This study presented a modified forceps technique that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously reported. Unlike the forceps techniques developed earlier, which often involve using forceps for dissection and retraction of the filter, this innovative method simultaneously applies both pulling (via a wire loop) and pushing (via forceps) forces to the upper part of the filter. This generates a force line that not only straightens the filter but also aligns it with the sheath. This is because all three forces - the two from the technique and the push force from the sheath - are aligned on the same line. The results demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of this technique, establishing it as a feasible innovative approach for handling complicated IVC filter retrievals involving realignment and dissection.

There are several factors associated with the failure of standard retrieval techniques. These include the presence of an embedded and tilted filter tip, a prolonged dwell time, and thrombosis within the filter [10, 11]. To enhance the success rate of IVC filter retrieval, advanced techniques have been developed. These advanced techniques are defined as methods that go beyond the simple use of a snare and sheath. Al-Hakim et al. conducted a comparative analysis of advanced filter retrieval techniques and standard techniques [12]. The results revealed that advanced techniques had a significantly higher success rate of filter retrievals (94.7%) compared to standard techniques (73.2%). Desai et al. conducted a retrospective study on 762 retrieval procedures. Their findings indicated that when standard retrieval techniques were unsuccessful, advanced techniques were deemed necessary and employed 18% of the time [10].

One of the most common challenges in filter retrieval is dealing with an IVC filter that has become embedded in the apex with fibrosis present [11]. While there are some advanced techniques to address this issue, the forceps technique was proved the most efficient technique [8, 9, 13]. In a study conducted by Zhong et al., endobronchial forceps were initially employed to extract embedded IVC filters from a total of 535 patients. The researchers reported a success rate of 98.7% in their retrieval attempts, demonstrating that this approach can effectively circumvent the need for unnecessary snare removal attempts, thereby reducing fluoroscopy usage, procedure duration, and associated costs [8]. Tavri et al. conducted a study where endobronchial forceps were used to retrieve IVC filters from 60 patients when standard retrieval techniques were unsuccessful. They achieved success in 58 cases (96.7%) but also encountered complications in 4 cases [9]. The study suggested that factors such as filter tilt, caval penetration, and filter fracture could indicate the necessity of using forceps as the primary retrieval technique.

The forceps technique, which has been described in prior literature, can be performed using either rigid endobronchial forceps or flexible endoscopy forceps [13, 14]. Typically, these forceps are employed for the dissection of neointimal and fibrotic tissue surrounding the filter tip, as well as for the subsequent retrieval of the filter. The forceps are positioned close to the filter tip under spot magnification fluoroscopy. They are then used to gently dissect the IVC filter tip from the IVC wall by removing the tissue around the filter tip. After confirming contact between the forceps and the metal hook or tip of the IVC filter, the forceps are used to grasp the tip. Subsequently, a large sheath was employed to encase the filter tip. This sheath was then utilized to dissect and remove the legs from the wall of the IVC.

The primary complication associated with the forceps technique is the formation of an IVC pseudoaneurysm [15]. This can occur if the operator unintentionally grasps the caval wall. However, the incidence of this complication is relatively low [12]. Another limitation of the forceps technique is that its success is highly dependent on the type of forceps used. Some authors [9], have emphasized the importance of selecting the appropriate forceps for use, taking into account parameters such as length, neck angle, and jaw type. To date, no studies have definitively demonstrated which type of forceps is most effective for filter retrieval. Furthermore, the selection is often limited by the hospital’s routine inventory. In certain situations, such as in our first case, the neointimal and fibrotic tissue around the filter tip can become excessively large due to prolonged dwell time and severe filter tilt. In these instances, the jaws of the forceps may be too small to grasp and remove the tissue.

A few studies [9, 16, 17] have described the application of both forceps and wire-loop snare techniques. In cases where the wire-loop snare technique was unsuccessful as the initial attempt, the forceps technique was applied as a backup. However, our modified forceps technique is distinctly different from these methods. The wire loop was initially employed to aid the forceps in grasping the upper portion of the filter (Fig. 3A). The forceps, facilitated by the wire loop, were used to easily grasp the upper part or shoulder of the filter (Fig. 3B). The assistant partially retracted the vascular sheath, while the operator applied a pulling force through the wire loop and a pushing force through the forceps. This process created a line of force that straightened the filter, thereby generating a ‘sling’ effect to extract the tip from the fibrosis (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, it facilitated the alignment of the tip with the sheath. By advancing the vascular sheath, the assistant achieved alignment of the filter tip with the sheath, capitalizing on the alignment of all three forces along the same line. The sheath then dissected the fibrotic tissue, ultimately facilitating the insertion of the filter tip into the sheath(Fig. 3D). Once the position of the filter tip inside the sheath was confirmed, the forceps were opened and withdrawn from the sheath. By solely pulling the wire loop and pushing the sheath forward, a counterforce is created to accommodate the excess neointimal hyperplasia and fibrosis around the tip or strut, thereby completing the retrieval process.

The illustration of the modified forceps technique. (A) The wire loop was initially performed under the tip of the filter. (B) The forceps, along with the wire loop, were utilized to grasp the upper portion or shoulder of the filter. (C) The operator exerted a pulling force on the wire loop (black arrow) and a pushing force on the forceps (white arrow). This action generated a line of force that straightened the filter (double arrow). (D) Complete the filter retrieval by pulling the wire loop and advancing the sheath forward

This modified forceps technique offers several advantages. Firstly, it eliminates the need for the forceps to grasp and dissect the fibrotic tissue around the filter tip, thereby eliminating the risk of perforating the IVC wall. Secondly, this technique has a low threshold and is actually quite simple to use when grasping the upper part or the shoulders of the filter. Compared to grasping the tip of the filter, this method is significantly easier and less dependent on the instrument.

The potential risk of this technique is the fracture of the IVC filter when forceps are used to grasp the shoulder of the filter and apply a pushing force, similar to what may occur with the conventional forceps technique [13]. Posham et al. applied the filter eversion technique by clamping over the neck of the filter in 25 cases [18], whereas Matsumoto et al. utilized the grasp-and-fold technique by gripping at the midportion of the filter in 14 cases [19] when attempts to dissect the filter tip from the IVC wall using forceps were unsuccessful. They employed a large sheath to exert a counterforce to the forceps retraction in order to either evert or fold the filter inside the sheath. Despite not encountering complications such as IVC filter fracture in their reporting, the potential for IVC filter issues remains present, even though the force applied to the filter by forceps in our technique is considerably lower compared to other techniques.