Prevalence of pesticides in European water and relationship for public health: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: There is currently a growing interest in the so-called emerging pollutants, such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, personal hygiene care products, drugs, etc., whose presence in natural ecosystems is not necessarily recent, but the development in latest years of new and more sensitive methods of analysis have allowed their detection. They can be present in the natural environment, in food, and in many products of everyday origin, which suggests that human exposure is massive and universal. These contaminants correspond, in most cases, to unregulated substances, which may be candidates for future regulations, depending on research on their potential health effects and monitoring data regarding their prevalence. Therefore, the study of this type of substances is becoming one of the priority lines of research of the main agencies dedicated to the protection of public and environmental health, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or the European Union (EU). In this sense, it is of vital importance to know the nature and quantity of this type of contaminants, to establish preventive mechanisms that minimize their presence in the environment, including, of course, aquatic systems, with special requirements for water human consumption. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analyzes protocol is conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) statement guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The papers should include monitoring studies carried out in pesticides polluted waters in Europe. Prevalence studies of emerging contaminants (pesticides) in water resources (watersheds, aquifers, river, marine and springs), waste waters (influent and effluent) and drinking water should be included. Therefore, the comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, ScienceDirect. Two independent reviewers will conduct all study selection procedures, data extraction, and methodological evaluation, and disagreements will be referred to a third reviewer. RevMan 5.3 software will be used to gather data and perform the meta-analysis if possible. Discussion: This systematic review should provide evidence on the presence of pesticides in European waters in order to establish preventive mechanisms that minimize their presence in the environment. Dissemination and ethics: The findings of this scoping review will be disseminated in print, at conferences, or via peer-reviewed journals. Ethical approval is not necessary as this paper does not involve patient data. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022348332.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Yes, IDSFP. Finance Code 001. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br. Brasil (CAPES). Roled played: Data curation Resources

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Data Availability

All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif