Volders D, Bols A, Haspeslagh M, Coenegrachts K. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology. 2013;269(2):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Solomon J, Marin D, Roy Choudhury K, Patel B, Samei E. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm. Radiology. 2017;284(3):777–787. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161736

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2055–2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4571-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koetzier LR, Mastrodicasa D, Szczykutowicz TP, et al. Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects. Radiology. 2023;306(3):e221257. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221257

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh R, Digumarthy SR, Muse VV, et al. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(3):566–573. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21809

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng L, Xu X, Zeng W, et al. Deep learning trained algorithm maintains the quality of half-dose contrast-enhanced liver computed tomography images: Comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction: Study for the application of deep learning noise reduction technology in low dose. Eur J Radiol. 2021;135:109487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109487

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jensen CT, Gupta S, Saleh MM, et al. Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases. Radiology. 2022;303(1):90–98. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211838

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park S, Yoon JH, Joo I, et al. Image quality in liver CT: low-dose deep learning vs standard-dose model-based iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(5):2865–2874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08380-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vardhanabhuti V, Loader RJ, Mitchell GR, Riordan RD, Roobottom CA. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):545–552. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9424

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang B, Li N, Shi X, et al. Deep Learning Reconstruction Shows Better Lung Nodule Detection for Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT. Radiology. 2022;303(1):202–212. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210551

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang G, Zhang X, Xu L, et al. Value of deep learning reconstruction at ultra-low-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(9):5954–5963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08739-x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Zhou J, et al. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(1):82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F, et al. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(7):3951–3959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Afat S, Brockmann C, Nikoubashman O, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Simulated Low-Dose Perfusion CT to Detect Cerebral Perfusion Impairment after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis. Radiology. 2018;287(2):643–650. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162707

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sollmann N, Mei K, Hedderich DM, et al. Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(7):3606–3616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kolb M, Storz C, Kim JH, et al. Effect of a novel denoising technique on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in low-dose CT in patients with suspected appendicitis. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jensen CT, Liu X, Tamm EP, et al. Image Quality Assessment of Abdominal CT by Use of New Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: Initial Experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(1):50–57. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22332

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cao L, Liu X, Li J, et al. A study of using a deep learning image reconstruction to improve the image quality of extremely low-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for patients with hepatic lesions. Br J Radiol. 2021;94(1118):20201086. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201086

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zabić S, Wang Q, Morton T, Brown KM. A low dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031102. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4789628

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li W, You Y, Zhong S, et al. Image quality assessment of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for low dose aortic CTA: A feasibility study of 70 kVp and reduced contrast medium volume. Eur J Radiol. 2022;149:110221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110221

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang L, Liu H, Han J, et al. Ultra-low-dose CT lung screening with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction: evaluation via automatic nodule-detection software. Clin Radiol. 2023;S0009-9260(23)00031-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2023.01.006

Article  Google Scholar 

Hu Y, Zheng Z, Yu H, Wang J, Yang X, Shi H. Ultra-low-dose CT reconstructed with the artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction algorithm (AIIR) in 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT examination: a preliminary study. EJNMMI Phys. 2023;10(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00521-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lyu P, Liu N, Harrawood B, et al. Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(3):1629–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09206-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deák Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, et al. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology. 2013;266(1):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112707

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jensen CT, Telesmanich ME, Wagner-Bartak NA, et al. Evaluation of Abdominal Computed Tomography Image Quality Using a New Version of Vendor-Specific Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000472

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nagayama Y, Nakaura T, Oda S, et al. Value of 100 kVp scan with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm on a single-source CT system during whole-body CT for radiation and contrast medium dose reduction: an intra-individual feasibility study. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(2):217.e7–217.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.09.006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hou P, Feng X, Liu J, et al. Low Tube Voltage and Iterative Model Reconstruction in Follow-up CT Angiography After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Ultra-low Radiation Exposure and Contrast Medium Dose. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(4):494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Liu Z, Li M, et al. Reducing both radiation and contrast doses in coronary CT angiography in lean patients on a 16-cm wide-detector CT using 70 kVp and ASiR-V algorithm, in comparison with the conventional 100-kVp protocol. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(6):3036–3043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5837-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar