Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69(2):171–7. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.16.04011-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1438–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.057.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(15):1554–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.2827.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bunyavejchevin S, Songsiriphan A, Ruanphoo P, Chiengthong K. Surgical outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for vaginal vault prolapse prevention: 10 years review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49(7):1867–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15670.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lo TS, Al-kharabsheh AM, Tan YL, Pue LB, Hsieh WC, Uy-Patrimonio MC. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic organ prolapse at 36 months follow-up. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2017.10.016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lozo S, Chill HH, Botros C, Goldberg RP, Gafni-Kane A. Long term surgical outcomes of vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system vs. vaginal vault uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;280:150–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.11.025.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bowen ST, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD, et al. Vaginal morphology and position associated with prolapse recurrence after vaginal surgery: a secondary analysis of the DEMAND study. BJOG. 2024;131(3):267–77.https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17620.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Calistar S Instructions for Use 2020. https://promedon-upf.com/wp-content/uploads/CalistarS-STB-brochure-english-final.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2023.

Naumann G, Hüsch T, Mörgeli C, Kolterer A, Tunn R. Mesh-augmented transvaginal repair of recurrent or complex anterior pelvic organ prolapse in accordance with the SCENIHR opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):819–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04525-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zullo MA, Schiavi MC, Luffarelli P, et al. Efficacy and safety of anterior vaginal prolapse treatment using single incision repair system: multicentric study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(4):646–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.10.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lo TS, Tan YL. Use of vaginal mesh; an Asian perspective footnote from the pan-Asia meeting. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):675–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04219-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chan SS, Choy KW, Lee BP, et al. Chinese validation of Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):807–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1102-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Su TH, Lau HH. Validation of a Chinese version of the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire. J Sex Med. 2010;7(12):3940–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01891.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1998.

Google Scholar 

Lo TS, Tan YL, Cortes EF, Wu PY, Pue LB, Al-Kharabsheh A. Clinical outcomes of mesh exposure/extrusion: presentation, timing and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(3):284–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12340.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nguyen JN, Jakus-Waldman SM, Walter AJ, White T, Menefee SA. Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(3):539–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182479283.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lo TS, Lin YH, Chua S, Chu HC, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Ng KL. Immunochemical analysis on polypropylene mesh: does mesh size make a difference? Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(1):47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04399-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gold KP, Ward RM, Zimmerman CW, et al. Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(10):1461–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1706-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):629–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ada95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frankman EA, Alperin M, Sutkin G, Meyn L, Zyczynski HM. Mesh exposure and associated risk factors in women undergoing transvaginal prolapse repair with mesh. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:926313. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/926313.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Holdø B, Møllersen K, Verelst M, Milsom I, Svenningsen R, Skjeldestad FE. Surgeon’s experience and clinical outcome after retropubic tension-free vaginal tape—A case series. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(8):1071–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13830.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lo TS, Nawawi EA, Wu PY, bt Karim N, Al-Kharabsheh A. Predictors for persistent urodynamic stress incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery with and without midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(3):399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2837-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Borstad E, Abdelnoor M, Staff AC, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):179–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1007-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van der Ploeg JM, van der Steen A, Oude Rengerink K, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JP. Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BJOG. 2014;121(5):537–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12509.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lo TS, Bt Karim N, Nawawi EA, Wu PY, Nusee Z. Predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(9):1313–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2685-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krutova VA, Tarabanova OV, Khachetsukova AA, Khalaphyan AA. Postoperative pelvic dysfunctions associated with the reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Minerva Ginecol. 2020;72(4):202–11. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04532-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar