Purpose

To better understand opportunities and barriers to implementation and adoption, this mixed-methods study qualitatively examined attitudes toward telecardiology services among veterans who use in-person (IP) outpatient cardiology service versus those using telecardiology (TC) outpatient services.

Methods

Free-text responses were collected from N = 179 veterans enrolled in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) IP or TC services in 3 rural-serving, outpatient telehealth clinics and 1 large, metropolitan outpatient center. Mixed-method analyses of responses included thematic analysis, followed by comparison of code categories and themes between IP and TC groups.

Findings

Fifteen thematic coding categories were identified, which comprised 4 valence categories (favorable or unfavorable attitudes toward TC and IP), as well as themes pertaining to obstacles and opportunities for TC implementation. Overall, veterans enrolled in TC held more favorable attitudes toward TC than those enrolled in IP. Veteran responses included structural concerns (eg, time demands, access, and travel), as well as humanistic qualities (rapport, competence, and face-to-face contact). Differences were observed between the responses of veterans who reported dwelling in urban, suburban, and rural communities, with rural-identifying veterans generally holding more favorable attitudes toward TC than suburban-identifying veterans.

Conclusions

TC users had overwhelmingly positive perceptions of TC. Conversely, unfavorable attitudes from IP patients toward TC did not appear to be borne out in the responses of TC users. On the contrary, TC users’ responses may indicate opportunities for allaying the concerns of TC-naïve veterans. This suggests promise for developing tailored education to dispel barriers for TC service implementation.