• Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, et al. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiovascular care: endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; affirmation of value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(19):e7–e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.036. This study does an in depth review of the hemodynamic effects of various MCS devices and details their impact in patients in CS or undergoing HRPCI.

Atti V, Narayanan MA, Patel B, et al. A comprehensive review of mechanical circulatory support devices. Heart Int. 2022;16(1):37–48. Published 2022 Mar 4. https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2022.16.1.37.

•• Garg P, Hussain MWA, Sareyyupoglu B. Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01484-w. This study reviewed the functioning and hemodynamic effects of multiple Mechanical Circulatory Support devices.

Daly M, Long B, Koyfman A, Lentz S. Identifying cardiogenic shock in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(11):2425–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.045.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mebazaa A, Combes A, van Diepen S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):760–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5214-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, Thiele H, Washam JB, Cohen MG; on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:e232–e268. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525.

Fincke R, Hochman JS, Lowe AM, et al. Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(2):340–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.060.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krishna M, Zacharowski K. Principles of intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9(1):24–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn051.

Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1287–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1208410.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glazier JJ, Kaki A. The Impella device: historical background, clinical applications and future directions. Int J Angiol. 2019;28(2):118–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676369.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lüsebrink E, Kellnar A, Krieg K, et al. Percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump support in cardiology. Circulation. 2022;145(16):1254–84. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panuccio G, Neri G, Macrì LM, Salerno N, De Rosa S, Torella D. Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022;40:101007. Published 2022 Mar 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101007.

Patient Information for the Impella® 2.5. Abiomed. Impella 2.5® patient brochure. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf14/P140003d.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2023.

Srihari N. Novel percutaneous cardiac assist devices. Circulation. 2011;123:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.945055.

Atkinson TM, Ohman EM, O’Neill WW, Rab T, Cigarroa JE; Interventional Scientific Council of the American College of Cardiology. A practical approach to mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an interventional perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(9):871–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.046.

Le Gall A, Follin A, Cholley B, Mantz J, Aissaoui N, Pirracchio R. Veno-arterial-ECMO in the intensive care unit: from technical aspects to clinical practice. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37(3):259–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.08.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Su Y, Liu K, Zheng JL, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(12):792. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.186.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Makdisi G, Wang IW. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) review of a lifesaving technology. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(7):E166–76. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.07.17.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zein R, Patel C, Mercado-Alamo A, Schreiber T, Kaki A. A review of the Impella devices. Interv Cardiol. 2022;17:e05. Published 2022 Apr 8. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.11.

Abiomed Impella RP Information for Use. 2020. Accessible from https://www.fda.gov/media/138463/download.

Anderson M, Morris DL, Tang D, et al. Outcomes of patients with right ventricular failure requiring short-term hemodynamic support with the Impella RP device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(12):1448–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.08.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meineri M, Van Rensburg AE, Vegas A. Right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation: prevention and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012;26(2):217–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2012.03.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anderson MB, Goldstein J, Milano C, et al. Benefits of a novel percutaneous ventricular assist device for right heart failure: the prospective RECOVER RIGHT study of the Impella RP device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1549–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2015.08.018.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Banfi C, Pozzi M, Siegenthaler N, et al. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: cannulation techniques. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(12):3762–73. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.12.88.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Samsky MD, Morrow DA, Proudfoot AG, Hochman JS, Thiele H, Rao SV. Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a review. JAMA. 2021;326(18):1840–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.18323. Erratum. In: JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2333. PMID: 34751704; PMCID: PMC9661446.

Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, et al. Use of mechanical circulatory support devices among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2037748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.

•• Shah M, Patnaik S, Patel B, et al. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2. This study reviewed the trends in hospital mortality and MCS use in acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock and in non-acute MI associated cardiogenic shock.

Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Goldstein DJ, et al. American Association for Thoracic Surgery/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines on selected topics in mechanical circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(3):865–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.021.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basir MB, Schreiber TL, Grines CL, et al. Effect of early initiation of mechanical circulatory support on survival in cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(6):845–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.037.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Batchelor RJ, Wheelahan A, Zheng WC, Stub D, Yang Y, Chan W. Impella versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(14):3955. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11143955.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karami M, den Uil CA, Ouweneel DM, Scholte NT, Engström AE, Akin S, Lagrand WK, Vlaar AP, Jewbali LS, Henriques JP. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020;9(2):164–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872619865891.

Kuno T, Takagi H, Ando T, et al. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97(5):E636–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29236.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lemor A, Basir MB, Truesdell AG, et al. Trends in the outcomes of high-risk percutaneous ventricular assist device-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention, 2008–2018. Am J Cardiol. 2021;156:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.048.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ronco D, Matteucci M, Ravaux JM, Marra S, Torchio F, Corazzari C, Massimi G, Beghi C, Maessen J, Lorusso R. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to definitive treatment in post-infarction ventricular septal rupture. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(10):1053–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.046. PMID: 34016403.

Żbikowska K, Wróbel K. Mechanical circulatory support in delayed surgery of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture in patients in cardiogenic shock-a review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(16):4728. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164728. PMID: 36012967; PMCID: PMC9409930.

Coyan G, Anand N, Imran M, Gomez H, Ramanan R, Murray H, Sanon S, Yoon P, Kaczorowski D, Bonatti J. ECMO and Impella support strategies as a bridge to surgical repair of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture. Medicina. 2022;58(5):611. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050611.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

David CH, Quessard A, Mastroianni C, et al. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 and the Impella left direct pumps for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(1):183–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz179.

Vallabhajosyula S, Arora S, Sakhuja A, et al. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support for postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(3):489–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.029.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lorusso R, Raffa GM, Alenizy K, et al. Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: part 1-Adult patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38(11):1125–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.014.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zaaqoq AM, Pottash M, Ahlstrom E, Brodie D. Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: narrative review navigating the ethical issues. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(8 Pt A):2628–2635. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.10.010.

Khorsandi M, Dougherty S, Bouamra O, et al. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12(1):55. Published 2017 Jul 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0618-0.

Rastan AJ, Dege A, Mohr M, Doll N, Falk V, Walther T, et al. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:302–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griffith BP, Anderson MB, Samuels LE, Pae WE Jr, Naka Y, Frazier OH. The RECOVER I: a multicenter prospective study of Impella 5.0/LD for postcardiotomy circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(2):548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.067.

Topkara VK, Sayer GT, Clerkin KJ, et al. Recovery with temporary mechanical circulatory support while waitlisted for heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):900–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.022.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moonsamy P, Axtell AL, Ibrahim NE, et al. Survival after heart transplantation in patients bridged with mechanical circulatory support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(23):2892–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.037.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ouyang D, Gulati G, Ha R, Banerjee D. Incidence of temporary mechanical circulatory support before heart transplantation and impact on post-transplant outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(9):1060–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.04.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shou BL, Verma A, Florissi IS, Schena S, Benharash P, Choi CW. Temporary mechanical circulatory support for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Surg Res. 2022;280:363–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.034.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Almajed MR, Mahmood S, Obri M, et al. Application of Impella mechanical circulatory support devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement and balloon aortic valvuloplasty: a single center experience [published online ahead of print, 2023 Mar 21]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;S1553–8389(23)00110–0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2023.03.006.

Ghasemzadeh N, Kim N, Amlani S, et al. A review of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with COVID-19. Cardiol Clin. 2022;40(3):321–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2022.03.007.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar