The Conundrum of Dystonia in Essential Tremor Patients: How does One Classify these Cases?

Expert synopses Expert 1

Although I could easily pass case 1 as ET, there are in my view several subtle signs of dystonia. In addition, the enhancement of the head tremor by vocalization and hypomimia (mild Parkinsonism) inclines me towards dystonic tremor. In case 2, the left little finger extension on pouring and walking (and also abduction), right wrist flexion in batswing position and left index finger pointing on walking incline me towards dystonic tremor. In case 3, the only dystonic feature is the flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the left middle finger. Providing this does not have another cause, this would incline me towards dystonic tremor. It is an isolated sign so I would make a diagnosis of possible dystonic tremor. Otherwise the diagnosis would have been ET. In case 4, the jerky nature of this tremor, with flurries, the left index finger extension and wrist flexion with splayed and spooned fingers lead me to diagnose dystonic tremor. In case 5, the patient’s neck flexion and right index finger pointing on walking as well as left middle finger flexion at the metacarpophalangeal joint and hyperextension of the left ring finger at the distal interphalangeal joint lead me to diagnose dystonic tremor. When several of these ‘soft dystonic signs’ are present, my confidence in making a diagnosis of dystonic tremor increases.

Expert 2

These patients aged 72 – 88 years were diagnosed with ET. Diagnosis was based on the observation of bilateral action tremor in the upper limbs starting at 14 – 50 years of age. Signs of dystonia were not reported. The significance of mild dystonic posturing of the hands and/or fingers coexisting with tremor in all patients remains unclear since it may be also an occasional finding in otherwise healthy individuals. However, the frequency of this sign in normal people and its relationship with age are unknown. Likewise, it is unknown whether the frequency of dystonic posturing of the hands/fingers is greater in relatives of dystonic patients than in normal subjects. Information on these issues would help to advance our knowledge about the relationship between mild dystonic signs and ET. Regardless, I assigned dual diagnoses of ET and dystonia to each of these five cases.

Expert 3

In all cases, I assigned diagnoses of ET, but in two of them, I also diagnosed dystonia. The frequent co-existence of dystonia and ET-like tremor, and family history of both or either suggests that the two disorders share pathophysiologic mechanisms, but the nature of the relationship is still poorly understood. Dystonic tremor syndrome represents conditions where dystonia is the predominant neurological feature and tremor manifests in the body part associated with dystonia. One of the characteristic features of dystonic tremor, besides its irregularity, is “null point”. This is a position of the tremulous body part in which the tremor diminishes or resolves as the body part is allowed to assume the maximal dystonic posture [18]. Unfortunately, viewing of a video recording is not conducive to detect null point, a limitation of this study. If a patient with dystonia has a tremor in a non-dystonic body part, the tremor is described as “tremor associated with dystonia” [19]. While dystonic tremor can affect any of the body parts with dystonia, it is most frequently found in patients with cervical dystonia (as head tremor). Several early studies have demonstrated that about 25% of patients with cervical dystonia had tremor in their hands that is phenomenologically similar to ET [7]. In a more recent study of 2,362 patients enrolled in the Dystonia Coalition project, 53.3% had tremor, mostly involving the head, followed by the upper limbs and other body regions [20]. Dystonic tremor occurred in 36.9% to 48.4% of patients, but others had ET-like tremors.

Expert 4

Experts define ET as an isolated tremor syndrome of upper limb action tremor, designating ET plus if additional non-diagnostic neurological signs are present, including “questionable dystonic posturing,” subject to interpretation [13]. All cases display bilateral action tremors, consistent with ET. The cases demonstrate a range of subtle dystonic features. Dystonia is defined by muscle contractions causing abnormal movements or postures, often repetitive [21]. Case 1 displays mild, consistent rightward tilt of the head/neck and subtle posturing of the tremulous LUE. I assigned an additional diagnosis of dystonia largely due to the involvement of the atremulous neck. Cases 2, 4 and 5 display subtle dystonic features of tremulous limbs, not out of proportion to the tremor, consistent with underlying ET (plus). Case 3 displays subtle flexion of one finger in sustention (one position); it would be important to rule out other etiologies (e.g., musculoskeletal) and verify a recurrent pattern to confirm a dystonic component (e.g., through serial evaluation, in the clinical setting). A unifying primary dystonia appears unlikely in any of the cases based on the subtle dystonic versus prominent ET features, despite prolonged symptom duration, and the absence of dystonic features at onset. The cases highlight a common diagnostic challenge.

Expert 5

I assigned diagnoses of ET to each of these cases based on the severity of action tremor (i.e., moderate to severe), features of the action tremor that were typical of ET (e.g., kinetic tremor was greater than postural tremor, preferential distribution of tremor in certain joints of the upper limb [e.g., mainly wrist], regularity of oscillations, presence of a single predominant tremor axis on spirals, presence of intention tremor), longstanding duration of the action tremor (i.e., 30 or more years in each), and supporting information (e.g., presence of family history of tremor). The presence of mild dystonic postures in the limb does not preclude a diagnosis of ET, especially in the setting of longstanding and severe ET. The same rationale is applied to other disorders that are linked with the cerebellum. For example, in numerous forms of spinocerebellar ataxia, dystonic postures and movements are common [22]. Recent studies have posited a role of the cerebellum in dystonia [23]. In case 1, I also assigned diagnoses of dystonia. In that case, there was also cervical dystonia and, at present, it is not clear whether the co-occurrence of cervical dystonia merits a second diagnosis. The Jewish ancestry served to further reinforce this diagnostic choice. To be conservative, I also assigned a diagnosis of dystonia in this case.

Expert 6

As I know this is a study on ET with and without dystonic features, there is an inherent degree of bias in the assessment. It is evident that all patients show varying degrees, mostly very mild, of “dystonic posturing”, primarily involving the digits, especially the 5th digit. However, most of these are relatively mild. Except for patient 2, where a digit is seen more prominently extending out during action, in most of the other cases, extension/flexion or splaying are seen with hands outstretched or/and in wing beating position. Logically I should have given the diagnosis of ET plus dystonia in all the cases. However, being a practical minimalist, I will stick to the ET as the primary diagnosis. All patients are age 73 – 88 years with many decades of postural/action/kinetic hand (and in some plus head) tremor, and all patients report a family history of ET or nonspecific tremor, and with no associated known secondary causes. Taken the history and examination in totality, the clinical diagnosis of ET is appropriate. For patient 5, I would like to do further clinical assessment in view of the presence of prominent jaw tremor and have raised the possibility of PD as well.

Expert 7

We analyzed 5 patients with young onset bilateral action and postural tremor of the upper limb, with in most a family history of ET. Age (>70) and duration of evolution (up to 57 years) were additional factors. For all, my final diagnosis based on duration >3 years, bilateral postural and action tremor, absence of rest tremor, no cerebellar ataxia and no other neurological symptoms, plus family history, was ET.

The “abnormal postures” observed were not task specific, transient, without overflow and did not get worse with action, and do not fit with the current definition of dystonia. These postures are an attempt to stabilize the hand (i) either by either co contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles to fix the joint (especially for the wrist), (ii) by increased contraction of the intrinsic muscles (with flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joints) as there is a clear contribution of the intrinsic muscles to grip and pinch strength, or (iii) by using the 5th finger as a pendulum to maintain a more steady position of the hand. The 5th finger stabilizes the hand during the grip (exclusion of the ulnar two digits resulted in a 34% to 67% decrease in grip strength) [24]. This would be a “physiological orthosis” by analogy to mechanical devices/orthosis for tremor control [25]. Therefore, these “abnormal postures” may be adaptative process in severe tremor. Overall, considering the presence of mild additional abnormal posture associated with the ET features, these patients could qualify for the diagnosis of ET “plus” according to the recent consensus classification.

Summary of expert synopses and further discussion

This manuscript portrays some of the differences between experts in assigning diagnoses of ET or dystonia to individuals with abnormal postures on examination. For the same case, diagnoses ranged from ET (including “ET-plus”) to ET and dystonia (i.e., two diagnoses) to dystonic tremor, that is, a full spectrum of assigned diagnoses. Underlying some of this lack of agreement was a difference among some experts in terms of labeling certain postures as dystonic. Another difference lay in the interpretation of the presence of these postures in an individual who had been assigned a diagnosis of ET. To some experts, a certain severity or level of dystonia on examination was thought to be within the realm of an ET diagnosis and beyond that, a second diagnosis was warranted (i.e., dystonia). To others, the presence of any dystonia on examination was thought to require a revision of the initial ET diagnosis. Given the differences between experts, neurophysiological studies may play a role in assigning diagnoses.

The current manuscript presented five cases, carefully selected to generate discussion. The goal was not to challenge the current Consensus statement or necessarily to build consensus, but rather, to raise issues, highlight areas of uncertainty, and search for areas of common as well as differentiated thought. Several such questions are as follows:

Is the presence of dystonic posture on examination inconsistent with a diagnosis of ET? If the presence of dystonic postures on examination is not inconsistent with a diagnosis of ET, then how much and what type of dystonic postures are allowable within the framework of an ET diagnosis? Is it possible to have two simultaneous diagnoses: ET and dystonia? Are some postures forms of dystonia or mere variations or normal?

Future work is needed to frame questions for future research and attempts at consensus.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif