Framework for obstetrics and gynecology department change management in response to COVID-19 pandemic: A tertiary center experience

   Abstract 


Coronavirus (cov) disease 2019 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome cov 2 has imposed significant demands on healthcare systems across the world. These demands were more significant on obstetrics and gynecology (obgyn) patients, who required services that had to continue despite the closure of other services. This paper describes the change management of an obgyn department at a tertiary health-care center. That experience resulted in a complete management shift in the institution and the formation of an infectious disease epidemic plan for respiratory infections. Description of the change management performed, difficulties encountered, and achievements obtained can assist other departments change management when they face similar situations.

Keywords: Change management, coronavirus disease 2019, obstetrics and gynecology


How to cite this article:
Madkhali AM, Al Ghamdi SO, Al-Sum H, Al-Kadri HM, Sinnappan S, Al Ghilan NA, Hamam H, Al-Rabiea'a H, AL-Shamrani SM, Al Saif S, Tashkandi NA, Al-Moamary MS. Framework for obstetrics and gynecology department change management in response to COVID-19 pandemic: A tertiary center experience. Ann Thorac Med 2021;16:57-63
How to cite this URL:
Madkhali AM, Al Ghamdi SO, Al-Sum H, Al-Kadri HM, Sinnappan S, Al Ghilan NA, Hamam H, Al-Rabiea'a H, AL-Shamrani SM, Al Saif S, Tashkandi NA, Al-Moamary MS. Framework for obstetrics and gynecology department change management in response to COVID-19 pandemic: A tertiary center experience. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 5];16:57-63. Available from: 
https://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2021/16/1/57/307052

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COV-2) pandemic has imposed significant demands on healthcare systems around the world. Most hospitals and health-care centers have had to reassign space, personnel and facilities to accommodate the heavy load of sick patients.[1] Restructuring the health-care system in this emerging situation would require a strong need for constant collaboration and major readjustments on a daily basis as the disease was new for all with constantly changing information.[2] These changes were variable for different specialties where elective cases were postponed or rearranged, workforce was redistributed and wards were redesigned in response to the demands of COVID-19 patient management.[3] Such arrangements were not suitable for obstetrics services as they have different challenges. Obstetrics wards and labor rooms and obstetrics emergency services needed to continue to function for their patients. Furthermore, elective cesarean sections (CS) continued as previously planned despite the COVID-19 pandemic challenges; increasing the risk of disease transmission to healthy controls and health-care workers (HCW).[3] The balance between maintaining the needed obstetric care for patient versus safety of HCW and patients was challenging.[4] Pregnant patients with COVID-19 are frequently asymptomatic, and the appropriate management for these patients is unclear. Likewise, it is not well known whether pregnancy imposes additional risk to the mother or her fetus.[5] The lack of reliable data on the management of COVID-19 infection for pregnant patients causes an additional stress for obstetrics HCW.[6]

Understanding obstetric management of COVID-19, as well as hospital-level preparedness for its control, was crucial for patient safety.[7] Guidance for patient management has come from expert opinions, case series, and systematic reviews of observational studies.[7],[8] Saudi as well as international perinatal societies have produced fairly consistent guidelines for the management of these patients based on available data.[9],[10]

Few international obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) departments have described their departmental management in response to COVID-19 with variable aims and results. Some have described the management in countries with fewer resources, others described outpatient and inpatient practices and psychosocial challenges, and summary of practice.[11],[12],[13] There is a scarcity of data on complete experience and change management descriptions that have resulted in successful safe management of obstetrics patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.[14]

The Department of OBGYN at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, is one of the largest OBGYN departments in the region. There are more than 8000 deliveries conducted annually with CS incidence of about 25% that have maternal and fetal outcomes that are comparable to international figures. With the announcement of the pandemic, KAMC was ready with an emergency plan to tackle the pandemic challenges due to the institution's experience with the Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV) outbreak where the institute shut down inpatients activities for 2 months during 2015.[15] In response to the MERS-CoV outbreak, the institute underwent complete change management that resulted in quick control of the outbreak. Based on that experience, a contingency plan was established at KAMC for any similar future outbreaks or emerging pathogens, a plan that set an example for other institutions.[16] The Infectious Disease Epidemic Plan was revised based on the available scientific data, Riyadh's epidemic situation, HCW availability and number of expected COVID-19 cases; aiming for smooth and safe patient flow across the hospital, organized patient admission, space designation and imposed limits on elective admission and surgical cases. The aim is to guarantee enough admission beds, intensive care unit beds, and necessary support facilities while protecting institution HCW and patients and effectively caring for COVID-19 patients.

In this study, we described the change management that has occurred at the Department of OBGYN at KAMC-Riyadh and the implemented change management plan. We believe that the unique experience presented can provide an example for other OBGYN departments that may face similar situations.

   Departmental General Infection Prevention and Control Precautions Top

All the OBGYN department HCWs did the obligatory infection prevention training and the N95 mask fit testing as required by the infection prevention and control (IPC) department. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers were made available in all clinical areas for the use of HCW and patients. A unified screening tool was used for all patients entering the hospital including the emergency department and outpatient facilities using the acute respiratory infection (ARI) checklist (temperature check and symptoms assessment); the assigned team for ARI checking has agreed upon the appropriate pathway to follow.

Visitors were not allowed in the hospital and accompanying personnel were not allowed at outpatient facilities. All HCW and patients were asked to wear a mask during their presence or stay in the clinical facilities. Distance spacing in all waiting areas was arranged, keeping at least one and half meter distance between attending personnel. All surfaces and medical equipment were cleaned and disinfected regularly.

   Outpatient Clinic Top

In the obstetric clinics, the goals of prenatal care remain essential for the prevention, detection, and management of pregnancy complications when they arise. Maintaining daily outpatient maternity services for more than 250 patients at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge. Practicing IPC precautions to control disease transmission among patients and staff required a modified prenatal care approach.

Entrance to the outpatient clinic building was allowed only if appointment confirmation was available. All antenatal educational classes were suspended, and educational leaflets were handed to the patients instead. The waiting areas were expanded through the utilization of appropriate space on the same floor. One waiting area was assigned for each obstetric consultant's patients to ease contact-tracing if confirmed COVID-19 cases were identified.

While high-risk patients were seen regularly and their follow up plans were individualized, a suggested care model following Saudi Society of Maternofetal Medicine guidelines that combined both telehealth and in-person visits for low-risk patients was followed.[10] Confirmed case of COVID-19, infection management was based on the agreed-on international recommendations.[9] Routine appointments for low-risk patients were delayed until after the recommended period of isolation. For COVID-19-positive patients with high-risk pregnancies, management was individualized, and appointments were arranged at the end of the working hours.

Gynecology clinics were run virtually. The consultant and his team had to call all patients with appointments to perform virtual assessment and plan of care. If physical assessment was deemed necessary, physical attendance was arranged. The pharmaceutical department has arranged medications home delivery, drive-through medication pick-up, or personal attendance.

   Obstetric Emergency and Labor and Delivery Units Top

Previous preparedness plans and patient flow pathways for patients with respiratory infection and MERS-CoV infection were reviewed and updated. The updates aimed to fit with admission plans from the obstetric triage, assessment, and management unit (OTAMU) to the labor room, according to the available national and international best practices.

In the OTAMU, all pregnant patients at more than 20 weeks of gestation who came through the main hospital emergency drive-through were directed to the OTAMU entrance.[16] On arrival to the OTAMU, patients were screened using the ARI scoring system, and according to their scores, the managing team followed the approved pathway. The OTAMU was prepared with two high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and staff took full personal protective equipment (PPE) precautions for patients with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. If admission was required, patients were admitted according to the hospital flow chart pathway for inpatients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Admitted patients received a swab test for COVID-19 regardless of their symptoms as per the hospital-wide policy that was initiated in May 2020.

In labor and delivery suite, negative pressure rooms were increased from 2 to 5 rooms to accommodate the increased number of confirmed and suspected cases. HEPA filters were made available if extra negative pressure rooms were needed. PPE was made available in the unit around the clock. Simulations and drills on the management of confirmed COVID-19 cases in labor suite were carried out for all levels of HCW.

Patients with negative ARI screening were assessed and admitted according to the normal pathway. Given that the second stage of labor is an aerosol-producing stage, the managing teams were instructed to wear full PPE (surgical mask, face shield, head cover, gown, gloves, and boots). The N95 mask was not considered a requirement in such cases. If emergency CS was determined necessary, it was performed in the labor and delivery suite with staff taking the full PPE precautions. The N95 mask was required if general anesthesia was needed or anticipated.

Suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases were admitted to the designated isolation negative pressure rooms. A full maternal and fetal assessment was conducted, including assessment of the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and confirmation of the onset and progress of labor, as per the standard care. A multi-disciplinary team approach, including an infectious disease specialist or medical specialist consultation was used.[17] Standard Maternofetal care and observation were practiced during labor. If a patient with suspected COVID-19-infection was found to be positive while in labor, both obstetric and neonatology physicians explain to the patient the test result, expected pathway and possible outcomes. Efforts were made to minimize the number of staff members entering the room, and visitors were not allowed. Anesthesia service was consulted in the event an epidural was needed, and neonatology service was alerted for newborn isolation after delivery.[18]

Vaginal delivery was the goal, while CS was performed depending on fetal or maternal indications. If CS was indicated, it was done at a designated negative pressure operating room (OR). Full PPE precaution was practiced, and CS was done under spinal or epidural analgesia unless general anesthesia was indicated for the case. A post-CS patient recovered in the OR and was transferred directly to an assigned room in the COVID-19 ward, as per the hospital policy. Elective CS cases were evaluated by the patient's consultant to determine the urgency of the procedure and the safety of delaying the procedure until the infection cleared to minimize risk of infection transmission to other patients, HCW, and the newborn.[18],[19]

Newborn, whose mother was confirmed positive for COVID-19, was resuscitated in a separate room from the mother and underwent a whole-body bathing with soap and water when stable. The infant was then placed in an isolation.[20] The admission process for those infants followed the agreed-upon pathway as shown in [Table 1].

Table 1: Neonatal Resuscitation Team Management of Infants born to Confirmed/Unknown/Pending Coronavirus disease 2019 Mothers in Labor and Deliver

Click here to view

Swab testing was required if the infant was born to a mother confirmed positive for COVID-19. HCW were required to take a throat and/or nasopharyngeal swab or tracheal swab if the baby was intubated. First sample was done at 24 h of life and the second sample was obtained after 72 h of life (4th day of life) if the first test was negative. Breastfeeding was not allowed in such cases. Infants were allowed to be discharged with their asymptomatic COVID-19 positive mothers. An Arabic Waiver confirming that the mother has agreed to have her baby discharged with her after counseling is usually taken.

   Inpatient Wards Top

The COVID-19 pandemic presented several challenges in the inpatient area, notably locating an area for admission of suspected and confirmed positive cases and the increasing number of positive obstetric cases in addition to the influx of regular daily cases.

At earlier phases, all confirmed or suspected cases were admitted to dedicated isolation wards under obstetric consultation based on shared care with infectious disease consultants. As the pandemic progressed, bed occupancy by positive cases has increased in medical wards and number of obstetric positive cases has also increased. One of the OBGYN department postpartum wards with 32 beds capacity was converted to an isolation ward for COVID-19-positive obstetrics patients only. All rooms in the assigned postpartum ward were converted into negative pressure rooms. COVID-19-positive OBGYN patients were assessed during the daily rounds. Patients with no concerns were contacted by phone to check on them, answer their queries and give them the plan of care. Physical assessment was done as indicated. This approach decreased unnecessary exposure among staff and preserved the PPE supply. All electively admitted patients were tested for COVID-19 prior to their admission. For emergent and urgent admission, rapid testing was performed, and the patient was considered a suspected/pending case until the result made available.

Due to the low occupancy of gynecology beds during the COVID-19 pandemic, the gynecology ward with 25 beds capacity was utilized for both obstetric and postpartum patients alongside early pregnancy-related admissions. Early discharge within 6–18 h for stable and uncomplicated cases following vaginal delivery was activated and a home health-care team arranged to visit the patient after discharge. A special flow was arranged for positive cases who needed induction and dedicated negative pressure isolation rooms in the antenatal ward adjacent to the labor and delivery suite were assigned to them.

   Home Health Care for Postpartum Patients Top

There is no international standard definition for early postpartum discharge because the average length of stay for vaginal delivery varies between countries.[21] Therefore, the hospitalization period for vaginal delivery in KAMC-Riyadh was brought down from 18 to 24 h to between 6 and 18 h.

Internationally, health-care centers have advocated for shorter postpartum stays for reasons such as containing costs, de-medicalizing childbirth, and promoting family-centered bonding[22] for KAMC, the driving force for promoting shorter postpartum hospital stays was to mitigate the risk of hospital-acquired infection for mother and baby and to ensure bed availability when the pandemic escalates.

A complete remodeling of the discharge process was implemented to hasten the turnover of beds, which inadvertently helped to contain resources and services. Expedited discharge planning was rolled out by the physician soon after delivery at the labor ward for cases that meet the criteria for home health-care visits: Uncomplicated vaginal delivery with negative COVID-19 test. Patients were informed of the early discharge plan.

At the time of writing this paper, the home health-care team has seen approximately 350 patients since it started in early June 2020. All early discharge patients were visited within 24–48 h, with the aim of maximizing maternal health. Postpartum units were prepared by having a written protocol, well-trained personnel and specific checklists to complement and guide home visits. Patients have verbalized commitment in providing care for them self and their infant. Subsequently, no increase in emergency room visits or readmissions were observed a result of the early discharges. This observation will be confirmed by conducting a satisfaction survey and post pandemic audit on the readmission rate for postpartum patients during the pandemic period.

As systematic and well-planned protocol with a structured home visit has proven to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity in developed countries, it would be ideal to continue this program after the pandemic.[23],[24]

   Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Unit Top

Routine and specialized obstetric ultrasound scans (USS) are an important part of prenatal care that needs to be maintained despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.[25] The OBGYN USS unit at KAMC usually runs approximately 1700 antenatal scans per month, with two distinctive working areas: One is in the outpatient clinic and the other is in the inpatient area. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, modifications to the obstetric USS service to minimize risk of exposure for both patients and HCW without jeopardizing Maternofetal outcomes were implemented.

The USS room and machine cleaning techniques were emphasized with the ICP department, using appropriate and special sanitation. Sanitation was done every day at the beginning and end of the day and in between patients. All ultrasound appointments were arranged and booked by phone or mobile phone messages. Obstetric USS appointments were arranged on the same day as the patients' clinic visits to reduce risk of exposure. All gynecology USS orders were reviewed for their urgency, patients were contacted, and USS request was rescheduled where possible.

As the risk of infection is high during USS due to the impossibility of keeping a protective distance,[25] sonographers were instructed to minimally adequate scanning time. Likewise, personnel in attendance were limited. Low-risk obstetric USS requests were limited to fetus dating and viability scans at 11–13 weeks of gestation and anomaly second trimester scans at 18–23 weeks. Physicians were advised to reduce the frequency of obstetric USS requests for high-risk patients to the minimum required.

For patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, USS requests were reviewed and rescheduled for after the clearance of the infection where possible. An experienced sonographer was assigned to perform the scan and was instructed to practice PPE procedure and deeply clean the machine and scanning room after the USS. Where possible, pregnant COVID-19 positive women who were not hospitalized had their USS appointment scheduled for the end of working hours to minimize exposure to other attending patients and staff. For inpatients and Emergency Department USS requests, a portable scan. Was performed at the patient's room to prevent contamination to the ultrasound unit and to minimize exposure to other health workers.[26]

   In vitro Fertilization and Reproductive Endocrinology Unit Top

As the number of COVID-19 cases increased, all ongoing procedures were completed for patients with good response to in vitro fertilization (IVF) medications, and patients were given the choice between fresh embryo transfer and freezing all embryos. The initiation of new treatment cycles was suspended following international guidelines.[27] There was an exception for male oncology patients who were to undergo chemotherapy treatment. In those cases, sperm freezing was done with instruction to collect semen samples at home to avoid using the collection room in the hospital. Strict compliance with protective measures during the procedure was followed. Female oncology patients were treated with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone Analog as a fertility preservation method to avoid frequent clinic visits.[28] Patients booked in IVF clinics were called and reassured through a weekly virtual clinic and provided with access to care for urgent situations. Waiting lists were created for all clinics so that patients could be rescheduled after the COVID-19 situation is resolved to ensure that patients are not lost in the system.

   Residency Training Top

In our center, we are running a 5-year OBGYN program with more than 40 residents at different levels, from junior to senior level. In concordance with postgraduate academic affairs, steps were taken for the continuity of the program to provide maximum benefits for residents while ensuring a safe environment for both resident and patient.

Acceptance of rotating residents and offsite training rotation were suspended. All our academic activities were converted to real-time online activity and arrangement of virtual objective structured clinical evaluation has been done for senior graduating residents. Residents were involved in running the virtual gynecology clinic under the consultant supervision.

As the scheduled surgical gynecological procedures were placed on hold and training rotations in sub-specialties such as IVF, urogynecology, and gyn-oncology were on hold too, residents were mainly doing the cesarian section procedures and emergency gynecological surgeries.

Those residents in their final year who still need to complete their essential rotations will have their graduations delayed until they finish their outstanding rotations.

This pandemic raised the need to come up with innovative virtual surgical skills training methods, which can be used as an alternative to hand-on training for residents during such situations.[29]

   Post Pandemic Suggested Audits Top

Although positive results were observed in response to the quick and dynamic changes implemented [Table 2], there will be a need to audit the outcomes of pregnant ladies who were managed and delivered during the pandemic which may reflect on the efficiency and impact of the implemented changes. Conducting patient satisfaction survey regarding the changes done at the outpatient set up including the virtual clinic implementation is another area to be looked at searching for opportunities for improvement.

Table 2: Summary of main challenges faced during coronavirus disease 2019pandemic and actions taken

Click here to view

   Conclusion Top

Change management of a dynamic department during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic has been challenging and has brought with it major threats. Timely preparedness plans, teamwork and resource sharing with adequate, safe, and wise prioritization have resulted in favorable outcomes and smooth implementation of quickly changed policies and guidelines. The outcomes of these changes are observed to be favorable.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the continuous support for. Dr. Bandar Al-Knawy, Chief Executive Officer, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Dr. Abdulmohsen Al Saawi, Executive Director, Medical Services, Central Region, and Dr. Majed Al Shamrani, Executive Director Infection Prevention and Control Department, Ministry of National Guard.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

   References Top
1.Kasaven LS, Saso S, Barcroft J, Yazbek J, Joash K, Stalder C, et al. Implications for the future of Obstetrics and Gynaecology following the COVID-19 pandemic: A commentary. BJOG 2020;127:1318-23.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Olson HL, Towner D, Hiraoka M, Savala M, Zalud I. Academic clinical learning environment in obstetrics and gynecology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Responses and lessons learned. J Perinat Med 2020;48:1013-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Sharma JB, Sharma E. Obstetrics and COVID-19. J Pak Med Assoc 2020;70 Suppl 3:S104-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Alfieri N, Manodoro S, Marconi AM. COVID-19 does not stop obstetrics: What we need to change to go on safely birthing. The experience of a University Obstetrics and Gynecology Department in Milan. J Perinat Med 2020;48:997-1000.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Oliva M, Hsu K, Alsamarai S, Chavez V, Ferrara L. Clinical improvement of severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a pregnant patient after caesarean delivery. BMJ Case Rep 2020;13:e236290.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Vafaei H, Roozmeh S, Hessami K, Kasraeian M, Asadi N, Faraji A, et al. Obstetrics healthcare providers' mental health and quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic: Multicenter study from eight cities in Iran. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2020;13:563-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Peña JA, Bianco AT, Simpson LL, Bernstein PS, Roman AS, Goffman D, et al. A Survey of labor and delivery practices in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:975-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Klaritsch P, Ciresa-König A, Pristauz-Telsnigg G; board of the OEGGG. COVID-19 during pregnancy and puerperium A review by the Austrian society of Gynaecology and obstetrics (OEGGG). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020;80:813-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Narang K, Ibirogba ER, Elrefaei A, Trad ATA, Theiler R, Nomura R, et al. SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy: A comprehensive summary of current guidelines. J Clin Med 2020;9:1521.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Faden YA, Alghilan NA, Alawami SH, Alsulmi ES, Alsum HA, Katib YA, et al. Saudi society of maternal-fetal medicine guidance on pregnancy and coronavirus disease 2019. Saudi Med J 2020;41:779-90.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Mahajan NN, Pednekar R, Patil SR, Subramanyam AA, Rathi S, Malik S, et al. Preparedness, administrative challenges for establishing obstetric services, and experience of delivering over 400 women at a tertiary care COVID-19 hospital in India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020;151:188-196.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.London V, McLaren R Jr, Stein J, Atallah F, Fisher N, Haberman S, et al. Caring for pregnant patients with COVID-19: Practical tips getting from policy to practice. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:850-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Qi H, Chen M, Luo X, Liu X, Shi Y, Liu T, et al. Management of a delivery suite during the COVID-19 epidemic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;250:250-2.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.Ghanchi A. Adaptation of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) protocols to a Parisian maternity unit during the 2020 pandemic: A managerial perspective. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2020:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Balkhy HH, Alenazi TH, Alshamrani MM, Baffoe-Bonnie H, Arabi Y, Hijazi R, et al. Description of a hospital outbreak of middle east respiratory syndrome in a large tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1147-55.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Al Knawy BA, Al-Kadri HM, Elbarbary M, Arabi Y, Balkhy HH, Clark A. Perceptions of postoutbreak management by management and healthcare workers of a Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak in a tertiary care hospital: A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e017476.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: responding to a rapidly evolving situation. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:999-1002.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Morau E, Bouvet L, Keita H, Vial F, Bonnet MP, Bonnin M, et al. Anaesthesia and intensive care in obstetrics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020;39:345-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Dubey P, Reddy SY, Manuel S, Dwivedi AK. Maternal and neonatal characteristics and outcomes among COVID-19 infected women: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;252:490-501.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Lavizzari A, Klingenberg C, Profit J, Zupancic JA, Davis AS, Mosca F, et al. International comparison of guidelines for managing neonates at the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Pediatr Res 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0976-5. Online ahead of print.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Smith-Hanrahan C, Deblois D. Postpartum early discharge: Impact on maternal fatigue and functional ability. Clin Nurs Res 1995;4:50-66.  Back to cited text no. 21
    22.Dana SN, Wambach KA. Patient satisfaction with an early discharge home visit program. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003;32:190-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    23.Hashikawa M, Gold KJ. Disaster Preparedness in Primary Care: Ready or Not? Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2018;12:644-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Al-Hazmi AM, Al-Kurashi NY. Health care professionals' knowledge on home health care in Al-khobar and Al-dammam. J Family Community Med 2005;12:115-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Abu-Rustum RS, Akolekar R, Sotiriadis A, Salomon JL, Costa FD, Wu Q, et al. ISUOG consensus statement on organization of routine and specialist obstetric ultrasound services in context of COVID-19. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol 2020;55:863-70.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Abramowicz SJ, Basseal JM, Brezinka C, Dall'Asta A, Deng J, Harrison G, et al. ISUOG safety committee position statement on use of personal protective equipment and hazard mitigation in relation to SARS-CoV-2 for practitioners undertaking obstetric and gynecological ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol 2020;55:886-91.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.ASRM. ASRM Issues New Guidance on Fertility Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Calls for Suspension of Most Treatments American Society for Reproductive Medicine; 2020. Available from: https://www.asrm.org/news-and-publications/news-and-research/press-releases-and-bulletins/asrm-issues-new-guidance-on- fertility-care-during -covid-19-pandemiccalls -for-suspension-of-most-treatments/. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 27].  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.Dellino M, Minoia C, Paradiso AV, De Palo R, Silvestris E. Fertility preservation in cancer patients during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Front Oncol 2020;10:1009.  Back to cited text no. 28
    29.Gudu W, Wondafrash M, Bekele D, Nigatu B, Birrara M, Feyessa MD. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on obstetrics and gynecology residency programs and perspectives on adaptive ways of training in Ethiopia. Research Square; 2020. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-35772/v1.  Back to cited text no. 29
    

 
 


  [Table 1], [Table 2]

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif