Available online 2 February 2023, 101447
Author links open overlay panel, , , AbstractBackgroundPractitioners and researchers often adapt tools, practices, and programs to meet the needs of culturally diverse population groups, but do not consider populations with disability. While there is some research on guidelines for adapting evidence-based programs, there is no systematic process for adapting survey instruments. Rather than creating separate instruments for people with physical disabilities (PWD), it is critical that instruments are designed to capture data on people with and without disabilities for comparison purposes. Given the disproportionately high rates of physical inactivity and obesity in PWD, we developed a methodology to adapt an evidence-based physical activity instrument.
ObjectiveTo create a methodology to adapt surveys to be inclusive of PWD and use the methodology to adapt an evidence-based physical activity survey.
MethodsA framework was developed to adapt a physical activity survey instrument (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ) to be inclusive of PWD. The framework, referred to as SAVe-IT, includes five steps: Step 1) Select survey instrument to adapt; Step 2) Adapt the survey instrument; Step 3) Verify adaptations with experts; Step 4) Implement Pilot Test; Step 5) Test the tool to confirm reliability.
ResultsThe adapted IPAQ passed review by the expert panels and the pilot test (n=20). Assessment of test-retest reliability (n=30) yielded strong intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.950 for the total score for the whole sample, 0.950 for PWD (n=15) and 0.952 for people without disability (n=15).
ConclusionsThe SAVe-IT framework resulted in the successful adaptation of the IPAQ and can be used in populations with and without physical disabilities.
Section snippetsBackgroundThe epidemic of physical inactivity and obesity is one of the most significant public health problems in the United States (1, 2, 3). Physical inactivity and obesity are linked to a number of medical complications including higher rates of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, gall bladder and liver disease, certain forms of cancer, depression and other mental health disorders (4).
People with physical disabilities (PWD) are at a disproportionate risk for physical inactivity
MethodsThe adaptation process used in this study was derived from the work of Rimmer et. al who developed a set of evidence-informed guidelines for adapting obesity prevention programs for people with disabilities (20). The Guidelines, Recommendations and Adaptations for Including Disability (referred to as GRAIDs) was modified to adapt survey instruments. The GRAIDs components consisted of a) identifying relevant content experts including people with disabilities to serve as reviewers of the adapted
ResultsThe results of the SAVe-IT methodology are described under each step.
DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first study that developed and tested a methodology to adapt a popular physical activity survey instrument to be inclusive of PWD. The SAVe-IT framework provides a systematic process to accomplish this goal and contributes to the field of inclusion science (20, 35, 36) by promoting use of an existing physical survey instrument for PWD. Additionally, the SAVe-IT framework adds to the existing literature by providing a method for including PWD to the processes used
ConclusionThe lack of a systematic process for modifying existing survey instruments to be used with PWD has reduced our understanding of obesity and physical inactivity disparities between people with and without disabilities. PWD have disproportionately higher rates of obesity (5, 6, 7) and obesity-related comorbidities (7, 39, 40) and are therefore in need of obesity and weight management interventions relevant to their disability. The SAVe-IT framework provides a methodological process that can be
Funding:This work was supported by NCHPAD funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD), Grant #NU27DD000022. Funding supporting the postdoctoral training for Cassandra Herman provided by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) under grant 90ARCP0004
Author contributionsJGC conceptualized the methodology and was the primary contributor to this manuscript. CH and CCF contributed to the development of the framework and provided critical revisions to the manuscript. JHR was a key contributed to the content and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate:Approval for the pilot test and test-retest reliability was provided by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board (#300009073) and (#300009389) respectively.
Conflicts of Interest:The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements:The authors acknowledge those who participated in the adaptation panels as well as those who participated in the pilot test and evaluation of test-retest reliability for their time and efforts on this project.
References (40)A. Reichard et al.Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared to individuals with no disabilities in the United StatesDisability and Health Journal
(2011)
Y. Eisenberg et al.Evaluation of the Reaching People with Disabilities through Healthy Communities ProjectDisability and Health Journal
(2021)
W. Brown et al.Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveysJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
(2004)
W. ZhuReliability: What type, pleaseJournal of Sport and Health Science
(2013)
G. Lavelle et al.Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) as a measure of physical activity (PA) in young people with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional studyPhysiotherapy
(2020)
J.D. Akers et al.Daily Self-Monitoring of Body Weight, Step Count, Fruit/Vegetable Intake, and Water Consumption: A Feasible and Effective Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance ApproachJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
(2012)
C. Ogden et al.The epidemiology of obesityGastroenterol
(2007)
Rigby N, Leach R, Lobstein T et al. Epidemiology and social impact of obesity. In: Williams G, Fruhbeck G., editor....White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity. Solving the Problem of Childhood Obesity within a Generation. Washington,...Ma R, Ko GTC, Chan JCN. Health hazards of obesity: An overview. In: Williams G, Fruhbeck G., editor. Obesity Science to...Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disability and Health Promotion 2021 [Available from:...M.-K. Oh et al.Differences in obesity rates between people with and without disabilities and the association of disability and obesity: a nationwide population study in South KoreaJ Prev Med Public Health
(2012)
T.-H. Liou et al.Physical Disability and ObesityNutrition Reviews
(2005)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health, 2nd. Ed....H. Pain et al.The experience of being disabled and obeseDis Rehabil
(2006)
T.H. Liou et al.Physical Disability and ObesityNutr Rev
(2005)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disability and Obesity [Available from:...V.A. Catenacci et al.Physical activity patterns using accelerometry in the National Weight Control RegistryObesity
(2011)
J.E. Donnelly et al.American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adultsMedicine and science in sports and exercise
(2009)
P.N. Vieira et al.Correlates of health-related quality of life, psychological well-being, and eating self-regulation after successful weight loss maintenanceJournal of Behavioral Medicine
(2013)
View full text© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
留言 (0)