Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.
Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):567–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026.
Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(7):CD006375. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
Keltie K, Elneil S, Monga A, et al. Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8 year study of 92,246 women. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11821-w.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dyer O. Johnson and Johnson faces lawsuit over vaginal mesh devices. BMJ. 2016;353:i3045. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3045.
Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association. Joint report on the terminology for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:465–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04237-0.
Blaivas JG, Jacobs BZ. Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of complicated stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1991;145(6):1214–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38580-4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ghoniem GM, Rizk DEE. Renaissance of the autologous pubovaginal sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(2):177–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3521-2.
Plagakis S, Tse V. The autologous pubovaginal fascial sling: an update in 2019. Lower Urinary Tract Sympt. 2020;12(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12281.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:(n71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Grigoryan B, Kasyan G, Pushkar D. Autologous slings versus other surgical methods in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023412868. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023412868.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 12 Dec 2022.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
Leow JJ, Gurbani C, Yeow S, Bang S. Autologous pubovaginal sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a patient with high risk of mesh erosion. Urology. 2020;143:266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.031.
Jia X, Wang R, Hall C, Flynn MK. Cost-effectiveness analysis: autologous rectus fascial sling versus retropubic midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023;29(2):104–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001292.
Sharifiaghdas F, Nasiri M, Mirzaei M, Narouie B. Mini sling (Ophira) versus pubovaginal sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a medium-term follow-up. Prague Med Rep. 2015;116(3):210–8. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2015.60.
Al-Azzawi IS. The first Iraqi experience with the rectus fascia sling and transobturator tape for female stress incontinence: a randomised trial. Arab J Urol. 2014;12(3):204–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2014.04.004.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Amaro JL, Yamamoto H, Kawano PR, Barros G, Gameiro MO, Agostinho AD. Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after autologous fascial sling and tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective randomized trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35(1):60–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382009000100010.
Guerrero K, Watkins A, Emery S, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two autologous fascial sling techniques for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: short, medium and long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(11):1263–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0307-y.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guerrero KL, Emery SJ, Wareham K, Ismail S, Watkins A, Lucas MG. A randomised controlled trial comparing TVT, Pelvicol and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJOG. 2010;117(12):1493–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02696.x.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Khan ZA, Nambiar A, Morley R, Chapple CR, Emery SJ, Lucas MG. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape, xenograft and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int. 2015;115(6):968–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12851.
Sharifiaghdas F, Mortazavi N. Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up. Med Princ Pract. 2008;17(3):209–14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000117794.
Sharma JB, Deoghare MK, Bhatla N, et al. A comparative study of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:349–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.062.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Silva-Filho AL, Cândido EB, Noronha A, Triginelli SA. Comparative study of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;273(5):288–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0083-1.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wadie BS, Edwan A, Nabeeh AM. Autologous fascial sling vs polypropylene tape at short-term followup: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2005;174(3):990–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000169492.96167.fe.
Dogan S. Comparison of autologous rectus fascia and synthetic sling methods of transobturator mid-urethral sling in urinary stress incontinence. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23278. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23278.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kilinc MF, Yildiz Y, Hascicek AM, Doluoglu OG, Tokat E. Long-term postoperative follow-up results of transobturator autologous rectus fascial sling versus transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes for female stress urinary incontinence: randomized controlled clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(1):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24813.
Tcherniakovsky M, Fernandes CE, Bezerra CA, Del Roy CA, Wroclawski ER. Comparative results of two techniques to treat stress urinary incontinence: synthetic transobturator and aponeurotic slings. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(8):961–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0880-3.
Elsersy MA. Tension-free transobturator vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia transobturator vaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a prospective clinical study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1174–9. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171380.
Wadie BS, Mansour A, El-Hefnawy AS, Nabeeh A, Khair AA. Minimum 2-year follow-up of mid-urethral slings, effect on quality of life, incontinence impact and sexual function. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(12):1485–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1216-z.
Bai SW, Sohn WH, Chung DJ, Park JH, Kim SK. Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91(3):246–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.023.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12:55–61.
ICS standards. Retrieved from https://www.ics.org/members/shop/icsstandards2023. 2023.
Athanasopoulos A, Gyftopoulos K, McGuire EJ. Efficacy and preoperative prognostic factors of autologous fascia rectus sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2011;78(5):1034–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.069.
Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):71.e1–27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.030.
Cubuk A, Yanaral F, Sahan A, et al. Modified autologous transobturator tape surgery—a prospective comparison with transobturator tape surgery. Urology. 2020;146:72–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.018.
Parker WP, Gomelsky A, Padmanabhan P. Autologous fascia pubovaginal slings after prior synthetic anti-incontinence procedures for recurrent incontinence: a multi-institutional prospective comparative analysis to de novo autologous slings assessing objective and subjective cure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(5):604–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22759.
Maher CF, O’Reilly BA, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter P. Pubovaginal sling versus transurethral Macroplastique for stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2005;112(6):797–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00547.x.
留言 (0)