Smartphone excessive use, sleep, and beliefs about well-being in university students who practice yoga compared with those with no experience of yoga



   Table of Contents     SHORT COMMUNICATION   Year : 2022  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 292-295  

Smartphone excessive use, sleep, and beliefs about well-being in university students who practice yoga compared with those with no experience of yoga

Sushma Pal, Sachin Kumar Sharma, Aditi Singhal, Shirley Telles
Department of Patanjali Research Foundation, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India

Date of Submission22-Mar-2021Date of Acceptance21-Dec-2021Date of Web Publication11-Jul-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shirley Telles
Patanjali Research Foundation, Patanjali Yogpeeth Phase 1, Haridwar, Uttarakhand 249405
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_601_21

Rights and Permissions

     Abstract 


Background: Addictive behavior can be effectively managed with yoga. This study compared smartphone use, self-rated sleep, and beliefs about well-being in university students who practiced yoga regularly with those who did not. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-two university students (average age ± standard deviation: 20.2 ± 2.2; male: female = 1:1) who practiced yoga (90 min a day, 6 days a week, and 29.7 months) were compared for smartphone excessive use, self-rated sleep, and beliefs about well-being, with an equal number of comparable age- and gender-distributed university students who did not practice yoga. Results: The yoga group had lower scores on the short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale with fewer nocturnal episodes of checking their smartphone. The nonyoga group reported longer nocturnal sleep time compared to the yoga group, whereas there was no significant difference in the beliefs about well-being scores between the two groups. Conclusions: University students who practice yoga may be less likely to use a smartphone excessively as well as have uninterrupted sleep than students who do not practice yoga.

Keywords: Beliefs about well-being, excessive smartphone use, self-rated sleep, university students, yoga


How to cite this article:
Pal S, Sharma SK, Singhal A, Telles S. Smartphone excessive use, sleep, and beliefs about well-being in university students who practice yoga compared with those with no experience of yoga. Indian J Community Med 2022;47:292-5
How to cite this URL:
Pal S, Sharma SK, Singhal A, Telles S. Smartphone excessive use, sleep, and beliefs about well-being in university students who practice yoga compared with those with no experience of yoga. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 12];47:292-5. Available from: 
https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2022/47/2/292/350352    Introduction Top

Excessive use of a smartphone has detrimental effects on health and overall functioning[1] with features in common with addictive behaviors.[2] In university students, high levels of smartphone use and poor sleep quality correlated positively with levels of depression.[3]

University students who practiced 1 h of mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral intervention (MBCBI) for 8 weeks showed less desire to use a smartphone, compared to a control group.[4] Yoga practice like MBCBI also includes suggestions for awareness.[5] Yoga was an effective strategy to manage chemical addictive behavior and substance abuse.[6] In addition, yoga practice influenced well-being[7] and the perceptions about well-being,[8] which can influence the recovery from addiction.[9]

The present study compared two groups of university students, of whom one group practiced yoga regularly whereas the other group did not practice yoga and continued their routine activities. The yoga practices included asana (posture), yoga breathing (pranayama), meditation (dhyana), and guided relaxation. The two groups were compared for (i) smartphone excessive use, (ii) beliefs about well-being, and (iii) self-rated quality of sleep.

   Materials and Methods Top

A cross-sectional study design was used to administer questionnaires to two groups of students. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (approval number: YRD-018/02). One hundred and forty-two university students from North India formed the yoga group. Students practiced yoga between 05:30 and 07:00 h in the morning. An equal number of students from a nearby university formed the nonyoga group. The groups had comparable socioeconomic backgrounds and leisure interests. All students used a smartphone to communicate but not for studies. Students were included in the research if they (i) used a smartphone and (ii) had at least 3 months of yoga practice (yoga group) and no prior experience of yoga (nonyoga group). Students were excluded from the study if they did not complete the questionnaires. Both groups of students were informed about the study and its aims. The students were asked to fill in their details in a sociodemographic form to indicate individual consent, and permission to conduct the study was obtained from registrars of the universities.

Yoga practice

The yoga group had an average of 29.7 months of experience of yoga. Students practiced yoga in group classes on 6 successive days in a week for 90 min per day between 05:30 and 07:00 h in the morning. The yoga practice included loosening exercises,[10] yoga postures (asanas), yoga breathing (pranayamas), and guided relaxation. The session was conducted by a yoga teacher with a minimum of 5 years of experience of teaching yoga.

Assessments

Demographic information

Students were asked the following: (i) their name, date of birth, gender, and number of years of education completed and (ii) duration of yoga practice in months (yoga group alone).

Smartphone use

Smartphone addiction scale-short version

The Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version (SAS-SV) assesses levels of smartphone use.[11] This scale consists of ten items with six possible response options to each item which are strongly disagree, disagree, weakly disagree, weakly agree, agree, and strongly agree. The scale has been used in an Indian population.[12] The total scores of SAS-SV lie between 10 and 60, with 10 being “low”, and 60 being “high” level of smartphone addiction. According to Kwon et al.,[11] high level of addiction was defined by a score between 34 and 60 in females and 32 and 60 in males.[12]

Self-rating about smartphone

(i) Use of a smartphone or not, (ii) the chief purposes of smartphone use, and (iii) whether they woke up at night to check their smartphone.

Sleep rating questionnaire

The sleep rating questionnaire (SRQ) assessed the quality of sleep of preceding week. The questionnaire has been used in an Indian population.[13] It has seven questions, of which the response to four questions was given as quantitative data (i.e., how long does it take you to fall asleep (in minutes)?, how many hours do you sleep each night?, how many times do you wake up during the night?, and how long do your day time naps last (in minutes)?). The responses to the remaining two questions (i.e., do you feel rested in the morning? and do you sleep in day time?) provided nominal data, whereas one provided qualitative data as it was an open-ended question (i.e., the usual reasons for waking up if you do so?).

The beliefs about well-being scale 16 (BWBS)

The Beliefs about Well-Being Scale consists of 16 items measured on a seven-point Likert scale in which three points are described as 1 = “strongly disagree”, 4 = “neutral”, and 7 = “strongly agree.”[14] BWBS assesses four domains of mental well-being. These four domains are (i) the experience of pleasure, (ii) avoidance of negative experience, (iii) self-development, and (iv) contribution to others. All four are positively correlated with well-being and higher scores indicate better well-being.[14]

Data analysis

Two statistical tests were performed using SPSS (Version 24.0) (IBM SPSS statistics City: Armonk State: New York Country: United States), i.e., independent t-test and Chi-square test. The two groups were compared with multiple independent t-tests which were Bonferroni corrected. The following four items were compared with Chi-square test, (i) from SRQ (a) a feeling of being refreshed in the morning and (b) daytime sleep, (ii) number of addicted students in yoga and nonyoga group based on SAS scores which were categorized as high and low scores to classify excessive smartphone users,[8] and (iii) self-reported checking of smartphone at night.

   Results Top

Results are presented under the three categories, i.e., smartphone excessive use, self-rated sleep, and beliefs about-wellbeing with details about the participants and group average values ± standard deviation values which are presented in [Table 1].

SAS scores and self-rated smartphone use

A whole group comparison: SAS-SV scores were higher in the nonyoga group compared to the yoga group (P < 0.001). (ii) A gender-wise comparison: the difference of SAS-SV scores was higher among males (P < 0.001) compared to females. The mean scores of SAS-SV are presented in [Table 2].

Table 2: Unpaired t-test for smart phone addiction, beliefs about well-being, and sleep quality in yoga and yoga naïve students

Click here to view

The number of students with high SAS scores was significantly different between the yoga (i.e., 34 out of 142) and nonyoga (i.e., 61 out of 142) groups (χ2 = 11.53, P = 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.201). The details of the scores are provided in the following [Table 3].

Fewer students of the yoga group (37 out of 142) woke up at night one or more times to check their smartphone for messages compared to the nonyoga group (48 out of 142) (χ2 = 5.66, P = 0.0173, Cramer's V = 0.15).

Self-rated sleep

The duration of nocturnal sleep in minutes was significantly higher in the nonyoga group compared to the yoga group (P < 0.001).

A greater number of students of the yoga group (105 out of 142) reported daytime sleep compared with the nonyoga group (87 out of 142; χ2 = 5.209, P = 0.022, Cramer's V = 0.134).

The beliefs about well-being

There was no significant difference between yoga and nonyoga groups for components of the beliefs about well-being.

   Discussion Top

One hundred forty-two yoga practitioners (age range 16–28 years; average age 20.2 ± 2.2 years; M:F = 1:1) had lower smartphone addiction than yoga naïve (age range 18–25 years; average age: 19.7 ± 1.5 years, M: F = 1:1). The differences between groups were considered to be an effect of yoga practice since the groups were of comparable ages, gender ratio, years of formal education, social support (most students of both groups stayed in a student hostel), and leisure interests (both groups were from the same town). Yoga practice includes several dimensions considered relevant in managing substance abuse and chemical addictions.[6] These include: (i) stress reduction, (ii) positive affect, (iii) improved self-awareness, (iv) improved self-esteem, and (iv) a chance to experience feelings of transcendence through yoga. Similar factors may help students regulate smartphone use.

In the present cross-sectional study, the two groups were not recruited from the same university. Students who practiced yoga regularly were enrolled for a course in yoga. All students of the course were required to join yoga practice sessions. The students who had no experience of yoga were recruited from a university in the same locality as the students of the yoga group. While the two groups had comparable ages, gender ratios, hours of study, social support in student hostels, and possibilities for leisure activities in the area, there were other factors which could have influenced the students' smartphone addictive behavior. These include personality-related factors and levels of physical activity. Personality-related factors associated with predicted smartphone addiction.[15]

Yoga practice increases the level of physical activity while modifying the breath and the mental state.[16] Increased physical activity can serve as a rehabilitation for Internet addiction by improving physical health and increasing confidence, satisfaction, and well-being.[17] Hence, yoga practice may have reduced students' smartphone use by increasing their feelings of confidence and self-esteem which were not assessed in this study. However, even though perceptions about gratification, reward, and factors contributing to well-being influences susceptibility to addictive behavior,[18] the two groups did not differ in their beliefs about well-being.

The university students of the yoga group spent significantly less time asleep in the night than the group who did not practice yoga (with average values of 375 and 411 min, respectively), with fewer nocturnal awakenings to check their smartphone. Previously, yoga practice was associated with better quality of self-reported sleep, especially in the elderly.[19] The yoga group in the present study may have experienced better quality of nocturnal sleep hence reducing their nocturnal sleep requirement, while they did have more daytime sleep.

Limitation

Ideally all students should have been recruited from the same university, with random assignment of one group to yoga and other students to an observation control group. In the present study, the cross-sectional assessment of two student groups from different universities makes it difficult to rule out confounding factors, especially since students who practiced yoga were enrolled in a study program on yoga. A longitudinal, interventional study would address these concerns.

   Conclusions Top

The present study suggests that university students who practice yoga have lower SAS-SV as well as have uninterrupted nocturnal sleep, compared to university students from the same geographical region, age, and gender distribution who did not practice yoga. However, the perception of well-being did not differ between the two groups.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

   References Top
1.Choi SW, Kim DJ, Choi JS, Ahn H, Choi EJ, Song WY, et al. Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and internet addiction. J Behav Addict 2015;4:308-14.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Lin YH, Chiang CL, Lin PH, Chang LR, Ko CH, Lee YH, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163010.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Demirci K, Akgönül M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J Behav Addict 2015;4:85-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Lan Y, Ding JE, Li W, Li J, Zhang Y, Liu M, et al. A pilot study of a group mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for smartphone addiction among university students. J Behav Addict 2018;7:1171-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Sirswal DR. Yoga and mental health: Applying yoga philosophy for well-being. Intellect Quest 2019;12:47-54.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Khalsa SB, Khalsa GS, Khalsa HK, Khalsa MK. Evaluation of a residential kundalini yoga lifestyle pilot program for addiction in India. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2008;7:67-79.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Woodyard C. Exploring the therapeutic effects of yoga and its ability to increase quality of life. Int J Yoga 2011;4:49-54.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  8.Macdonald DA, Friedman HL. Measures of spiritual and transpersonal constructs for use in yoga research. Int J Yoga 2009;2:2-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  9.Van Gordon W, Shonin E, Diouri S, Garcia-Campayo J, Kotera Y, Griffiths MD. Ontological addiction theory: Attachment to me, mine, and I. J Behav Addict 2018;7:892-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Balkrishana A. Daily Yoga Practice Routine. 1st ed. Haridwar: Divya Prakashan; 2015. p. 10-69.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 2013;8:e83558.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.Mangot AG, Murthy VS, Kshirsagar SV, Deshmukh AH, Tembe DV. Prevalence and pattern of phantom ringing and phantom vibration among medical interns and their relationship with smartphone use and perceived stress. Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40:440-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  13.Manjunath NK, Telles S. Influence of yoga and ayurveda on self-rated sleep in a geriatric population. Indian J Med Res 2005;121:683-90.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.McMahan EA, Estes D. Measuring lay conceptions of well-being: The beliefs about well-being scale. J Happiness Stud 2011;12:267-87.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Kim Y, Jeong JE, Cho H, Jung DJ, Kwak M, Rho MJ, et al. Personality factors predicting smartphone addiction predisposition: Behavioral inhibition and activation systems, impulsivity, and self-control. PLoS One 2016;11:e0159788.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Jahan I, Begum M, Akhter S, Islam MZ, Jahan N, Haque M. Effects of alternate nostril breathing exercise on respiratory functions in healthy young adults leading stressful lifestyle. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2020;27:e104-14.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Kim H. Exercise rehabilitation for smartphone addiction. J Exerc Rehabil 2013;9:500-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. Addiction and free will. Addict Res Theory 2009;17:231-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Bankar MA, Chaudhari SK, Chaudhari KD. Impact of long term yoga practice on sleep quality and quality of life in the elderly. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2013;4:28-32.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  

 
 


  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
  Top Print this article  Email this article            

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif