Study Design

The study design was randomized controlled trial.

Place and Time of the Study

The study was conducted in the psychiatry clinic of Turgut Özal Medical Centre, İnönü University, in Turkey, between September 2021 and December 2022.

The psychiatry clinic has a capacity of 52 beds. The cases of anxiety disorder, mood disorder, psychosis, related disorders, and substance use disorder are treated in the clinic. A total of 45 healthcare professionals on staff, including 12 nurses, 7 faculty members, 13 assistants, and 13 other staff members, work in this clinic. There is a library, garden, table tennis board, sports garden, and hobby room for patients in the Psychiatry Clinic of Turgut Özal Medical Centre. In clinics, patients are subjected to regular psychiatric examinations and participate in interviews and group therapies with a psychologist. At the same time, psychiatric nurses working in the clinic write their daily observations about the patients in observation reports and report them to the physicians. Therefore, if the patient has a psychiatric problem in addition to addiction, it is stated in the clinical reports and treatment.

Population and Sample

The population of the study consisted of individuals diagnosed with substance use disorders in the psychiatry clinic of Turgut Özal Medical Centre. Based on hospital records, there were 200 individuals with substance use disorders who were treated in the psychiatry clinic in 2021–2022. One hundred thirty-five out of 200 individuals with substance use disorders used only cannabis, and 27 out of 200 individuals with substance use disorders have no diagnosis of an additional psychiatric disorder. It was obtained from the records of the patients that they only used cannabis and did not have an additional diagnosis of mental illness. The sample size was calculated for 108 individuals. The sample size determined by power analysis was calculated as at least 30 individuals for each group and 60 individuals in total (30 in experimental groups, 30 in control groups), assuming that the mean score of being affected by cannabis use, which was 37.83 (standard deviation 31) in the group who abused cannabis, would decrease by 5 points, at an error level of 5%, a two-way significance level, a confidence interval of 95%, and an ability to represent the population of 80% (Kavak Budak et al., 2021). Considering that there would be losses in the research, 70 patients (35 experimental, 35 control) were interviewed. Three patients from the experimental group stated that they gave up participating in the training after the preliminary tests were carried out, and two patients reported that they could not spare time for the training hours and days. Two patients in the control group changed the city they lived in, and three patients were assigned to another city for work reasons. The research was completed with 60 patients, 30 in the experimental group, and 30 in the control group (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Research consort flow chart

Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria

Being under 18 years of age

Having a comorbid psychiatric diagnosis (psychotic disorder, personality disorder, depression, etc.)

Being in their period of substance deprivation

Having communication problems

Having previously or currently participate in any mindfulness programme

Randomization

Randomization list for assigning patients to groups MedCalc version 18.11.3 made using. Guided by the clinician, who meet the inclusion criteria, agree to participate in the study, and routinely patients receiving treatment (similar drug therapy) are listed in the order of referral. Equal distribution according to socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education level, working status, people living with, status of having children, cannabis starting age, getting treatment to quit cannabis) was taken into account in the randomization of the experimental and control groups. The randomization number obtained from MedCalc of the number received by the patient. The last part of the list indicates that the patient is in the experimental or control group has determined. Patients were not told which group they were in.

Data Collection ToolsDescriptive Characteristics Form

This form was prepared by the researcher upon the literature review and consists of a total of ten questions including the socio-demographic characteristics of the patients.

Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

Hollon and Kendall developed the questionnaire in 1980 (Hollon & Kendal, 1984). Şahin and Şahin conducted the second validity and reliability study in 1992 (Şahin & Şahin, 1992). It requires a scoring on a 5-point Likert scale. All items are scored straight. Total score ranges between 30 and 150. A score of 67 and above indicates a high level of negative automatic thoughts. The Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient of the questionnaire was determined as 0.93 (Şahin & Şahin, 1992). In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was found to be 0.94.

Morisky Medication Adherence Scale

Morisky, Green, and Levine developed the scale in 1986 (Morisky et al., 1986). Yılmaz conducted the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale in 2004 (Yılmaz, 2004). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale ranges between 0.64 and 0.96. The scale consists of four questions to measure medication adherence. The questions are answered as “yes/no”. If the answers to all questions are “no”, medication adherence is rated as high (4 points); if the answer to one or two questions is “yes”, medication adherence is rated as moderate (between 2 and 3 points); and if the answer to three or four questions is “yes”, medication adherence is rated as low (between 0 and 1 point) (Yılmaz, 2004). In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.92.

Data Collection

The data were collected in a private room in the clinic by the researcher using face-to-face interview method. Pretest forms (Descriptive Characteristics Form, Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale) and posttest forms (Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale) were applied in the experimental and control groups. The researcher distributed the forms to the patients, and the patients filled out the forms themselves. The researcher collected the completed forms. It took approximately 15 min to complete the data collection tools.

Nursing Intervention

The researcher who applied the mindfulness training attended the training on “Mindfulness and Its Use in Therapeutic Process” provided by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zümra Atalay on 29 April 2018 and received its certificate.

The individuals in the experimental group were informed about mindfulness-based psychoeducation, and psychoeducation days were set. The individuals in the experimental group were divided into three groups of ten people. The psychoeducation programme was provided twice a week (eight sessions) as group education over 4 weeks. Each session lasted for approximately 40 min. No intervention was applied to the control group. Patients coming to the clinic were first included in the experimental group. After reaching the number in the experimental group, the control group was reached. In both groups, 15 days were waited for the posttest after the pretest. The individuals in the control and experimental groups continued their medication, education and routine practices, in the clinic during this period.

Mindfulness-based Psychoeducation Sessions

Session 1: The technique of meeting with mindfulness allowed the group members to introduce themselves to one another during the session. According to this technique, each person paired up with the patient next to him/her within the given time frame and explained themselves only to the person with whom they are paired. When the time was up, everyone took turns introducing the person they were paired up with to the group, and the introduction was completed in this way. The group members were asked to share their experiences with the practice.

Session 2: During this session, they were informed about addiction, substance use disorder, and cannabis abuse and tried to make them recognise their bodies with mindfulness exercises.

Session 3: This session involved a raisin practice to explore mindfulness. Breathing and body meditation practices were realised. They were told to notice the sounds that they hear from inside and outside with their senses during the practice. This allowed them to accept what was going on in their inner world and their surroundings as what they were. The patients were told to be aware of themselves while performing their daily activities, and mindfulness breathing exercises were assigned as homework.

Session 4: This session was based on exploring their bodies, and the patients did body meditation. The body meditation focused on the body. The session tried to raise mindfulness and alleviate stress in daily life with a habit-breaker: spending some time in nature.

Session 5: The causes of anger in patients and methods of coping with anger were discussed. They were informed about anger and coping strategies. The meditation on facing difficulties was practised. This meditation enabled the patient to develop the ability to face the difficulties occasionally encountered in daily life. A letter to the self-habit breaker made the patient aware of his/her own feelings and thoughts.

Session 6: The patients were made to do mindfulness breathing exercises and breathing meditation. This meditation was intended to teach coping with difficult circumstances and new coping strategies. The habit breaker “going for a walk” was used to raise mindfulness and reduce stress in daily life.

Session 7: The patients were told about the causes of stress and coping strategies. It aimed to alleviate the patient’s stress by increasing their joy in life. The patients did the treasure of pleasure meditation. They were enabled to use their whole consciousness to focus on extremely simple pleasures such as the warmth of the hands or the taste of the favourite food, thus trying to increase the joy of life.

Session 8: The effectiveness of the programme was assessed. What they learned were reinforced. Concerning the whole training, the group members were asked to evaluate themselves and the programme (Table 1).

Table 1 Mindfulness-based psychoeducation programmeStatistical Analysis

The SPSS 25.0 for Windows software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistically analysis of the data. Before the analysis, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was run to assess the compatibility of the scales for normal distribution. Percentage distribution, mean, Pearson chi-square, independent samples t-test, and paired t-test were applied to assess the normally distributed data.

Ethical Considerations

Approval from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Inonu University (IRB NO: 2018/10–15) and then legal permission from the related institutions were obtained to conduct the study. The participants were informed about the aim of the study, and then their questions were responded. Afterwards, their verbal and written consents were obtained. After the training given to the experimental group was completed, patients in the control group were also given 8 weeks of training.

Findings

It can be asserted that the total mean score of the individuals in the control and experimental groups in the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire in the pretest was high when the total mean score of the scale was taken into consideration (30–150). Upon intra-group and inter-group comparison of the control and experimental groups in terms of total mean score of the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, no statistically significant difference was found in the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire total mean scores of the control group in the pretest and posttest, whereas a statistically significant difference was found between the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire total mean scores of the experimental group in the pretest and posttest (p < 0.05). There was a decrease in the total mean score of the Negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire in the posttest in the experimental group compared to the control group (Tables 2 and 3). In the experimental group, negative automatic thoughts decreased by approximately 31 points in the posttest compared to the pretest, while in the control group, negative automatic thoughts increased by approximately 1 point in the posttest compared to the pretest.

Table 2 Descriptive characteristics of the control and experimental groupsTable 3 Comparison of the pretest and posttest negative automatic thoughts scale total score mean of the individuals in the experimental and control groups (n = 60)

When the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale total mean scores of the control and experimental groups in the pretest were taken into consideration (0–1 [low], 2–3 [moderate], and 4 [high]), it was determined that their medication adherence was at a moderate level. Upon intra-group and inter-group comparison of the control and experimental groups in terms of total mean score of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, no statistically significant difference was found in the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale total mean scores of the control group in the pretest and posttest, whereas a statistically significant difference was found in the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale total mean score of the experimental group in the pretest and posttest (p < 0.05). There was a decrease in the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale total mean score in the posttest in the experimental group compared to the control group (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of the pretest and posttest Morisky Medication Adherence Scale total score mean of the individuals in the experimental and control groups (n = 60)