The Nuremberg Code (1947). British Medical Journal. 1996; 313: 1448.

Roelcke V, Maio G. Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag; 2004, p.167–80.

Brandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hastings Cent Rep. 1978; 8: 21–9.

Paulsen NA, Lie AK. Research ethics on the agenda – the debates preceding the establishment of ethics committees. Tidsskriftet Den Norske Legeforening 2016: 36: 1739-43.

Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1966; 274 :1354-60.

Pappworth MH. Human Guinea Pigs: Experimentation on Man. London: Routledge; 1967.

Rothman DJ. Strangers at The Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books; 1991.

Wang M, Zhao M. Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. Beijing: People’s Health Press; 2018.

Hennig W. Bioethics in China: although national guidelines are in place, their implementation remains difficult. EMBO Rep. 2006; 7: 850-54.

Anonymous. National Institutes of Health: ClinRegs: China: Oct 28, 2021 [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://clinregs.niaid.nih.gov/country/china#_top

China’s Ethical Review System. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Chinese-Ethics-Review-System.pdf

[13 Codes of the ethics on Biomedical research, Shanghai Municipal Surveillance Bureau]. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: http://yxky.fudan.edu.cn/4f/d3/c6382a85971/page.htm

Dyke T, Anderson W. A history of health and medical research in Australia. Med J Aust. 2014; 201: S33-6.

Leggat PA. A college of tropical medicine for Australasia. Med J Aust. 1992; 157: 222-3.

Cumpston JHL. The Health of the People; A Study in Federalism Canberra. Australia: Roebuck Society; 1978.

Anonymous. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018

Anonymous. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Statement on human experimentation. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: http://esvc000239.bne001tu.server-web.com/Downloads/CRIAH%20Tools%20for%20Collaboration%20ver1%20December2007/4%20Ethics/National%20Statement%20on%20Ethical%20Conduct%20in%20Research%20involving%20Humans.pdf

National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian code of practice for the use of animals for scientific purposes. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-care-and-use-animals-scientific-purposes

Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee, Guidelines for responsible practice in research and problems of research misconduct. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/reports/australian-code-responsible-conduct-research.pdf

National Health and Medical Research Council. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/ethics/national-certification-scheme-ethics-review-multi-centre-research

Olver IN, Fallerio SP, Marson ML, Bishop JF. A case study of a single ethics committee for multicentre trials. Med J Aust. 2011; 195(10): 582-3.

Anonymous. Supporting research and ethics – about us. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://bellberry.com.au/about-us/

Wang ZH, Zhou GH, Li-Ping S, Gang J. Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China. J Int Med Res. 2019, 47: 4636-43.

Ballantyne AJ, Rogers WA. Fair inclusion of men and women in Australian clinical research: views from ethics committee chairs. Med J Aust. 2008; 188(11): 653-6.

McLoughlin F, Hadgraft NT, Atkinson D, Marley JV. Aboriginal health research in the remote Kimberley: an exploration of perceptions, attitudes and concerns of stakeholders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 517.

Zhang J, Zhang ZM, The challenges of ethical review in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021; 2021: 6754985.

Lewis JW, Keightley DN, Young EP, et al. China. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.britannica.com/place/China

Anonymous. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Regional Population 2019-2020. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/regional-population/latest-release

Sabesan S, Malica M, Gebbie C, Scott C, Thomas D, Zalcberg J. Implementation of the Australasian teletrial model: translating idea into action using implementation science frameworks. J Telemed Telecare. 2021; 1357633X211017805.

Zhang X, Zhang W, Zhao Y. The Chinese ethical review system and it compliance mechanisms. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Chinese-Ethics-Review-System.pdf

Liu J, Shen J, Liu P-Z. A survey of five first-level hospital ethics committees in Urumqi, China. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013, 14: 541-8

Fitzgerald MH, Phillips PA. Centralized and non-centralized ethics review: a five-nation study. Account Res. 2006; 13(1): 47-74.

National Health and Medical Research Council. The human research ethics applications; research policy. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/ethics/human-research-ethics-application-hrea

Zhou P, Xue D, Wang T, et al. Survey on the function, structure and operation of hospital ethics committees in Shanghai. J Med Ethics. 2009, 35: 512-6.

Anonymous. National Institutes of Health: ClinRegs: United Kingdom. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://clinregs.niaid.nih.gov/country/united-kingdom

Newson AJ, de Lacey S, Dowling DK, et al. Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens’ jury on mitochondrial donation. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(4): 751-57.

Anonymous. Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs Inc. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.aahrpp.org

Anonymous. Strategic initiative for developing capacity in ethical review. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.who.int/sidcer/en/

Anonymous. National Health and Medical Research Council. Ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research. [cited Dec 2021]; Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/ethical-guidelines-use-assisted-reproductive-technology

Lipworth W, Mason PH, Kerridge I. Ethics and epistemology of big data. J Bioeth Inq. 2017; 14(4): 489-500.

Ienca M, Ferretti A, Hurst S, Puhan M, Lovis C, Vayena E. Considerations for ethics review of big data health research: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10): e0204937.

Courtwright A, Rubin E. Who should decide for the unrepresented? Bioethics. 2016; 30(3): 173-80.

Broadman F, Hale R. Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: a comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018; 6(6):1079-1096.

Olver IN. Ethical issues with xenotransplantation clinical trials. Med J Aust. 2014; 204(6): 212.

Olver IN. Opting in for opt-out consent. Med J Aust. 2014; 200(4): 201-2.