Oncology Research and Treatment
Roehrle J. · Kasper S. · Treckmann J.-W. · Markus P. · Schumacher B. · Albers D. · Wendling J. · Ting S. · Mende B. · Maßmann M. · Markus M. · Virchow I. · Rosery V. · Laue K. · Zaun G. · Kostbade K. · Pogorzelski M. · Reissig T.M. · Liffers S.-T. · Schmid K. · Schildhaus H.-U. · Schuler M. · Siveke J.T. · Wiesweg M.Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details AbstractIntroduction Systemic therapy is firmly established in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Clinical efficacy is still modest and options are limited. Combination therapy protocols such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/NP) define standard-of-care. Patients may receive a sequence of both regimens as first- and second-line palliative treatment. However, there is no guidance regarding a preferred order. Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, treatment trajectories and outcomes of patients with advanced PDAC treated at the West German Cancer Center Essen from 2014 to 2020 to inform treatment decisions with respect to predictive factors, impact of chemotherapy regimen sequence and maintenance treatment. Results We identified 170 patients with available follow-up. Of those, 160 (94.1%) pts received palliative CTX for primary metastatic, locally advanced or recurrent PDAC. Median PFS upon first palliative chemotherapy was 4.1 (3.1 – 5.9) months. First-line FOLFIRINOX associated with superior PFS (median 6.3 months) and OS (9.7 months, HR 0.7, p=0.03) as compared to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or other regimens (PFS 3.0, OS 6.9 months). However, OS benefit of first-line FOLFIRINOX was lost in patients who received at least two treatment lines (median OS 12.1 vs. 13.1 months, p=0.43). A landmark analysis of patients with clinical benefit (defined at CR/PR/SD for at least 20 weeks) upon first-line therapy revealed improved OS (HR 0.53, p=0.02) for patients receiving continued deescalated maintenance therapy. Second-line regimens resulted in similar PFS (overall log-rank p=0.92, median PFS2 2.3 (1.8-2.9), per-regimen median between 1.8 and 3.9 months). A previously established systemic inflammation score proved to be strongly prognostic and allowed identification of a patient subgroup with dismal prognosis (OS 2.9 vs. 11.4 months, HR 5.23, p
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)