Available online 24 January 2022, 151549
AbstractBackgroundAdvances in genome sequencing have enabled detailed microbiome analysis; however, the ideal specimen type for sequencing is yet to be determined. Rectal swabs may offer a rapid and convenient modality for colonic microbiome analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of rectal swabs compared to faecal specimens.
Methods and ResultsTwenty health professionals participated in this study and provided a faecal specimen, a self-collected rectal swab and a rectal swab taken by a clinician. DNA was extracted and 16 S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out for microbiome analysis.
Alpha diversity was higher in swabs compared to faecal specimens; however, the difference was only significant when comparing clinician-obtained swabs to faeces.
Analysis of beta diversity consistently showed that few taxa were affected by sample type. We found sample type accounted for only 6.8% of community variation (R2 = 0.067, p<0.001, permanova). Notably, there were only six genera identified in clinician-obtained swabs that were not also found in the self-taken swabs.
ConclusionsBoth self-collected and clinician obtained rectal swabs are a reliable method of analysing the colonic microbiome. Obtaining specimens for microbiome analysis is often time-critical due to therapy, such as antibiotics, influencing the microbiome. Rectal swabs are shown to be a valid and convenient modality for microbiome analysis.
Keywordsmicrobiome
rectal swab
colon
faecal
16S
Availability of data and materialsThe sequencing data is available from the NCBI Sequencing Read Archive as BioProject PRJNA648177. The R dataset and all code used for analysis is available at https://gitlab.com/morganx/purcell2020.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier GmbH.
留言 (0)