Cronjé HS. Pelvic organ prolapse. In: Kruger TF, Botha MH, editors. Clinical gynaecology. 4th ed. Cape Town: Juta; 2011. p. 487–515.

Google Scholar 

Laganà AS, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, Vitale SG. Pelvic organ prolapse: the impact on quality of life and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2018;39(2):164–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1294155.

Article  Google Scholar 

Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005;112(7):971–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1225.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghanbari Z, Ghaemi M, Shafiee A, et al. Quality of life following pelvic organ prolapse treatments in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):7166. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237166.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barber MD, Maher CF. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cichowski S, Grzybowska ME, Halder GE, et al. International urogynecology consultation: patient reported outcome measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2603–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05315-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Øvretveit J, Zubkoff L, Nelson EC, Frampton S, Lehmann Knudsen J, Zimlichman E. Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(6): 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx108.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S. P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:176–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Belayneh T, Gebeyehu A, Adefris M, Rortveit G. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural adaptations and translations of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03920-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. Value Health. 2009;12:1075–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:103–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. User’s manual for medical outcomes study (MOS) core measures of health-related quality of life. RAND Corporation; MR-162-RC. 1995. Available from: www.rand.org.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00044-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt P. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:349–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023499322593.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chan SSC, Cheung RYK, Yiu KW, Lee LL, Pang AWL, Chung TKH. Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women’s treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1027–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1698-y.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aponte MM, Rosenblum N. Repair of pelvic organ prolapse: what is the goal? Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-013-0385-y.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, et al. Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;106(2):184–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00229-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, et al. Validation of a German version of the P-QoL Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(6):641–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0809-x.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Claerhout F, Moons P, Ghesquiere S, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):569–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1081-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Oliveira MS, Tamanini JTN, de Aguiar CG. Validation of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) in Portuguese version in Brazilian women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:1191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0934-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sánchez-Sánchez B, Yuste-Sánchez MJ, Arranz-Martín B, Navarro-Brazález B, Romay-Barrero H, Torres-Lacomba M. Quality of life in POP: validity, reliability and responsiveness of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QoL) in Spanish women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051690.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rzepka J, Zalewski K, Stefanowicz A, Khullar V, Swift S, Digesu GA. Validation of the Polish version of P-QoL questionnaire. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(7):477–83. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2016.0029.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belayneh T, Gebeyehu A, Adefris M, Rortveit G, Genet T. Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) in Amharic. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1079-z.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fukumoto Y, Uesaka Y, Yamamoto K, et al. Assessment of quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse: conditional translation and trial of P-QOL for use in Japan. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;99(3):531–42. https://doi.org/10.5980/jpnjurol1989.99.531.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nojomi M, Digesu GA, Khullar V, et al. Validation of Persian version of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL). Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:229–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1529-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scarlato A, Souza CCC, Fonseca ESM, Sartori MGF, de Castello Girão Manoel João Batista Castro RA. Validation, reliability, and responsiveness of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:751–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1354-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Arruda GT, de Andrade DF, Virtuoso JF. Internal structure and classification of pelvic floor dysfunction distress by PFDI-20 total score. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022;6(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00459-6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar