RD. Smallest worthwhile effect of land-based and water-based pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2015;1:1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Christiansen DH, de Vos Andersen NB, Poulsen PH, Ostelo RW. The smallest worthwhile effect of primary care physiotherapy did not differ across musculoskeletal pain sites. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;101:44–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Franco MR, Howard K, Sherrington C, Rose J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. Smallest worthwhile effect of exercise programs to prevent falls among older people: estimates from benefit-harm trade-off and discrete choice methods. Age Ageing. 2016;45:806–12.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferreira M. Research Note: The smallest worthwhile effect of a health intervention. J Physiother. 2018;64:272–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harvey LA. A minimally important treatment effect is a key but illusive concept. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:83–4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herbert RD. How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes. Aust J Physiother. 2000;46:229–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khorasanizadeh M, Yousefifard M, Eskian M, Lu Y, Chalangari M, Harrop JS, et al. Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30:1–17.

Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician assigned visual analog pain scores. Academic Emerg Med. 1996;3:142–6.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Burback D, Molnar FJ, St. John P, Man-Son-Hing M. Key methodological features of randomised controlled trials of Alzheimer’s Disease therapy. Minimal clinicically important difference, sample size and trial duration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10:534–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar