Examining Inclusive Language in Clinical Narratives in Medical Biochemistry Textbooks to Model Equitable Patient-Centered Care in Preclinical Undergraduate Medical Education

Cox C, Fritz Z. Presenting complaint: Use of language that disempowers patients. BMJ. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-066720.

Crocker AF, Smith SN. Person-first language: are we practicing what we preach? J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S140067.

Fernández L, et al. Words matter: what do patients find judgmental or offensive in outpatient notes? J Gen Intern Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7.

Healy M, Richard A, Kidia K. How to reduce stigma and bias in clinical communication: a narrative review. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07609-y.

P Goddu A, et al. Do words matter? Stigmatizing language and the transmission of bias in the medical record. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(5).

Park J, et al. Physician use of stigmatizing language in patient medical records. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052.

Raney J, et al. Words matter: An antibias workshop for health care professionals to reduce stigmatizing language. MedEdPORTAL J Teach Learn Resour. 2021. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11115.

Kost A, et al. Use of patient identifiers at the University of Washington School of Medicine: building institutional consensus to reduce bias and stigma. Fam Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2021.251330.

Beach MC, et al. Testimonial injustice: Linguistic bias in the medical records of Black patients and women. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06682-z.

Black C, Pondugula N, Spearman-McCarthy EV. Words matter: stylistic writing strategies for racial health equity in academic medicine. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9(6):2071–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Basky G. How doctors describe patients matters - even in their notes. CMAJ. 2022;194(9):E347-8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zlatev J, Blomberg J. Language may indeed influence thought. Front Psych. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01631.

Loftus EF, Miller DG, Burns HJ. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem. 1978;4(1):19–31.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Doobay-Persaud A, et al. Power and language in medical education. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(4s):120–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Advancing health equity: Guide on language, narrative and concepts. 2021. Available from: Available at ama-assn.org/equity-guide. Accessed 18 Jan 2022.

CDC. Health equity guiding principles for inclusive communication. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/Health_Equity.html#print. Accessed 18 Jan 2022.

Donnelly WJ. The language of medical case histories. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(11):1045–8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wynter L, et al. Medical students: what educational resources are they using? BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tez M, Yildiz B. How reliable are medical textbooks? J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(4):550.

Article  Google Scholar 

Morgan H. Conducting a qualitative document analysis. Qual Rep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044.

Lieberman M, Peet A, Chansky M.  Marks’ Basic medical biochemistry: A clinical approach. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.

Ferrier DR. Lippincott illustrated reviews: Biochemistry. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.

Google Scholar 

Murphy Mj, Srivastava R, Deans K.  Clinical biochemistry: An illustrated colour text. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2018.

Google Scholar 

Dhakal K. NVivo. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(2):270–2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sam CP, et al. A qualitative study on the experiences of preclinical students in learning clinical and communication skills at a simulation centre. Med Sci Educ. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01851-7.

Banasiak K, et al. Language matters–a diabetes Canada consensus statement. Can J Diabetes. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.05.008.

Dickinson JK, et al. The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Care. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci17-0041.

Kelly JF, Dow SJ, Westerhoff C. Does our choice of substance-related terms influence perceptions of treatment need? An empirical investigation with two commonly used terms. J Drug Issues. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204261004000403.

Volger S, et al. Patients’ preferred terms for describing their excess weight: Discussing obesity in clinical practice. Obesity. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.217.

Wadden TA, Didie E. What’s in a name? Patients’ preferred terms for describing obesity. Obes Res. 2003;11(9).

Dickinson JK. The experience of diabetes-related language in diabetes care. Diabetes Spectr. 2018;31(1):58–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lewis DM. Language matters in diabetes and in diabetes science and research. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221085028.

Speight J, et al. Diabetes Australia position statement. A new language for diabetes: improving communications with and about people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97(3):425–31.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dunning T, Speight J, Bennett C. Language, the “diabetes restricted code/dialect”, and what it means for people with diabetes and clinicians. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(1):18–26.

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang GC, et al. Antibias and inclusive language in scholarly writing: a primer for authors. Acad Med. 2022;97(12):1870.

Article  Google Scholar 

Himmelstein G, Bates D, Zhou L. Examination of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967.

Rushmer R, Davies HTO. Unlearning in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.009506.

Ambrose SA, How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching., et al. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Hoboken. UNITED STATES: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2010.

Google Scholar 

Lewis BE, Naik AR. A scoping review to identify and organize literature trends of bias research within medical student and resident education. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):919.

Article  Google Scholar 

McGowan LJ, Powell R, French DP. Older adults’ construal of sedentary behaviour: Implications for reducing sedentary behaviour in older adult populations. J Health Psychol. 2021;26(12):2186–99.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tomko JK, Munley PH. Predicting counseling psychologists attitudes and clinical judgments with respect to older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(2):233–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ben-Harush A, et al. Ageism among physicians, nurses, and social workers: Findings from a qualitative study. Eur J Ageing. 2017;14(1):39–48.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ashford RD, et al. Recovery dialects: A pilot study of stigmatizing and nonstigmatizing label use by individuals in recovery from substance use disorders. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019;27:530–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Freedman-Cass DA, et al. The value and process of inclusion: using sensitive, respectful, and inclusive language and images in NCCN content. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(5):434–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Frey T, Young RK. Correct and Preferred Usage, in AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jama/9780190246556.003.0011.

Springer M. Current guidance on inclusive language for medical and science journals. Science Editor. 2022;45(4):136–8.

Google Scholar 

Terrault NA, et al. Ending stigmatizing language in alcohol and liver disease: A liver societies’ statement. Hep Intl. 2023;17(6):1331–2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Valentine V. The most important thing we give to people is hope: overcoming stigma in diabetes and obesity. Diabetes Spectr. 2020;33(1):89–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Inclusive use of language. Archives of Endocrinology Editorial Board. Available from: https://www.aem-sbem.com/inclusive-use-of-language/. Accessed 1 Feb 2024.

Hales KG. Signaling inclusivity in undergraduate biology courses through deliberate framing of genetics topics relevant to gender identity, disability, and race. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019;19(2):es2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hadland SE, Park TW, Bagley SM. Stigma associated with medication treatment for young adults with opioid use disorder: A case series. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018;13(1):15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Volkow ND, Gordon JA, Koob GF. Choosing appropriate language to reduce the stigma around mental illness and substance use disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46(13):2230–2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moore MD, et al. Stigma, opioids, and public health messaging: The need to disentangle behavior from identity. Am J Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305628.

Yang LH, et al. Stigma and substance use disorders: an international phenomenon. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017;30(5):378–88.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rahman, L. Disability language guide. 2019. Available from: https://disability.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj26391/files/media/file/disability-language-guide-stanford_1.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2024.

Meadows A, Daníelsdóttir S. What’s in a word? On weight stigma and terminology. Front Psychol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01527.

Bonham B, Bonham VL. Should electronic health record-derived social and behavioral data be used in precision medicine research? AMA J Ethics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.873.

Moore S, Cattapan A. Women’s reproductive health and “failure speak.” CMAJ. 2020;192(12):E325-e326.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hefler M, et al. New policy of people-first language to replace ‘smoker’, ‘vaper’ ‘tobacco user’ and other behaviour-based labels. Tob Control. 2023;32(2):133–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gudzune KA, et al. Patients who feel judged about their weight have lower trust in their primary care providers. Patient Educ Couns. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.019.

Phelan SM, et al. The role of weight bias and role-modeling in medical students’ patient-centered communication with higher weight standardized patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(8):1962–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif