Cytogenetic and Genome Research
Novel Insights from Clinical Practice
Foucart C.a· Le Guyader G.a· Vequeau-Goua V.b· Gilbert-Dussardier B.a· Egloff M.a,caGenetics Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
bDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
cINSERM U-1084 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Expérimentales et Clinique, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: May 23, 2022
Accepted: August 24, 2022
Published online: December 08, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR
AbstractWe report a patient presenting with neurodevelopmental disorder, cleft palate, micrognathia, relatively mild microcephaly (−2 SD), and ventricular septal defect for whom a 9p terminal deletion was identified by aCGH at birth. The analyses of the samples taken prenatally showed that this terminal deletion resulted from the recombination of a dicentric chromosome which was transmitted to the zygote. Indeed, an inverted duplication with terminal deletion of the short arm of chromosome 9 [invdupdel(9p)] was found in a mosaic state in the placenta. To our knowledge, it is the first reported patient with a terminal deletion present in all tested cells of the blood associated with an invdupdel of the same chromosome in the placenta. This case highlights the role of postzygotic breakages of dicentric chromosomes, a possible underestimated mechanism of formation of terminal deletions. It raises the question of genetic counseling in cases of prenatally detected invdupdels.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
References Alfi O, Donnell GN, Crandall BF, Derencsenyi A, Menon R. Deletion of the short arm of chromosome no.9 (46,9p–): a new deletion syndrome. Ann Genet. 1973;16(1):17–22. Ballif BC, Yu W, Shaw CA, Kashork CD, Shaffer LG. Monosomy 1p36 breakpoint junctions suggest pre-meiotic breakage-fusion-bridge cycles are involved in generating terminal deletions. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(17):2153–65. Bonaglia MC, Kurtas NE, Errichiello E, Bertuzzo S, Beri S, Mehrjouy MM, et al. De novo unbalanced translocations have a complex history/aetiology. Hum Genet. 2018;137(10):817–29. Faas BHW, de Leeuw N, Mieloo H, Bruinenberg J, de Vries BBA. Further refinement of the candidate region for monosomy 9p syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(19):2353–6. Feldman GL, Weiss L, Phelan MC, Schroer RJ, Van Dyke DL. Inverted duplication of 8p: ten new patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47(4):482–6. Gardner RJM, Amor DJ. Gardner and Sutherland’s Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. Hauge X, Raca G, Cooper S, May K, Spiro R, Adam M, et al. Detailed characterization of, and clinical correlations in, 10 patients with distal deletions of chromosome 9p. Genet Med. 2008;10(8):599–611. Hulick PJ, Noonan KM, Kulkarni S, Donovan DJ, Listewnik M, Ihm C, et al. Cytogenetic and array-CGH characterization of a complex de novo rearrangement involving duplication and deletion of 9p and clinical findings in a 4-month-old female. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010;126(3):305–12. Huret JL, Leonard C, Forestier B, Rethoré MO, Lejeune J. Eleven new cases of del(9p) and features from 80 cases. J Med Genet. 1988;25(11):741–9. ISCN 2020. An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2020). Cytogenet Genome Res. 2020;160:341–503. Kawara H, Yamamoto T, Harada N, Yoshiura KI., Niikawa N, Nishimura A, et al. Narrowing candidate region for monosomy 9p syndrome to a 4.7-Mb segment at 9p22.2-p23. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(4):373–7. Madan K. Paracentric inversions: a review. Hum Genet. 1995;96(5):503–15. Onesimo R, Orteschi D, Scalzone M, Rossodivita A, Nanni L, Zannoni GF, et al. Chromosome 9p deletion syndrome and sex reversal: Novel findings and redefinition of the critically deleted regions. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(9):2266–71. Pedurupillay CRJ, Misceo D, Gamage TH, Dissanayake VHW, Frengen E. Post-zygotic breakage of a dicentric chromosome results in mosaicism for a telocentric 9p marker chromosome in a boy with developmental delay. Gene. 2014;533(1):403–10. Pramparo T, Giglio S, Gregato G, de Gregori M, Grazia Patricelli M, Ciccone R, et al. Inverted duplications: how many of them are mosaic? Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12(9):713–7. Rowe LR, Lee JY, Rector L, Kaminsky EB, Brothman AR, Martin CL, et al. U-type exchange is the most frequent mechanism for inverted duplication with terminal deletion rearrangements. J Med Genet. 2009;46(10):694–702. Schlade-Bartusiak K, Tucker T, Safavi H, Livingston J, van Allen MI, Eydoux P, et al. Independent post-zygotic breaks of a dicentric chromosome result in mosaicism for an inverted duplication deletion 9p and terminal deletion 9p. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(5):229–35. Swinkels MEM, Simons A, Smeets DF, Vissers LE, Veltman JA, Pfundt R, et al. Clinical and cytogenetic characterization of 13 Dutch patients with deletion 9p syndrome: Delineation of the critical region for a consensus phenotype. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(11):1430–8. Yu S, Graf W. Telomere capture as a frequent mechanism for stabilization of the terminal chromosomal deletion associated with inverted duplication. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010;129(4):265–74. Zuffardi O, Bonaglia M, Ciccone R, Giorda R. Inverted duplications deletions: Underdiagnosed rearrangements? Clin Genet. 2009;75(6):505–13. Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: May 23, 2022
Accepted: August 24, 2022
Published online: December 08, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)