記住我
J Pediatr Intensive Care
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776409
Orkun Baloglu
1 Department of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
2 Cleveland Clinic Children's Center for Artificial Intelligence (C4AI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Shawn D. Ryan
3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Ali M. Onder
4 Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, Delaware, United States
,
David Rosen
5 Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
,
Charles J. Mullett
6 Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
,
Daniel S. Munther
3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
› Author AffiliationsThe authors have brought to the publisher's attention some corrections that need to be made to our previously published article titled “A Clinical Mathematical Model Estimating Postoperative Urine Output in Children Underwent Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Congenital Heart Surgery,” which was published in the Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care with DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758474 on November 11, 2022.
The corrections are as follows:
3. The following sentence should be added to the figure caption and the methods section: “To find the urine output in mL/kg/h, the Q uvalue calculated using the above equation should be divided by the patient's weight (kg) and 32 hours.”
4. The results were recalculated with the corrected parameter k = 6.06. After correcting the parameter “k,” the recalculated results were more accurate compared with the original results. The updated results are as follows:
Mean absolute error: 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.965–1.033).
Root mean squared error: 1.415, 95% CI (1.318–1.512).
R 2: 0.801, 95% CI (0.791–0.812).
These updated results should be revised in the text after the revised formula in item 2 above.
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience these errors may have caused. The online version of the article is also corrected. Thank you for your understanding and assistance.
Publication HistoryArticle published online:
12 December 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
留言 (0)