Ultrasonic Texture Analysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Background: Current risk stratification tools for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have limitations, particularly in predicting mortality. This study utilizes cardiac ultrasound radiomics (i.e., ultrasomics) to risk stratify AMI patients when predicting all cause mortality. Methods: The study included 197 patients: a) retrospective internal cohort (n=155) of non ST elevation myocardial infarction (n=63) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (n=92) patients, and b) external cohort from the multicenter Door To Unload in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction [DTU STEMI] Pilot Trial (n=42). Echocardiography images of apical 2, 3, and 4 chamber were processed through an automated deep learning pipeline to extract ultrasomic features. Unsupervised machine learning (topological data analysis) generated AMI clusters followed by a supervised classifier to generate individual predicted probabilities. Validation included assessing the incremental value of predicted probabilities over the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score 2.0 to predict 1 year all cause mortality in the internal cohort and infarct size in the external cohort. Results: Three phenogroups were identified: Cluster A (high risk), Cluster B (intermediate risk), and Cluster C (low risk). Cluster A patients had decreased LV ejection fraction (P=0.004) and global longitudinal strain (P=0.027) and increased mortality at 1 year (log rank P=0.049). Ultrasomics features alone (C Index: 0.74 vs. 0.70, P=0.039) and combined with global longitudinal strain (C Index: 0.81 vs. 0.70, P<0.001) increased prediction of mortality beyond the GRACE 2.0 score. In the DTU STEMI clinical trial, Cluster A was associated with larger infarcts size (>10% LV mass, P=0.003), compared to remaining clusters. Conclusions: Ultrasomics based phenogroup clustering, augmented by TDA and supervised machine learning, provides a novel approach for AMI risk stratification.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Sengupta is a consultant for RCE Technologies, Echo IQ. Dr. Yanamala is an advisor to Turnkey Learning, LLC and Turnkey Learning (P) Ltd, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. All other authors have no reported disclosures relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by: NSF: # 2125872

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work (#Pro2023001660).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif