Introduction: Despite the significant stroke burden in the region, the RESILIENT trial remains the only randomized controlled trial (RCT) for stroke treatment in Latin America. Imbalances in baseline factors typically hamper comparisons between stroke populations. The Latin American Stroke Registry (LASE) is a registry of patients receiving tPA and thrombectomy from 17 centers across 9 countries. We compared the outcomes of LASE and RESILIENT at each cohorts baseline characteristics against models derived from other RCTs. <break><break>Methods: A systematic search identified RCTs that provided median NIHSS, mean age, percentage of patients receiving tPA, time-to-randomization, 90-day mRS0-2, and mortality. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model amongst 31 combinations of 5 variables. 90-day outcomes of LASE and RESILIENT were compared at their baseline values against the selected model. <break><break>Results: 35 RCTs encompassing 8376 subjects were identified. Models based on baseline NIHSS and the percentage of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) were considered the most optimum in terms of AIC. The LASE registry included 950 patients receiving IVT alone, 127 that received IVT and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and 101 receiving only MT. LASE & RESILIENT outcomes were plotted onto the models at their baseline values. LASE IVT alone group outcomes were in line with the RCT-informed model. LASE MT alone and MT + IVT, and the RESILIENT MT arm (68.5% IVT) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to no-MT. The RESILIENT control arm (71.8% tPA) had higher-than-expected mortality, while mortality of all other arms was within the predicted range. <break><break>Conclusion: <break>Functional outcomes and mortality of patients from the LASE and RESILIENT trial receiving MT and MT+IVT compared favorably to the 90-day functional and mortality outcomes predicted in a model derived from no-MT data from other stroke RCTs, indicating Latin American MT systems of care are comparable to those of more resourceful regions. Higher mortality from IVT in the RESILIENT trial requires further investigation.

P.M. and T.A.K. hold the copyright for pPREDICTS. They have no financial interest in its use. RGN reports consulting fees for advisory roles with Anaconda, Biogen, Cerenovus, Genentech, Philips, Hybernia, Imperative Care, Medtronic, Phenox, Philips, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Stryker Neurovascular, Shanghai Wallaby, Synchron, and stock options for advisory roles with Astrocyte, Brainomix, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Viz-AI, RapidPulse, and Perfuze. RGN is one of the Principal Investigators of the "Endovascular Therapy for Low NIHSS Ischemic Strokes (ENDOLOW)" trial. Funding for this project is provided by Cerenovus. RGN is the Principal Investigator of the "Combined Thrombectomy for Distal MediUm Vessel Occlusion StroKe (DUSK)" trial. Funding for this project is provided by Stryker Neurovascular. RGN is an investor in Viz-AI, Perfuze, Cerebrotech, Reist/Q'Apel Medical, Truvic, Vastrax, and Viseon.

No funding.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was exempt from IRB approval as it used already published datasets and RCTs.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes