Marker P, Nielsen A, Bastian HL (2000) Fractures of the mandibular condyle. Part 1: patterns of distribution of types and causes of fractures in 348 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(5):417–421

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang WG, Chen CT, Tsay PK, Chen YR (2002) Functional results of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures after open and closed treatment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 52(3):498–503

Article  Google Scholar 

Santler G, Kärcher H, Ruda C, Köle E (1999) Fractures of the condylar process: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57(4):392–397

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki T, Kawamura H, Kasahara T, Nagasaka H (2004) Resorbable poly-l-lactide plates and screws for the treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: a clinical and radiologic follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62(8):919–924

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manisali M, Amin M, Aghabeigi B, Newman L (2003) Retromandibular approach to the mandibular condyle: a clinical and cadaveric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32(3):253–256

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sawhney R, Brown R, Ducic Y (2013) Condylar fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 46(5):779–790

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhagol A, Singh V, Kumar I, Verma A (2011) Prospective evaluation of a new classification system for the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(4):1159–1165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh V, Bhagol A, Goel M, Kumar I, Verma A (2010) Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(6):1304–1309

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luchini C, Stubbs B, Solmi M, Veronese N (2017) Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa scale. World J Meta-Anal 5(4):80–84

Article  Google Scholar 

Corbett MS, Higgins JP, Woolacott NF (2014) Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the cochrane risk of bias tool. Res Synth Methods 5(1):79–85

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 1(45):139–145

Article  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sterne JA, Becker BJ, Egger M (2005) The funnel plot. Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. 75–98

Kim SY, Ryu JY, Cho JY, Kim HM (2014) Outcomes of open versus closed treatment in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(6):297–300. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.6.297

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stypulkowski RP, Santos AG, Paula Silva E, Costa Moraes CA, Rosa EL (2019) Unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures: a retrospective clinical comparison of open versus closed treatment. Oral Maxillofac Surg 1(23):209–214

Article  Google Scholar 

Bansal A, Yadav P, Bhutia O, Roychoudhury A, Bhalla AS (2021) Comparison of outcome of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment in pediatric mandible fractures-a retrospective study. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 49(3):196–205

Article  Google Scholar 

Throckmorton GS, Ellis IE (2000) Recovery of mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29(6):421–427

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Landes CA, Lipphardt R (2005) Prospective evaluation of a pragmatic treatment rationale: open reduction and internal fixation of displaced and dislocated condyle and condylar head fractures and closed reduction of non-displaced, non-dislocated fractures: part I: condyle and subcondylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(8):859–870

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jensen T, Jensen J, Nørholt SE, Dahl M, Lenk-Hansen L, Svensson P (2006) Open reduction and rigid internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures by an intraoral approach: a long-term follow-up study of 15 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(12):1771–1779

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kokemueller H, Konstantinovic VS, Barth EL, Goldhahn S, von See C, Tavassol F, Essig H, Gellrich NC (2012) Endoscope-assisted transoral reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures—a prospective double-center study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(2):384–395

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kotrashetti SM, Lingaraj JB, Khurana V (2013) A comparative study of closed versus open reduction and internal fixation (using retromandibular approach) in the management of subcondylar fracture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115(4):e7-11

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gareikpatii N (2021) Study of open versus closed reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. Int Surg J 8(11):3402–3406

Article  Google Scholar 

Prakash R Sr, K R, Alwala AM, Porika R, Manjusha, Katkuri S (2022) Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation of condylar fractures of the mandible: a prospective study. Cureus 14(1):e21186. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21186

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karan A, Kedarnath NS, Reddy GS, Kumar TH, Neelima C, Bhavani M, Nayyar AS (2019) Condylar fractures: surgical versus conservative management. Ann Maxillofac Surg 9(1):15

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khiabani KS, Raisian S, Khanian MM (2015) Comparison between two techniques for the treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: closed treatment technique and transoral endoscopic-assisted open reduction. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 14(2):363–369

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rashid A, Mumtaz M, Asif J, Azeem M (2014) Mandibular Condyle Fracture-Effect of Treatment on Occlusal Relationship. Pak Oral Dent J 34(1)

Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL, Kuhlisch E, Loukota RA, Rasse M, Schubert J, Terheyden H, Eckelt U (2008) Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation of fractures of the mandibular condylar process: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study with special evaluation of fracture level. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(12):2537–2544

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh V, Kumar N, Bhagol A, Jajodia N (2018) A comparative evaluation of closed and open treatment in the management of unilateral displaced mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 11(3):205–210

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vesnaver A, Ahčan U, Rozman J (2012) Evaluation of surgical treatment in mandibular condyle fractures. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 40(8):647–653

Article  Google Scholar 

Khelemsky R, Moubayed SP, Buchbinder D (2016) What is the evidence for open versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar fractures in adults? Laryngoscope 126(11):2423–2425

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kozakiewicz M (2019) Classification proposal for fractures of the processus condylaris mandibulae. Clin Oral Invest 23(1):485–491

Article  Google Scholar 

Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL, Kuhlisch E, Loukota R, Rasse M, Schubert J, Terheyden H (2006) Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process–a prospective randomized multi-centre study. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 34(5):306–314

Article  Google Scholar 

Haug RH, Brandt MT (2007) Closed reduction, open reduction, and endoscopic assistance: current thoughts on the management of mandibular condyle fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7):90–102

Article  Google Scholar 

Assael LA (2003) Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: an alternative interpretation of the evidence. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61(11):1333–1339

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis E III (2015) Surgical treatment of adult mandibular condylar fractures provides better outcomes than closed treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(3):482–493

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar