Ascencio-Carbajal T, Saruwatari-Zavala G, Navarro-Garcia F, Frixione E. Genetic/genomic testing: defining the parameters for ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI). BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1): 156. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00720-5.

Gordon D.R, Koenig B.A. “If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data.” Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens. New Genetics and Society. 2022; 41(1): 23-46. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2007065.

Bak MAR, Ploem MC, Ateşyürek H, et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; 28: 403–16. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0503-5.

Dove ES, Chico V, Fay M, Laurie G, Lucassen AM, Postan E. Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives? J Med Ethics. 2019; 45(8): 504-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105229.

Tadros S, Carley H, Lucassen A. From beyond the grave: use of medical information from the deceased to guide care of living relatives. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2020; 8(4):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s40142-020-00196-6.

Boers SN, van Delden JJ, Knoers NV, Bredenoord AL. Postmortem disclosure of genetic information to family members: active or passive? Trends Mol Med. 2015; 21(3): 148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.01.002.

Shamsi-Gooshki E, Parsapoor A, Asghari F, et al. Developing "Code of Ethics for Medical Professionals, Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran". Arch Iran Med. 2020;23(10):658-664. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.83. (Supplementary file)

Radecki Breitkopf C, Wolf SM, et al. Attitudes toward return of genetic research results to relatives, including after death: comparison of cancer probands, blood relatives, and spouse/partners. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018; 13(3): 295-304. doi: 10.1177/1556264618769165.

Xia Y, Hong Q, Gao Z, Wang S, Duan S. Somatically acquired mutations in primary myelofibrosis: A case report and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2021; 21(3): 193. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9625.

Alshemmari SH, Rajan R, Emadi A. Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance of Driver Mutations in Primary Myelofibrosis: A Review. Med Princ Pract. 2016; 25(6): 501-509. doi: 10.1159/000450956.

Anonymous. Primary Myelofibrosis. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/primary-myelofibrosis/ (Access on 2022).

Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021; 96(1): 145-162. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26050.

Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(4): 392-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446.

Rothstein MA. Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives. Genet Med. 2018; 20(3): 285-90. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.257.

Gordon DR, Radecki Breitkopf C, Robinson M, et al. Should researchers offer results to family members of cancer biobank participants? A mixed-methods study of proband and family preferences. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019; 10(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1546241.

Ho A. Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008; 22(1): 128-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x.

Walter JK, Ross LF. Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics. 2014; 133 Suppl 1: S16-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3608D.

Dove ES, Kelly SE, Lucivero F, Machirori M, Dheensa S, Prainsack B. Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research? Clin Ethics. 2017; 12(3): 150-65. doi: 10.1177/1477750917704156.

McLaughlin J, Clavering E.K. Questions of kinship and inheritance in pediatric genetics: substance and responsibility. New Genetics and Society, 2011; 30(4): 399-413. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.592011.

Müller H, Rehmann-Sutter C (eds). Disclosure Dilemmas; Ethics of Genetic Prognosis after the 'Right to Know/Not to Know' Debate. USA: Routledge; 2016.

Konrad M. Narrating the New Predictive Genetics: Ethics, Ethnography and Science. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

Tylor B. Evolution & kinship ethics. Available from https://humansandnature.org/evolution-kinship-ethics/. (Accessed on 2022)

Clayton EW, Evans BJ, Hazel JW, Rothstein MA. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations. J Law Biosci. 2019; 6(1): 1-36. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz007.

Pugh J. Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics. UK: Oxford University Prss; 2020.

Anonymous. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-guidance-for-doctors---confidentiality-good-practice-in-handling-patient-information----70080105.pdf. (Accessed on 2022)

Chamsi-Pasha H, Albar M.A. Principles of Islamic medical ethics. Journal British Islamic Med Assoc. 2019; 1(1): 1-5.

Sachedina A. Islamic Biomedical Ethics Principles and Application. USA: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

Poorabhari-Langeroodi S, Asadinejad M. Place the patient in medical decisions. Medical Law Journal. 2013; 7 (27): 11-36. [In Persian]

Anonymous. The Civil Code of The Islamic Republic of Iran. Available from https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/49997adb27.pdf (Accessed on 2022).

Tariverdi S, Sadeghi MH, Abbasi M. The need to monitor the rules and regulations of organ donation in the Iranian legal system. MLJ 2021; 15(56): 611-24. [in Persian]

Saghi E, Hashemi Tonekaboni S M. A review of legal vacuums in the issue of transplanting organs taken from brain dead patients. Iran J Forensic Med. 2017; 23(1): 61-7. [In Persian]

Tassé AM. Biobanking and deceased persons. Hum Genet. 2011; 130(3): 415-23. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1049-y.

Fellmann F, Rial-Sebbag E, Patch C, Hentze S, Stefandottir V, Mendes Á, van El CG, Cornel MC, Forzano F; Public and Professional Committee (PPPC) of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG). ESHG PPPC Comments on postmortem use of genetic data for research purposes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; 28(2): 144-146. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0525-z.

The World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki- Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/#:~:text=1.,identifiable%20human%20material%20and%20data. (Accessed on 2022)