Available online 14 March 2024

To assess whether smaller increment and regionalised subjective grading improves the repeatability of corneal fluorescein staining, and to determine the neurological approach adopted for subjective grading by practitioners.

Experienced eye-care practitioners (n = 28, aged 45 ± 12 years), graded 20 full corneal staining images of patients with mild to severe Sjögren's syndrome with the Oxford grading scheme (both in 0.5 and 1.0 increments, globally and in 5 regions), expanded National Eye Institute (NEI) and SICCA Ocular Staining Score (OSS) grading scales in randomised order. This was repeated after 7–10 days. The digital images were also analysed using ImageJ for comparison.

The Oxford grading scheme was similar with whole and half unit grading (2.77vs2.81,p = 0.145), but the variability was reduced (0.14vs0.12,p < 0.001). Regional grade was lower (p < 0.001) and more variable (p < 0.001) than global image grading (1.86 ± 0.44 for whole increment grading and 1.90 ± 0.39 for half unit increments). The correlation with global grading was high for both whole (r = 0.928,p < 0.001) and half increment (r = 0.934,p < 0.001) grading. Average grading across participants was associated with particle number and vertical position, with 74.4–80.4% of the linear variance accounted for by the digital image analysis.

Using half unit increments with the Oxford grading scheme improve its sensitivity and repeatability in recording corneal staining. Regional grading doesn't give a comparable score and increased variability. The key neurally extracted features in assigning a subjective staining grade by clinicians were the number of discrete staining locations (particles) and how close to the vertical centre was their spread, across all three scales.

Corneal staining

Subjective grading

Objective grading

Sjögren's syndrome

Dry eye disease

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.