Prevalence and Area of Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Outer Retinal Atrophy in eyes with Non-Exudative Macular Neovascularization

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details Abstract

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of complete Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA) in patients with unilateral exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) of the fellow eye and establish if the presence of non-exudative macular neovascularization (NE-MNV) influences the prevalence of RPE and outer retinal atrophy in eyes with AMD. Methods: Observational cross-sectional study of 68 patients with unilateral exudative AMD. Demographic and clinical data were collected and multimodal retinal imaging was performed in all patients. Two groups of patients were defined according to the presence (NE-MNV) or absence (No NE-MNV) of NE-MNV in the study eye. We compared the prevalence of tomographic cRORA and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) geographic atrophy (GA) and differences in cRORA greatest linear diameter (GLD) and GA area between groups. Results: Globally, cRORA was present in 11 eyes (16.2%), FAF GA was present in 10 eyes (14.7%) and NE-MNV was present in 10 eyes (14.7%) of patients with unilateral exudative AMD of the fellow eye. The overall cRORA GLD was 1950.64 ± 1428.31 μm and the mean area of GA was 9.25 ± 7.50 mm2. Regarding comparisons between groups, cRORA was present in 9 eyes (15.5%) without NE-MNV and in 2 eyes (20%) with NE-MNV (p=0.66). Tomographic signs of atrophy were more frequent in eyes with NE-MNV (50% vs. 24.1% in eyes without NE-MNV; p=0.008). No significant differences were found in cRORA GLD (p=0.30) between groups. Eyes with NE-MNV and eyes without NE-MNV had a similar prevalence of FAF GA (2 eyes out of 10 and 8 eyes out of 58, respectively; p=0.64). Eyes with NE-MNV had a smaller mean area of GA (2.07±0.24 mm2 vs. 11.05±7.34 mm2; p=0.01). Conclusion: In our study, the presence of NE-MNV was not associated with the prevalence of cRORA and/or FAF GA. Nonetheless, eyes with NE-MNV presented smaller areas of GA, which suggests that this type of neovascularization may prevent the progression of RPE and outer retinal atrophy. Longitudinal studies are required to confirm these preliminary results.

S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif