Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 15(6):602–617. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A(3):607–624

Mehren C, Heider F, Siepe CJ et al (2017) Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J 26(9):2441–2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5204-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Delamarter RB, Zigler J (2013) Five-years reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(9):711–717. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182797592.

Loumeau TP, Darden BV, Kesman TJ et al (2016) A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eur Spine J 25(7):2263–2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4431-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Skeppholm M, Lindgren L, Henriques T et al (2015) The Discover artifical disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy – a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine J 15(6):1284–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.039

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim T-H, et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(22): 2432–2434. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003

Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R et al (2002) Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 96(1 Suppl):17–21. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2002.96.1.0017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cho D-Y, Liau W-R, Lee W-Y, et al (2002) Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51(6):1343–1349; discussion 1349–1350

Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al (2004) Long-Term Follow-Up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200404000-0000-1

Hey HWD, Hong CC, Long AS et al (2013) Is hybrid surgery of the cervical spine a good balance between fusion and arthroplasty? Pilot results from a single surgeon series. Eur Spine J 22(1):116–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2486-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lu VM, Zhang L, Scherman DB et al (2017) Treating multi-level cervical disc disease with hybrid surgery compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26(1):285–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4820-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al (2006) Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(24):2802–2806. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245852

Pehlivanoglu T, Wuertz-Kozak K, Heider F, et al (2019) Clinical and radiographic outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(20):1403–1411. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003079

Mehren C, Wuertz-Kozak K, Sauer D, et al (2019) Implant design and the anchoring mechanism influence the incidence of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement at 2-year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(21):1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003098

Barbagallo GMV, Assietti R, Corbino L, et al (2009) Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques? Eur Spine J 18 Suppl1(Suppl1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0978-9

Schulze M, Trautwein F, Vordemvenne T et al (2011) A method to perform spinal motion analysis from functional X-ray images. J Biomech 44(9):1740–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.040

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arts M, Torensma B, Wolfs J (2020) Porous titanium cervical interbody fusion device in the treatment of degenerative cervical radiculopathy; 1-year results of a prospective controlled trial. Spine J 20(7):1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peppers TA, Bullard DE, Vanichkachorn JS et al (2017) Prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of an allogenic bone matrix containing stem cells (Trinity Evolution® Viable Cellular Bone Matrix) in patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0564-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Noordhoek I, Koning MT, Jacobs WCH et al (2018) Incidence and clinical relevance of cage subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160(4):873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3490-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ament JD, Vokshoor A, Yee R et al (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of silicon nitride and biomaterial modulus as it relates to subsidence risk in spinal fusion surgery. N Am Spine Soc J 9(12):100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100168

Article  Google Scholar 

Arts MP, Wolfs JFC, Corbin TP (2017) Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomizes controlled trial. Eur Spine J 26:2372–2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5079-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bohlmann HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, et al (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1298–1307. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199309000-00005

DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT, Vossel KA, et al (2000) Anterior cervical plating reverses load transfer through multilevel strut-grafts. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(7):783–795. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200004010-00005

DiAngelo DJ, Robertson JT, Metcal NH et al (2003) Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):314–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-2003080000-00002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee S-B, Cho K-S, Kim J-Y et al (2012) Hybrid surgery of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease: review of the literature and clinical results. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52(5):452–458. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.5.452

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boddapati V, Lee NJ, Mathew J et al (2020) Hybrid anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: an analysis of short-term complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Global Spine J 11(8):1183–1189. https://doi.org/10.1172/2192568220941453

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang J, Meng F, Ding Y, et al (2020) Comprehensive analysis of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in cervical diseases: a meta-analysis. Medicine 99(5):e19055. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019055

MacDowall A, Skeppholm M, Robinson Y, et al (2018) Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 28(3):227–235. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.SPINE1732

Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN (2013) Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 18(2):154–160. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon DH, et al (2009) Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(11):1153–1159 (discussion 1160–1161). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9d39

Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambren HO et al (2004) Sagittal alignement and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 17(6):E14. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.17.6.14

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Martino A, Papalia R, Albo E, et al (2015) Cervical spine alignement in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective? Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 7):810–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4258-6

Mayer F, Heider F, Haasters F, et al (2022) Radiological and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with an innovative 3D printed cellular titanium cage filled with vertebral bone marrow. Biomed Res Int 6339910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6339910. eCollection 2022

Mehren C, Heider F, Sauer D, et al (2019) Clinical and radiological outcome of a new total cervical disc replacement design. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(4):E202–E210. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002799

Liu Y, Qi M, Chen H et al (2012) Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21:2428–2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2323-y

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar