Sleep Hygiene Index: Dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity among Colombian medical students

Abstract

Background and purpose: A new version of the Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI-10) has recently been introduced, and the psychometric performance in other populations is unknown. This study aimed to determine the dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity of the SHI-10 among medical students at a Colombian university. Methods: A psychometric study was designed to determine indicators of validity (construct and nomological) and reliability (internal consistency) in which 309 medical students between 18 and 39 years (M=20.83, SD=2.68) and 54.69% were female. Construct validity (dimensionality) was tested through confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients, and nomological validity through correlations with the Athens Insomnia Scale, Epworth Somnolence Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Results: The four-dimensional structure of the SHI-10 showed adequate indicators of goodness of fit (Satorra-Bentler's chi-square of 43.30 [df of 29, p=.04], chi-square/df of 1.49, RMSEA of .04 [90%CI .01-.06], CFI of .97, TLI of .96 and SRMR .04). The four dimensions of the SHI-10 showed values less than .70 and limited nomological validity (most Pearson correlations were less than .30). Conclusions: The SHI-10 shows a four-dimensional structure of SHI-10; however, the four dimensions of the SHI-10 present low internal consistency and limited nomological validity. More studies are needed to show the psychometric performance of the SHI-10.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The Vice-Rector for Research of the Universidad del Magdalena financed the project through resolution 0429 of 2022.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This project was approved by an institutional ethics committee of the Universidad del Magdalena at Santa Marta, Colombia, according to minutes 005 of the ordinary virtual session of June 9, 2022.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The corresponding author can request data supporting this research with reasonable justification.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif