Early application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves pain control and functional scores in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Bijlsma JWJ, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FPJG (2011) Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet Lond Engl 377(9783):2115–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60243-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Monticone M, Frigau L, Sconza C, Foti C, Mola F, Respizzi S (2019) Italian version of the risk assessment and prediction tool: properties and usefulness of a decision-making tool for subjects’ discharge after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Int J Stat Med Res 4(8):8–16. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2019.08.02

Article  Google Scholar 

Bryan S, Goldsmith LJ, Davis JC, Hejazi S, MacDonald V, McAllister P, Randall E, Suryaprakash N, Wu AD, Sawatzky R (2018) Revisiting patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a longitudinal observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2340-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Monticone M, Sconza C, Portoghese I, Nishigami T, Wand BM, Sorrentino G et al (2021) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire in Italian subjects with painful knee osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01754-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

König A, Walther M, Kirschner S, Gohlke F (2000) Balance sheets of knee and functional scores 5 years after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a source for patient information. J Arthroplasty 15(3):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90532-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). HCUP facts and figures: statistics on hospital-based care in the United States, 2009 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91984/.  Accessed 2 June 2023

Mandeville D, Osternig LR, Chou L-S (2008) The effect of total knee replacement surgery on gait stability. Gait Posture 27(1):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.02.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wada M, Kawahara H, Shimada S, Miyazaki T, Baba H (2002) Joint proprioception before and after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 403:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200210000-00024

Article  Google Scholar 

Mistry JB, Elmallah RDK, Bhave A, Chughtai M, Cherian JJ, McGinn T et al (2016) Rehabilitative guidelines after total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 29(3):201–217. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1579670

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Domínguez-Navarro F, Igual-Camacho C, Silvestre-Muñoz A, Roig-Casasús S, Blasco JM (2018) Effects of balance and proprioceptive training on total hip and knee replacement rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture 62:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, Middleton RG, Reed M, Sahota O et al (2020) Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop 91(1):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sconza C, Coletta F, Magarelli N, D’Agostino MC, Egan CG, Di Matteo B, Respizzi S, Mazziotti G (2022) Multimodal conservative treatment of migrating bone marrow edema associated with early osteonecrosis of the hip. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 10:2050313X211067617. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X211067617

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moya D, Ramón S, Schaden W, Wang C-J, Guiloff L, Cheng J-H (2018) The role of extracorporeal shockwave treatment in musculoskeletal disorders. JBJS 100(3):251–63. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00661

Article  Google Scholar 

d’Agostino MC, Craig K, Tibalt E, Respizzi S (2015) Shock wave as biological therapeutic tool: From mechanical stimulation to recovery and healing, through mechanotransduction. Int J Surg Lond Engl 24(Pt B):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.030

Article  Google Scholar 

Sukubo NG, Tibalt E, Respizzi S, Locati M, d’Agostino MC (2015) Effect of shock waves on macrophages: a possible role in tissue regeneration and remodeling. Int J Surg Lond Engl 24(Pt B):124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.719

Article  Google Scholar 

Garibaldi R, Altomare D, Sconza C, Kon E, Castagna A, Marcacci M, Monina E, Di Matteo B (2021) Conservative management vs surgical repair in degenerative rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 25(2):609–619. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202101_24619

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sansone V, D’Agostino MC, Bonora C, Sizzano F, De Girolamo L, Romeo P (2012) Early angiogenic response to shock waves in a three-dimensional model of human microvascular endothelial cell culture (HMEC-1). J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 26(1):29–37

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viganò M, Sansone V, d’Agostino MC, Romeo P, PeruccaOrfei C, de Girolamo L (2016) Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutic target of biophysical stimulation for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. J Orthop Surg 11(1):163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0496-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Kisch T, Wuerfel W, Forstmeier V, Liodaki E, Stang FH, Knobloch K et al (2016) Repetitive shock wave therapy improves muscular microcirculation. J Surg Res 201(2):440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.11.049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang B, Zhou J, Banie L, Reed-Maldonado AB, Ning H, Lu Z et al (2018) Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes myogenesis through PERK/ATF4 pathway. Neurourol Urodyn 37(2):699–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23380

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Notarnicola A, Covelli I, Maccagnano G, Marvulli R, Mastromauro L, Ianieri G et al (2018) Extracorporeal shockwave therapy on muscle tissue: the effects on healthy athletes. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 32(1):185–193

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Auersperg V, Trieb K (2020) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an update. EFORT Open Rev 5(10):584–592. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190067

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gatewood CT, Tran AA, Dragoo JL (2017) The efficacy of post-operative devices following knee arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(2):501–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4326-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang CJ, Ko JY, Chou WY, Hsu SL, Ko SF, Huang CC, Chang HW (2014) Shockwave therapy improves anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Surg Res 188(1):110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.050

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bade MJ, Kittelson JM, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2014) Predicting functional performance and range of motion outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 93(7):579–585. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000065

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM (2003) Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain 4(7):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arena S (2017) Rate perceived exertion as a measure of exercise intensity. Home Healthc Now 35(10):570. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000614

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–83

Article  Google Scholar 

Tasso F, Simili V, Di Matteo B, Monteleone G, Martorelli F, De Angelis A, D’Amato T, Bovio M, Altomare D, Campofreda G, Marcacci M, Scardino M (2022) A rapid recovery protocol for hip and knee replacement surgery: a report of the outcomes in a referral center. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(10):3648–3655. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202205_28860

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS (2002) Statistical methods in medical research, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford

Book  Google Scholar 

Gautschi OP, Stienen MN, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Smoll NR (2017) Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in the timed up and go test after surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery 80(3):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001320

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danoff JR, Goel R, Sutton R, Maltenfort MG, Austin MS (2018) How much pain is significant? Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the visual analog scale for pain after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 33(7S):S71-S75.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.029

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park KB, Shin JS, Lee J, Lee YJ, Kim MR, Lee JH, Shin KM, Shin BC, Cho JH, Ha IH (2017) Minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit in pain, functional, and quality of life scales in failed back surgery syndrome patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(8):E474–E481. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001950

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2009) Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18(6):927–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maldonado DR, Kyin C, Owens JS, Rosinsky PJ, Jimenez AE, Lee MS, Domb BG (2022) Predictors of achieving the maximal outcome improvement threshold for willingness to undergo revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 50(8):2174–2180. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221096872

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ries AL (2005) Minimally clinically important difference for the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, Borg Scale, and Visual Analog Scale. COPD 2(1):105–110.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif