Robotic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: A case series


  Table of Contents ORIGINAL ARTICLE Year : 2023  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 10-14

Robotic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: A case series

Gianluca Raffaello Damiani1, Mario Villa1, Giovanni Falcicchio1, Cristina Cesana1, Antonio Malvasi1, Nico Picardi1, Giovanni Vergottini2, Poli Piero2, Miriam Dellino1, Vera Loizzi1, Antonella Vimercati1, Ettore Cicinelli1, Antonio Pellegrino1
1 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Gynaecologic and Obstetrics Clinic, Policlinico di Bari, Italy
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASTT LECCO, Lecco, Italy

Date of Submission07-Jan-2022Date of Decision29-Jul-2022Date of Acceptance14-Sep-2022Date of Web Publication9-Feb-2023

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Gianluca Raffaello Damiani
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, 1 Clinic, Bari
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_7_22

Rights and Permissions


Objectives: Apical prolapse involves the upper vagina or vaginal vault after hysterectomy. Treatment is indicated for symptomatic women, and surgical approach is considered for women who failed or refused conservative therapy. We performed 10 pickups of autologous fascia, used for robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP).
Materials and Methods: We included patients between 60 and 80 years old who showed a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-q) over the second stage and with symptoms related to prolapse.
Results: All of them underwent autologous fascia lata (AFL) pickup from the right leg and after to RSCP. One patient underwent also posterior colporrhaphy. The mean intraoperative time was 199.2 min (183–230 min). No intra-operatory complications were reported. POP-q assessment during follow-up showed improvements: C point gained on average 7.6 points (5–8) and mean values went from −0.6 to − 8.2 cm (−7 to −9 cm). The three women who had anterior compartment defects shows good anatomical reconstitution with a mean Aa and Ba value of − 2.83 cm (−2.5 to −3 cm) and gained 4 points (average gain: 3.5–4.5 cm). Total vaginal lenght (TVL).
Conclusion: According to these data, in our experience, AFL employment showed a good anatomical result from the first to last follow-up.

Keywords: Fascia lata, graft, mesh, prolapse recurrence


How to cite this article:
Damiani GR, Villa M, Falcicchio G, Cesana C, Malvasi A, Picardi N, Vergottini G, Piero P, Dellino M, Loizzi V, Vimercati A, Cicinelli E, Pellegrino A. Robotic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: A case series. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2023;12:10-4
How to cite this URL:
Damiani GR, Villa M, Falcicchio G, Cesana C, Malvasi A, Picardi N, Vergottini G, Piero P, Dellino M, Loizzi V, Vimercati A, Cicinelli E, Pellegrino A. Robotic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: A case series. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 10];12:10-4. Available from: https://www.e-gmit.com/text.asp?2023/12/1/10/369418   Introduction Top

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition among women of all ages.[1],[2] The prevalence of POP varies depending on region or country from 3% to 50%.[3],[4] Frequently, women are asymptomatic: only 3% of US women report symptoms, but POP is detected in 41%–50% by examination.[5] Furthermore, POP symptoms are often less or not specific and women start to report symptoms when prolapse edge is 0.5 cm beyond hymenal ring.[5],[6] Apical prolapse involves the upper vagina or vaginal vault after hysterectomy. Treatment is indicated for symptomatic women, and surgical approach is considered for women who failed or refused conservative therapy.[1] Apical prolapse surgery goal is resuspending the upper vagina.[7],[8] There are many surgical routes to treat apical prolapse: sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is one of them[5],[7],[9] and robotic approach is a safe and effective choice.[8] Sacral colpopexy is considered the most effective and durable treatment for advanced apical prolapse.[10],[11] The goal is to resuspend the vagina to its anatomically correct position by securing the vaginal apex to the sacrum. This can be approached using a variety of techniques, including the use of either autologous tissue or mesh. In these series, we show our experience of autologous fascia lata (AFL) use performing robotic SCP (RSCP). The primary outcome was anatomic prolapse recurrence determined by the POP Quantification (POP-Q) examination.

  Methods Top

All preoperative and surgical procedures were performed at Alessandro Manzoni Hospital between December 2019 and October 2020. The study involves human study, but the IRB/IRC approval was exempted.

We included patients between 60 and 80 years old who showed a POP-q over the second stage and with symptoms related to prolapse with physical and mental ability to accomplish the 24-month follow-up. Patients with neuromuscular diseases (i.e., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, and myasthenia gravis) or trauma or previous surgery to the knee bilaterally were excluded from the study. Previous gynecologic surgery was not an exclusion criterion. All patients gave written informed consent before participating in the study. Preoperative evaluation included complete history collection, general clinical evaluation, gynecological clinical evaluation with preoperative POP-q assessment, clinical and invasive urodynamic examinations, orthopedic clinical evaluation, and routine blood tests. Patient data were extracted from medical records and patient surveys. Data analyzed included preoperative demographics, operative timing, postoperative hospital stay, surgical complications, and POP-Q examination. Complications were categorized using the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Mechanical and medical bowel preparation was administered to all patients the day before the surgery. Intravenous antibiotic was administered and anti-embolism devices were applied to each leg before anesthetic induction. The orthopedic surgery was performed before the gynecologic procedures. Preferably, AFL grafts were PICKED UP from the nondominant side IN PATIENTS WITH NO prior surgery IN THE SITE OF THE FASCIA SAMPLING. All patients were placed supine position. The lower limb was positioned on a leg holder roller with semi-bent thigh and flexed knee [Figure 1]. The sterile field was prepared from the thigh to the foot. The greater trochanter and lateral femoral condyle were identified and marked. A 15–20 cm longitudinal incision is carried out 5 cm distally and anteriorly to the greater trochanter. The incision moved down the fascia lata, hemostasis of the blood vessels was performed, and the fascia was exposed. Two autografts were harvested: the first from the posterior region (8 cm × 4 cm) and the second from the anterior region (10 cm × 3 cm) [Figure 2]. The sizes may vary depending on the indications of the gynecologist. The grafts were immediately placed into a sterile saline solution for later use. Accurate inspection of the incision was performed and layer incisional closure was carried out. Finally, a pressure dressing was applied to the wound. The patients then were reprepared in dorsolithotomy position for robot-assisted surgery, and an 18 French Foley bladder catheter was placed. We used Da Vinci Si robotic system: all four robotic arms and a 12 mm assistant port were utilized. A 12 mm camera port was placed periumbilically, pneumoperitoneum was obtained, and other ports were arranged in commonly “W” configuration. Patients were placed in 30° Trendelenburg position, and the robot was docked. Fenestrated bipolar forceps, camera, monopolar scissors, and ProGrasp forceps were, respectively, used in arms 1, 2, 3, and 4. The peritoneum overlying the sacrum was dissected, and the vertebral anterior longitudinal ligament was exposed. If required colon was reflected through laparoscopic bowel retractor how described by Burgess and Elliott (Burgess and Elliott, 2012). The anterior peritoneum and bladder were dissected from the anterior vaginal wall toward the introitus, and posteriorly, the peritoneal reflection was incised to ward off the rectum from the posterior vaginal wall and exposed off levator ani muscle fascia. A vaginal sizer was involved to supply countertraction during dissection. Then, the posterior graft was sutured to the posterior vaginal cuff wall through 3–4 interrupted sutures (Ethibond) and anchored to the levator ani muscle fascia through 2 interrupted sutures in Ethibond. The anterior graft was sutured to the anterior vaginal cuff wall through 3–5 interrupted sutures in Vicryl and one suture in Ethibond to the vertebral anterior longitudinal ligament after proper tightened [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. The peritoneum was closed by overlying the mesh with V-Loc 3-0. Finally, for all patients were applied a vaginal pack and ice pack on the thigh, while any drain was used.

Figure 2: The incision moved down the fascia lata, hemostasis was performed, and the fascia was exposed

Click here to view

Figure 3: The anterior graft was sutured to the anterior vaginal cuff wall through 3–5 interrupted sutures in Vicryl

Click here to view

Postoperative management included early mobilization: when possible patients were allowed to walk with crutches 1st–2nd day after surgery. The vaginal pack and the Foley were removed the day after surgery, and the postvoid residue was monitored. The anti-thrombus elastic stockings were kept for the duration of hospitalization. Generally, discharge was on the 2nd or 3rd postoperative day. Before, discharge we collected operative parameters: intra-operatory complications, hemoglobin losses, postsurgery complications, postvoid residue, and analgesic drug use.

Follow-up was performed 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Postoperative POP-q scores, harvest site morbidity, and operative parameters were recorded every time.

  Results Top

We considered 11 women who underwent RSCP with AFL use. The mean age was 71 years (61–78). The mean body mass index was 24.52 kg/m2 (18.3–32.5 kg/m2). All of them had vaginal delivery: three of them have three vaginal deliveries, three have two, and the last have only one. The mean age of menopause was 49.8 years (40–56 years), and 4 of 11 had iatrogenic menopause for gynecological surgery. Three women had a cancer history (ovarian, endometrial, and breast cancers). Comorbidity was poor: one patient had asthma and another one was a cardiovascular patient with carotid stenosis and angina. Eight patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy (VH) before our surgery: One of them performed also tension-free vaginal taping. The youngest woman underwent VH and anterior colporrhaphy and after it was performed laparoscopic SCP. Prior to surgery, the investigations showed urinary symptoms in two women as voiding difficulty with urinary residue. One of these two women had mixed incontinence and nycturia. Constipation and sexual dysfunction were reported in two patients. Each of them had II POP stadium except two patients with POP stage III. The mean C value was −0.6 cm (−1 to −3 cm) showing vaginal vault prolapse in all the patients. Three of them had conspicuous anterior prolapse with a mean Aa value of +1.16 cm (+1 to +1.5 cm) and a mean Ba value of +1.16 cm (+1 to +1.5 cm). Posterior compartment assessment showed a mean Ap value of −1.9 cm (−1 to −3 cm) and a mean Bp value of −1.7 cm (0 to −3 cm). All of them underwent AFL pickup from the right leg and after to RSCP. One patient underwent also posterior colporrhaphy. The mean intraoperative time (IOT) was 199.2 min (183–230 min). No intra-operatory complications were reported. The mean blood loss was 2.4 g/dl (1.2–4.5 g/dL). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were stopped on the 1st postoperatory day except for one patient who had temperature 72 h after surgery. Only three women had negative urinary residue on the 1st day whereas others on the 2nd day after surgery.

Follow-up showed improvement of urinary symptoms: only urge incontinence persisted in a woman who already had it, but stress urinary incontinence, nycturia, and voiding difficulty disappeared. Moreover, bowel symptoms were not at follow-up. Instead, sexual dysfunction persisted at follow-up in a patient who already had it. POP-q assessment during follow-up showed improvements: C point gained on average 7.6 points (5–8) and mean values went from −0.6 to −8.2 cm (−7 to −9 cm). The three women who had anterior compartment defects show good anatomical reconstitution with a mean Aa and Ba value of −2.83 cm (−2.5 to −3 cm) and gained 4 points (average gain: 3.5–4.5 cm). TVL was the same than prior to surgery unless for one case (from 9 to 3 cm). Posterior compartment showed also improvement with an average Ap and Bp value of −2.9 cm (−2.5 to −3 cm), respectively, with 1 cm and 1.2 cm of increment. The mean follow-up was of 17.4 months. No minor or major complications occurred. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.3 days (range: 2–3.2). After the intervention, there was a significant quantitative improvement of the parameters Ba, Bp, and C of the POP-Q score (P < 0.001). The objective cure rate at 24 months was 100%. No case required a laparotomic conversion; however, all the patients complained of a modest pain at the point of abdominal fixation of the autologous fascia. After 1-week follow-up, the surgical incisions were healing well and the patients were tolerating physical activity. At 2-year follow-up, available for all patients, no complications occurred and no recurrences were reported.

  Discussion Top

Abdominal SCP is an effective and safe surgical routine to treat vault prolapse, and we chose robotic approach for its advantages as a better vision during dissection to avoid intra-operatory complications and greater range of movement.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16], Moreover, RSCP shows a better anatomical cure rate than traditional abdominal route, and minimally invasive approach is associated with poor blood loss, less day of hospitalization, better recovery, and reduced morbidity.[5],[15],[17],[18] In fact we complications during surgery WERE NO REPORTED, with minimal blood loss in all the patient postoperatory pain was low ( mean vas score of 3) with short hospitalization time. Anatomical cure at every follow-up appointment was satisfactory for patients and even better clinical anatomic assessment through POP-q always showed increased values in all compartments (anterior, vault, and posterior). Moreover, our C point gain was similar to values reported by several authors all performing RSCP[19] and employing synthetic mesh.[20],[21],[22]

Synthetic mesh use is related to many complications such as mesh erosion and exposure, pelvic pain, and graft's infection: [21],[22],[23],[24] Employment of AFL may avoid mesh-related complications with the same anatomical and functional cure rate.[23],[24],[25] About efficacy, surgery repetition, and prolapse recurrence, biological graft showed similar results than synthetic mesh,[5],[7] while cadaveric fascia lata had a worse anatomical cure rate.[5],[7],[22] Conversely, AFL showed a good anatomic cure rate, improvement of symptoms, and low complications: furthermore, AFL seems a valid option for treating mesh complications where mesh needs to be removed.[24],[26],[27] According to these data, in our experience, AFL employment showed a good anatomical result from the first to last follow-up. Functional results are reassuring. RSCP with AFL improves urinary symptoms despite we not performed technique aimed to correct urinary dysfunction.[28] Robotic surgery also resolved bowel symptoms as described.[29] Contrariwise our expectations, sexual function was not improved by surgery although the patient went from POP-q II stage (prevailing anterior defect) to a complete anatomical restitution after treatment. We recorded a mean IOT of 199.2 min (183–230 min), less than other studies.[20],[24],[30] However. IOT of robotic-assisted procedures is higher than laparoscopic, open, and vaginal routes.[7]

  Conclusion Top

Robotic SCP is an effective and safe surgical approach to manage vault prolapse with poor blood loss, less day of hospitalization, and reduced morbidity. AFL showed a good anatomic cure rate, improvement of symptoms, and low complications and seems a valid option for treating mesh complications.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

  References Top
1.Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) – A new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life 2011;4:75-81.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Cvach K, Dwyer P. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Abdominal and vaginal approaches. World J Urol 2012;30:471-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Okcu NT, Gürbüz T, Uysal G. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021;50:101977.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1783-90.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society, INTERIM UPDATE: This Practice Bulletin is updated as highlighted to reflect the US Food and Drug Administration order to stop the sale of transvaginal synthetic mesh products for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2019;25:397-408.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Gutman RE, Ford DE, Quiroz LH, Shippey SH, Handa VL. Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:7.e1-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;10:CD012376.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Villa M, Sportelli C, Pezzotta MG. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: A case series of 31 patients by a single surgeon with a long term follow-up. Minerva Ginecol 2017;69:13-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Loverro G, Damiani GR, Loverro M, Muzzupapa G, Villa M, di Naro E. Surgical management of recurrence of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse after failure of Laparoscopic Lateral POP Suspension (LLPOPS): Initial report of six cases and outcomes at 2 years follow-up. Updates Surg 2020;72:225-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Cengiz H, Yildiz S, Alay I, Kaya C, Eren E, Iliman DE. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for advanced uterine prolapse: 12-month preliminary results of a randomized controlled study. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2021;10:30-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
  [Full text]  11.Obut M, Oğlak SC, Akgöl S. Comparison of the quality of life and female sexual function following laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in apical prolapse patients. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2021;10:96-103.  Back to cited text no. 11
  [Full text]  12.Hudson CO, Northington GM, Lyles RH, Karp DR. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014;20:252-60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Danforth TL, Aron M, Ginsberg DA. Robotic sacrocolpopexy. Indian J Urol 2014;30:318-25.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  14.Burgess KL, Elliott DS. Robotic/laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: A urology perspective. Urol Clin North Am 2012;39:349-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Ko KJ, Lee KS. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of apical compartment prolapse. Int Neurourol J 2020;24:97-110.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, Braga A, Torella M, Salvatore S, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2014;66:303-18.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Nosti PA, Umoh Andy U, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: A retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014;20:33-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, Smith B, Stroupe K, Rosenman A, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:5-12.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Kenton K, Mueller ER, Tarney C, Bresee C, Anger JT. One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22:382-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2011;17:44-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Bakir MS, Bagli I, Cavus Y, Tahaoglu AE. Laparoscopic pectopexy and paravaginal repair after failed recurrent pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2020;9:42-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
  [Full text]  22.Kotani Y, Murakamsi K, Kai S, Yahata T, Kanto A, Matsumura N. Comparison of surgical results and postoperative recurrence rates by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with other surgical procedures for managing pelvic organ prolapse. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2021;10:221-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
  [Full text]  23.Cundiff GW, Varner E, Visco AG, Zyczynski HM, Nager CW, Norton PA, et al. Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:5.e1-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 2013;309:2016-24.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Tate SB, Blackwell L, Lorenz DJ, Steptoe MM, Culligan PJ. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:137-43.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Scott VC, Oliver JL, Raz S, Kim JH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: Technique and initial outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:1965-71.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.Oliver JL, Chaudhry ZQ, Medendorp AR, Wood LN, Baxter ZC, Kim JH, et al. Complete Excision of sacrocolpopexy mesh with autologous fascia sacrocolpopexy. Urology 2017;106:65-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.Schachar JS, Williams KS, Winkler HA. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant midurethral sling: A 2-year follow-up of urinary symptoms and quality of life. J Midlife Health 2018;9:26-31.  Back to cited text no. 28
    29.Bradley CS, Nygaard IE, Brown MB, Gutman RE, Kenton KS, Whitehead WE, et al. Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:8.e1-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    30.Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:1005-13.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

 

Top

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif