Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back

Abstract

Objective: Identify characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the low back. Methods: Twenty-five subjects with myofascial trigger point(s) [MTrP(s)] on the low back participated in this cross-sectional study. The location, number and type (active or latent) of MTrPs were verified by ultrasound; additionally, data on pain pressure threshold, physical function, quality of life, disability, pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, emotional health, exercise motivation and pain were collected. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, one-way ANOVAs and factorial ANCOVA were used to achieve study objectives. Results: No statistically significant differences in variables were found between types of MTrPs: Group 1 (Active, n=13), 2 (Latent, n=5) 3 (Atypical, no twitching but with spontaneous pain, n=2) and 4 (Atypical, no twitching and no spontaneous pain, n=5) except the number of MTrPs, current pain, and worst pain (p=.01-.001). There were interaction effects between spontaneous pain and twitching response on reports of physical function, current pain level, and worst pain level (p=.04-.002). Participants in Group 3 reported lower levels of physical function, higher levels of current pain, and higher levels of worst pain compared to those in Group 4. Participants in Group 1 and 2 had similar levels of physical function, current pain and worst pain. Discussion: Number of MTrPs is most closely associated with the level of pain. Spontaneous pain report seems to be a decisive factor associated with poor physical function; however, twitching response is not.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Research Eureka Accelerator Program (REAP), the Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Auburn University and Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine IRB gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif