Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the updated Sydney system and single biopsy

   Abstract 


Background: Updated Sydney system (USS) recommends taking biopsies from certain areas of the stomach for the diagnosis of precancerous lesions associated with Helicobacter pylori. Our aim was to evaluate the contribution of each of the biopsy sites to the diagnosis.
Methods: This prospective study included 97 patients aged 40 and over with dyspeptic complaints. Biopsies were taken from five regions: the lesser curvature of the antrum (LCA), the lesser curvature of the corpus (LCC), incisura angularis (IA), the greater curvature of the antrum (GCA), and the greater curvature of the corpus (GCC). Biopsy specimens were stained with hematoxylin–eosin stain, periodic acid Schiff–alcian blue, and Giemsa histochemical stain and evaluated according to the Sydney classification.
Results: Thirty-seven (38%) patients were positive for H. pylori in at least one biopsy site. Atrophic gastritis without intestinal metaplasia (IM) was found in 17 (17.5%) of the patients (6.2% in IA, 5.2% in each of LCA, GCA, and LCC, and 2% in GCC). The prevalence of atrophic gastritis with IM was 42.3% (21.6% in LCA, 20.6% in GCA, 20.6% in IA, 14.4% in LCC, and 5.2% in GCC). Endoscopic follow-up was planned in 21 (22%) patients due to the presence of extensive atrophy or incomplete IM. If a single biopsy of the LCA or a biopsy of both LCA and GCA was taken, endoscopic follow-up would have been missed in 12 (57%) or 6 (29%) patients, respectively.
Conclusion: Taking biopsies in accordance with the USS had higher sensitivity in detecting atrophic gastritis with or without IM compared to single biopsy. One or two biopsies is not sufficient to identify patients for whom endoscopic follow-up is recommended.

Keywords: Gastric Atrophy, Helicobacter pylori, intestinal metaplasia, updated Sydney system

How to cite this article:
Torun C, Yavuz A, Akan K, Seneldir H, Toksoz AN, Ulasoglu HC, Tuncer I. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the updated Sydney system and single biopsy. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2022;28:441-7
How to cite this URL:
Torun C, Yavuz A, Akan K, Seneldir H, Toksoz AN, Ulasoglu HC, Tuncer I. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the updated Sydney system and single biopsy. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 24];28:441-7. Available from: 
https://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2022/28/6/441/352455    Introduction Top

Gastric cancer ranks third in the world in malignancy-related deaths.[1],[2]Helicobacter pylori is the strongest recognized risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma.[3]

H. pylori infects approximately 50% of the world's population.[4] In H. pylori infection, the process that begins with chronic gastritis in the gastric mucosa may continue with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia (IM). Atrophic gastritis and IM are considered as precancerous lesions.[5] Early diagnosis of these precancerous lesions and treatment of H. pylori can slow down or prevent the development of gastric cancer.[6],[7],[8]

Recently developed endoscopic techniques such as chromoendoscopy (CE), narrow-band imaging, and magnifying endoscopy have improved the diagnosis of precancerous lesions.[9] These techniques are very valuable in guiding the selection of the biopsy site, but their use has not yet become widespread.

The Sydney System, created in 1990 at the World Congress of Gastroenterology and updated in 1994, recommended taking two biopsies each from the antrum and corpus and one biopsy from the incisura angularis (IA) during endoscopy, for the diagnosis of gastric diseases.[10],[11],[12] However, since increased number of biopsies creates disadvantages in terms of time, cost, and patient comfort, these recommendations are not followed frequently both in our country and in the world. There are few prospective studies investigating the contribution of each of the five biopsy sites recommended by the updated Sydney System (USS) in the diagnosis of H. pylori and precancerous gastric lesions.[13] Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of taking five biopsies according to USS instead of a single biopsy, for minimalization of missed diagnosis needing surveillance due to precancerous lesions.

   Patients and Methods Top

This prospective study included 97 patients aged ≥40 years who presented to the gastroenterology outpatient clinic with dyspeptic complaints (heartburn, bloating, or stomach pain) between November 2020 and February 2021. Patients with complaints of at least 1 month were included in the study.

Those who used proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) in the last 2 weeks, antibiotics and bismuth-containing drugs in the last 1 month, who had gastric malignancy, a history of gastric operation, pregnant ladies, and those who had previously received H. pylori eradication therapy were excluded from the study. All patients provided written informed consent for endoscopy, and the study was approved by the ethical committee of our institution. The principles of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed throughout the study.

Endoscopies were performed in the same clinic by two gastroenterologists. Initially, a single biopsy was taken from the lesser curvature of the antrum (LCA) for rapid urease test. The biopsy specimens were taken from the lesser and greater curvatures of the antrum, IA, and lesser and greater curvatures of the corpus into labeled formaldehyde bottles and sent for histopathologic examination.

Biopsy materials from each site were separately fixed in 10% neutral formaldehyde solution for a minimum of 6 h and a maximum of 24 h. In the macroscopic examination, biopsy materials were placed in coded cassettes according to their localization, by specifying their size and number of pieces, and wrapped in blotting papers, so that they would not be lost. After routine tissue follow-up (Leica TP1020; Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany), tissue samples were embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections prepared with a thickness of 4 μm from paraffin blocks in the microtome were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) stain in an automatic staining device, as well as with periodic acid Schiff–alcian blue (PASAB) and Giemsa histochemical stain. Then, the preparations were blindly examined histomorphologically by two pathologists specialized in gastroenterology, under a light microscope (Olympus Bx51). Pathologists consulted each other and wrote a consensus report in cases where they were in doubt.

In the histopathologic examination, chronic inflammation (lymphoplasmacytic inflammation), neutrophilic activation, IM, atrophy, and presence of H. pylori were evaluated according to Sydney classification. Giemsa stain was used to detect H. pylori. IM was evaluated using both H and E and PASAB stains and categorized as complete or incomplete type. Additionally, dysplasia, lymphoid aggregates, and lymphoid follicles were noted in the report.

Statistical analysis

The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analysis included Student's t-test for numerical and Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test for categorical comparisons, by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v20 (Armonk, NY, USA; IBM). A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

   Results Top

Ninety-seven patients were included in the study. Fifty-seven of the patients (58.8%) were female. The mean age was 51.9 ± 8.6 years, with a range of 40–79 years. Twenty-five of the patients (26%) were current smokers or had used more than 20 packs/year in the past and quit smoking. Seventy-two patients (74%) had never smoked. Two patients had a history of gastric adenocarcinoma in their first-degree relative. Fifty-three (54.6%) of the patients had active gastritis, and 40 (41.2%) had inactive gastritis. Gastric mucosa appeared normal only in four patients. Characteristics of patients are shown in [Table 1].

Thirty-seven (38%) patients were positive for H. pylori in at least one biopsy site (37.1% in LCA, 36% in greater curvature of antrum [GCA], lesser curvature of the corpus [LCC], and greater curvature of the corpus [GCC], and 34% in IA). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the rapid urease test were 91.8%, 95%, 91.8%, and 95.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of H. pylori between a single biopsy from any site and biopsies in accordance with the USS.

Atrophic gastritis without IM was determined in 17 (17.5%) of the patients (6.2% in IA, 5.2% in each of LCA, GCA, and LCC, and 2% in GCC). Taking biopsies in accordance with the USS had a higher sensitivity in detecting atrophic gastritis, compared to a single-site biopsy. Sensitivity of biopsy sites in the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis without IM is shown in [Table 2] (the case where five biopsies were taken in accordance with the USS was accepted as the reference value).

Table 2: Sensitivity of biopsy sites in the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis without intestinal metaplasia

Click here to view

Extensive atrophy with or without IM (atrophy of both antrum and corpus) was detected in nine (9%) patients. If a single biopsy were taken from the LCA or IA, as clinicians often do, extensive atrophy would have been missed in three (33%) and two (22%) patients, respectively. If two biopsies were taken from the LCA and GCA, extensive atrophy would have been missed in one (11%) patient.

Atrophic gastritis with IM was found to be more common in patients aged ≥50 years compared to those <50 years (P = 0.016).

Atrophic gastritis with IM was determined in 41 (42.3%) of the patients (21.6% in LCA, 20.6% in GCA, 20.6% in IA, 14.4% in LCC, and 5.2% in GCC). Sensitivity of biopsy sites in the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with IM is shown in [Table 2] (the case where five biopsies were taken in accordance with the USS was accepted as the reference value). Complete IM was present in 31 (31.9%) patients and incomplete IM in 19 (19.5%) patients.

Distribution of IM and its subtypes by site is shown in [Figure 1]. (Complete and incomplete IM were found together in GCA of two patients. Other biopsies revealed features of a single type of IM.)

Figure 1: Distribution of IM and its subtypes by site. GC = greater curvature, IM = intestinal metaplasia, LC = lesser curvature

Click here to view

IM was found to be more common in smokers than in nonsmokers (total IM P = 0.01, complete IM P = 0.042, and incomplete IM P = 0.005). Compared to patients under 50 years of age, patients aged 50 years and older had an overall increase in IM, but significant increase was found in complete IM (P = 0.015).

Compared to the H. pylori-negative patients, IM was more common in H. pylori-positive patients (P = 0.318). The frequency of IM in the GCC was found to be lower than in all other sites (P < 0.05). Taking biopsies in accordance with the USS had higher sensitivity in detecting IM, compared to single-site biopsy (P < 0.01).

If a single biopsy were taken from the LCA or IA, incomplete IM would be missed in 10 (53%) and 11 (58%) patients, respectively. If only one biopsy was taken from the GCA, IM would be missed in nine (47%) patients. If two biopsies were taken from the LCA and GCA, incomplete IM would be missed in five (26%) patients [Table 3].

Table 3: Sensitivity of biopsy sites in the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia

Click here to view

Endoscopic follow-up was planned in 21 (22%) of the patients due to the presence of extensive atrophy or incomplete IM. Neither atrophy nor IM was detected in 12 (57%) of these patients in LCA and IA, 10 (48%) in GCA, 18 (86%) in LCC, and 19 (90%) in GCC. [Table 4] and [Table 5] demonstrate how many of the patients would be missed for endoscopic follow-up if biopsies had been taken from a single site or from two or three sites.

Table 4: Frequency of precancerous lesions and failure to recognize patients requiring endoscopic follow-up if a single or two biopsies are taken

Click here to view

No adenocarcinoma was detected in any of the patients. Only two patients had “indefinite dysplasia” in the antrum and both patients had incomplete IM.

   Discussion Top

Several studies showed that virtual CE is a more accurate modality for diagnosing gastric precancerous conditions than white light endoscopy.[9],[14] However, new endoscopic techniques have not yet become widespread in Turkey as in many other developing countries. Therefore, the regions from where it would be more beneficial to take a biopsy for the diagnosis of precancerous conditions still remains an important issue.

Since the discovery of H. pylori, studies have been conducted to determine which part of the stomach would be more useful in the diagnosis of H. pylori during endoscopy. In some of these studies, H. pylori was found to be at a similar rate in all areas of the stomach,[15] while there was a significant difference in some other studies.[16],[17] In this study, we showed that taking a single-site biopsy enables detection of H. pylori in all infected patients.

To understand the reason for this difference between studies, it is necessary to remember the microbiological characteristics of H. pylori. Outer membrane proteins, which play a role in the adhesion of H. pylori to the gastric mucosa and initiation of inflammation, can bind to intact gastric mucosa.[18] Therefore, atrophic gastritis and IM sites are inhospitable to H. pylori.[19],[20]

After the general acceptance of the USS, studies on the effectiveness and adequacy of the biopsy protocol have been conducted. In the study of Satoh et al.,[16] one of the first prospective studies conducted for this purpose, it was revealed that biopsy should be taken from the LCA, GCA LCC, and GCC, as in the Sydney system, in order to evaluate H. pylori colonization and extension of the atrophy. In this study, endoscopy was performed in 76 patients with H. pylori (+) chronic gastritis. Similar to our study, H. pylori was detected equally in all regions, in patients with nonatrophic and mild atrophic gastritis. However, in the same study, H. pylori positivity was found to be higher in the GCC than in other regions in the presence of moderate and severe atrophy. The small number of patients (9%) with extensive atrophic gastritis in our study and the large number of patients with extensive atrophy in the study of Satoh et al. may explain this difference. Because of the presence of widespread and severe atrophy, H. pylori can colonize only in areas with intact gastric mucosa.[20],[21]

In another prospective study, Erikkson et al.[13] evaluated the diagnostic contribution of additional IA biopsy recommended in the USS. While H. pylori was detected only in IA in one (0.4%) of 272 patients, atrophy was detected in three (1.1%) patients and IM was detected in 13 (4.7%) patients only in IA biopsy. Routine biopsy of the IA would provide little additional clinical information compared to that obtainable from antrum and corpus biopsies.

In the study of el-Zimaity et al.,[22] patients with IM who had previously been biopsied with the mapping protocol were re-evaluated and it was investigated how many of the patients would have missed H. pylori and IM if biopsy was taken according to the USS. Both the original and the revised Sydney systems identified 100% of patients with H. pylori infection. Using the original Sydney recommendation, IM was found in only 48% of those with confirmed IM. The USS was more accurate, but IM was identified in only 75% of those already proven to have it.

It is estimated that the prevalence of H. pylori in developing countries, including our country, is around 50%.[23] Serological tests are frequently used in epidemiological studies. However, this test cannot distinguish current and past infection. The low prevalence of H. pylori in our study compared to other studies in developing countries may be related to the use of methods indicating only current infection. The high socioeconomic development level of the region where the study was conducted may also have contributed to this result.

Atrophic gastritis without IM was detected in 17 (17.5%) of the patients. Atrophy was most common in IA (6.2%), followed by the LCA, GCA, and GCC (5.2% each). Multiple-site biopsies had greater diagnostic power than single-site biopsies in the case of gastric atrophy.

IA is thought to undergo more severe atrophic, metaplastic, and chronic inflammatory changes than the other sites. Thus, the USS recommends taking a biopsy from IA as well as biopsies of the corpus and antrum. Studies following the USS also show that biopsy of IA has an additional contribution to the diagnosis of precancerous lesions.[24],[25],[26] The results of our study on atrophy are consistent with previous studies.

Gastric IM is considered to be a precancerous condition.[27] The prevalence of IM is variable due to the geographic variability in the frequency of gastric cancer and the different methods used in the studies. In a study conducted in Finland between 2000 and 2001, the prevalence of IM was found to be 19%.[24] Olmez et al.[28] reported that the prevalence of IM was 13.8% in 4050 patients who underwent gastric biopsy in the Van region of Turkey, where the incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma is relatively high. In the study of Almouradi et al.,[29] in which they evaluated the endoscopy of 437 patients in the USA, the prevalence of IM was found to be 15%. A study by Craanen et al.[30] from the Netherlands showed a 25.3% overall prevalence of gastric IM. Unlike other studies conducted in Europe, the prospective design of Caraanen et al.'s study and multiple antrum biopsies from each patient may have resulted in a higher prevalence of IM.

The overall prevalence of IM was 42.3%, with the complete type IM showing 31.9% and the incomplete type IM showing 19.5% prevalence in our study. The high prevalence of IM can be explained by the prospective design of our study and due to taking biopsies from each of the patients in accordance with the USS. The fact that all of the patients included in the study were ≥40 years old and had long-term dyspeptic complaints may also be the reasons.

The relationship between incomplete IM and gastric cancer is clear and requires endoscopic follow-up. However, endoscopic follow-up is not considered necessary in the presence of nonextensive complete IM.[2] Thus, it is important to distinguish complete and incomplete metaplasia in the pathological examination of endoscopic material in terms of cost-effectiveness.

In our study, taking five biopsies in accordance with the recommendations of the USS was found to be superior to biopsy from a single site in the diagnosis of IM (P < 0.05). Numerous studies have been conducted on the benefit of taking biopsies according to the USS, and it has been shown to be superior in the diagnosis of precancerous lesions, consistent with the results of our study.[31]

Our literature review showed that there are few prospective studies on the distribution of IM in the stomach. This study showed that IM was found to be more common in the lesser curvature compared to the greater curvature. The LCA, GCA, and IA are most prone to the development of IM. Similarly, in the study of Eriksson et al.[24] to measure the frequency of IM and its distribution in the stomach, IM was observed most frequently in the antrum and IA. In a retrospective study of 78,335 endoscopies performed in China between 2008 and 2013,[32] IA, LCA, and corpus were found to be most prone to the development of IM. These findings confirm our knowledge that chronic gastritis and atrophy begin from the antrum.

The USS and subsequent guidelines recommended taking two biopsies each from the antrum and corpus and one biopsy from the IA during endoscopy, for the diagnosis of gastric diseases.[2],[12]

However, it is common in clinical practice to take only one or two biopsies from the antrum properly due to time and cost concerns. In the study carried out to measure compliance with the Sydney system, gastric biopsy samples from a private pathology clinic between 2008 and 2011 were examined. Of the 379,667 patients with no visible lesions, none of the biopsy specimens were taken in accordance with the USS, showing that only 3.9% received two biopsies from the antrum and corpus.[31]

Patients with extensive atrophic gastritis, extensive IM, or focal incomplete IM should be followed up with a high-quality endoscopy every 3 years, according to the recently published guidelines on the management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II).[2]

In our study, if a single biopsy is taken from any site, due to false-negative results, endoscopic follow-up is neglected in almost one-half of the patients. It has been determined that the need for endoscopic follow-up in approximately one-third to one-fourth of the patients is missed if two biopsies are taken only from the antrum or one biopsy is taken from the antrum and corpus. The results show the importance of compliance with USS for accurate identification of patients who need endoscopic surveillance.

The fact that there are few prospective studies investigating the distribution of H. pylori and precancerous lesions in the stomach, increases the importance of our study. The use of tests showing only active infection may have underestimated the frequency of H. pylori. The clinical impact of the study results may be insufficient because of methodological limitations (relatively small sample and cross-sectional, observational, single-center study) that preclude a robust conclusion.

In conclusion, taking a biopsy from a single site seems to be sufficient for the diagnosis of H. pylori in patients without extensive atrophy. However, it is not reliable for the diagnosis of gastric atrophy with or without IM. Thus, our study confirms the importance of compliance with the USS in the diagnosis of H. pylori-associated precancerous lesions of the stomach.

One or two biopsies from the antrum or one biopsy from each of the antrum and corpus, which we frequently encounter in clinical practice, is not an appropriate approach in terms of endoscopic follow-up decision due to high false-negative results for precancerous lesions. We need more comprehensive studies emphasizing the importance of taking biopsies in accordance with the USS recommendations in clinics using white light endoscopy.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

   References Top
1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Marcos-Pinto R, Areia M, Leja M, Esposito G, et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy 2019;51:365-88.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade. J Dig Dis 2012;13:2-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Calvet X, Ramirez Lazaro MJ, Lehours P, Megraud F. Diagnosis and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2013;18(Suppl 1):5-11.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:784-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Hwang YJ, Kim N, Lee HS, Lee JB, Choi YJ, Yoon H, et al. Reversibility of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia after Helicobacter pylori eradication – A prospective study for up to 10 years. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47:380-90.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Sung JJ, Lin SR, Ching JY, Zhou LY, To KF, Wang RT, et al. Atrophy and intestinal metaplasia one year after cure of H. pylori infection: A prospective, randomized study. Gastroenterology 2000;119:7-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Meining A, Morgner A, Miehlke S, Bayerdorffer E, Stolte M. Atrophy-metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in the stomach: A reality or merely an hypothesis? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2001;15:983-98.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Lage J, Abrantes D, Coimbra M, Esposito G, et al. A multicenter prospective study of the real-time use of narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of premalignant gastric conditions and lesions. Endoscopy 2016;48:723-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Tytgat GN. The Sydney System: Endoscopic division. Endoscopic appearances in gastritis/duodenitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991;6:223-34.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Price AB. The Sydney System: Histological division. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991;6:209-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1161-81.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Eriksson NK, Farkkila MA, Voutilainen ME, Arkkila PE. The clinical value of taking routine biopsies from the incisura angularis during gastroscopy. Endoscopy 2005;37:532–6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.Ang TL, Pittayanon R, Lau JY, Rerknimitr R, Ho SH, Singh R, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison between high-definition white light endoscopy and narrow band imaging for detection of gastric lesions. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;27:1473-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Genta RM, Graham DY. Comparison of biopsy sites for the histopathologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: A topographic study of H. pylori density and distribution. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:342-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Satoh K, Kimura K, Taniguchi Y, Kihira K, Takimoto T, Saifuku K, et al. Biopsy sites suitable for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and the assessment of the extent of atrophic gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:569-73.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Dursun M, Yilmaz S, Yukselen V, Kilinc N, Canoruc F, Tuzcu A. Evaluation of optimal gastric mucosal biopsy site and number for identification of Helicobacter pylori, gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:1732-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Ishijima N, Suzuki M, Ashida H, Ichikawa Y, Kanegae Y, Saito I, et al. BabA-mediated adherence is a potentiator of the Helicobacter pylori type IV secretion system activity. J Biol Chem 2011;286:25256-64.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Graham DY, Shiotani A. The time to eradicate gastric cancer is now. Gut 2005;54:735-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Kikuchi S. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2002;5:6-15.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Wyatt JI, Rathbone BJ, Heatley RV. Local immune response to gastric Campylobacter in non-ulcer dyspepsia. J Clin Pathol 1986;39:863-70.  Back to cited text no. 21
    22.El-Zimaity HM, Graham DY. Evaluation of gastric mucosal biopsy site and number for identification of Helicobacter pylori or intestinal metaplasia: Role of the Sydney System. Hum Pathol 1999;30:72-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    23.Zamani M, Ebrahimtabar F, Zamani V, Miller WH, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Shokri-Shirvani J, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47:868-76.  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Eriksson NK, Karkkainen PA, Farkkila MA, Arkkila PE. Prevalence and distribution of gastric intestinal metaplasia and its subtypes. Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:355-60.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Isajevs S, Liepniece-Karele I, Janciauskas D, Moisejevs G, Funka K, Kikuste I, et al. The effect of incisura angularis biopsy sampling on the assessment of gastritis stage. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:510-3.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Varbanova M, Wex T, Jechorek D, Rohl FW, Langner C, Selgrad M, et al. Impact of the angulus biopsy for the detection of gastric preneoplastic conditions and gastric cancer risk assessment. J Clin Pathol 2016;69:19-25.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: A multistep and multifactorial process--First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res 1992;52:6735-40.  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.Olmez S, Aslan M, Erten R, Sayar S, Bayram I. The prevalence of gastric ıntestinal metaplasia and distribution of helicobacter pylori ınfection, atrophy, dysplasia, and cancer in ıts subtypes. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015;2015:434039.  Back to cited text no. 28
    29.Almouradi T, Hiatt T, Attar B. Gastric ıntestinal metaplasia in an underserved population in the USA: Prevalence, epidemiologic and clinical features. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013;2013:856256.  Back to cited text no. 29
    30.Craanen ME, Dekker W, Blok P, Ferwerda J, Tytgat GN. Intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori: An endoscopic bioptic study of the gastric antrum. Gut 1992;33:16-20.  Back to cited text no. 30
    31.Lash JG, Genta RM. Adherence to the Sydney System guidelines increases the detection of Helicobacter gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in 400738 sets of gastric biopsies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;38:424-31.  Back to cited text no. 31
    32.Mao XY, Xu SF, Liu Q, Jiang JX, Zhang HH, Sang HM, et al. Anatomical predilection of intestinal metaplasia based on 78,335 endoscopic cases. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016;22:154-60.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Cundullah Torun
Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Province of Istanbul, District of Kadiköy, Neighbourhood of Egitim – 34722
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_146_22

Rights and Permissions


  [Figure 1]
 
 
  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif