1. Ljungberg, B, Albiges, L, Abu-Ghanem, Y, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: The 2019 update. Eur Urol 2019; 75(5): 799–810.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Rouprêt, M, Babjuk, M, Compérat, E, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol 2018; 73(1): 111–122.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Clayman, RV, Kavoussi, LR, Soper, NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1991; 146(2): 278–282.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Clayman, RV, Kavoussi, LR, Figenshau, RS, et al. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: Initial clinical case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991; 1(6): 343–349.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Gaur, D, Agarwal, D, Purohit, K. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1993; 149(1): 103–105.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Luo, J, Zhou, F, Xie, D, et al. Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. World J Urol 2009; 28(3): 289–293.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Portis, AJ, Yan, Y, Landman, J. Long-term follow up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002; 167(3): 1257–1262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Saika, T, Ono, Y, Hattori, R, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2003; 62(6): 1018–1023.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Hsueh, TY, Huang, Y, Chiu, AW, et al. A comparison of the clinical outcome between open and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2004; 94(6): 798–801.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Bariol, SV, Stewart, GD, McNeill, SA, et al. Oncological control following laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: 7-year outcome. J Urol 2004; 172(5, Pt 1): 1805–1808.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Ono, Y, Kinukawa, T, Hattori, R, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A five-year experience. Urology 1999; 53(2): 280–286.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Dunn, M, Portis, A, Shalhav, A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-year experience. J Urol 2000; 164(4): 1153–1159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Portis, A, Elnady, M, Clayman, R. Laparoscopic radical/total nephrectomy: A decade of progress. J Endourol 2001; 15(4): 345–354; discussion 375.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Kaouk, J, Haber, GP, Goel, R. Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009; 57(4): 723–726.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Fan, X, Lin, T, Xu, K, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2012; 62(4): 601–612.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Wright, J, Porter, J. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Urol 2005; 174(3): 841–845.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Garg, M, Singh, V, Sinha, RJ, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. Urology 2014; 84(2): 335–339.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Nadler, RB, Loeb, S, Clemens, JQ, et al. A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors – is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach. J Urol 2006; 175(4): 1230–1233; discussion 1234.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Gao, Z, Wu, J-T, Liu, Y, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Chin Med J 2007; 120(24): 2314–2316.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Kieran, K, Montgomery, J, Daignault, S, et al. Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol 2007; 21(7): 754–759.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Fan, X, Xu, K, Lin, T, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2013; 111(4): 611–621.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Fu, J, Ye, S, Ye, H-J. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin Med Sci J 2015; 30(4): 239–244.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Ren, T, Liu, Y, Zhao, X, et al. Transperitoneal approach versus retroperitoneal approach: A meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(3): e91978.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Flather, M, Farkouh, M, Pogue, J, et al. Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: Larger studies may be more reliable. Control Clin Trials 1997; 18(6): 568–579; discussion 661.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Liu, W, Wang, Y, Zhong, Z, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A matched-pair comparison based on perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2016; 30(12): 5537–5541.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. https://www.baus.org.uk/professionals/baus_business/data_audit.aspx
Google Scholar27. Dindo, D, Demartines, N, Clavien, PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2): 205–213.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. 2018 BAUS UK workforce report , https://www.baus.org.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/publications/Workforce_Report_Sep%202018%20ver%201.1.pdf
Google Scholar29. Nambirajan, T, Jeschke, S, Al-Zahrani, H, et al. Prospective, randomized controlled study: Transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 2004; 64(5): 919–924.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Desai, MM, Strzempkowski, B, Matin, SF, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2005; 173(1): 38–41.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Negoro, H, Shiraishi, Y, Sugino, Y, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma at Kobe City General Hospital. Hinyokika Kiyo 2005; 51(6): 369–372.
Google Scholar | Medline32. Berdjis, N, Hakenberg, OW, Leike, S, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A single-center experience of 63 cases. Urol Int 2006; 77(2): 166–169.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Deger, S, Wille, A, Roigas, J, et al. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy: Techniques and outcome. Eur Urol Suppl 2007; 6(10): 630–634.
Google Scholar | Crossref34. Okegawa, T, Noda, H, Horie, S, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A single-center experience of 100 cases. Int J Urol 2008; 15(11): 957–960.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Taue, R, Izaki, H, Koizumi, T, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: A comparative study. Int J Urol 2009; 16(3): 263–267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Jung, MH, Tae, HK, Won, YC, et al. Comparison of techniques for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in a single center: Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal vs. hand-assisted. Korean J Urol 2009; 50(7): 675–681.
Google Scholar | Crossref37. Ha, US, Hwang, TK, Kim, YJ, et al. Comparison of oncological outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for the management of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional study. BJU Int 2011; 107(9): 1467–1472.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Xu, ZL, Wang, LH, Chen, W, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: A comparison of clinical outcomes. Acad J Second Mil Med Univ 2011; 31(9): 938–941.
Google Scholar | Crossref39. Kim, H, Lee, D, Yoo, J, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (>7cm) solid renal tumors: Comparison of perioperative outcomes with the transperitoneal approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2017; 27(4): 393–397.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Berglund, R, Gill, I, Babineau, D, et al. A prospective comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in the extremely obese patient. BJU Int 2007; 99(4): 871–874.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Chen, Y, Zheng, H, Liang, G, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for nonfunctional tuberculous kidneys: A single-center experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28(3): 325–329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Winaikosol, K, Phacherat, K, Chotikawanich, E. Laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: Perioperative outcomes at Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95(Suppl. 11): S18–S24.
Google Scholar | Medline43. Benoit, T, Peyronnet, B, Roumiguié, M, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for polycystic kidney: Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. World J Urol 2016; 34(7): 901–906.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline44. Gogoi, D, Pal, D, Bera, M. Systemic immunologic and inflammatory response after transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A prospective observational study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2016; 27(5): 985–991.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline45. Ng, C, Gill, I, Ramani, A, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2005; 174(3): 846–849.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline46. Tugcu, V, Bitkin, A, Sonmezay, E, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2011; 83(4): 175–180.
Google Scholar | Medline47. Gin, G, Maschino, A, Spaliviero, M, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumour complexity. Urology 2014; 84(6): 1355–1360.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline48. Marszalek, M, Chromecki, T, Al-Ali, B, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approach. Urology 2011; 77(1): 109–113.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI49. Kim, T, Suh, Y, Jeon, H, et al. Transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse disease progression than retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 6294.
Google Scholar |