Candidates for fundamental physical laws rarely, if ever, employ higher than second time derivatives. Easwaran ([2014]) sketches an enticing story that purports to explain away this puzzling fact and thereby provides indirect evidence for a particular set of metaphysical theses used in the explanation. I object to both the scope and coherence of Easwaran’s account, before going on to defend an alternative, more metaphysically deflationary explanation: in interacting Lagrangian field theories, it is either impossible or very hard to incorporate higher than second time derivatives without rendering the vacuum state unstable. The so-called Ostrogradski instability represents a powerful constraint on the construction of new field theories and supplies a novel, largely overlooked example of non-causal explanation in physics.
1. Introduction: Why Does F = ma?
2. Easwaran's Metaphysical Explanation
3. The Ostrogradksi Theorem
4. A Physical Explanation
5. Laws, Meta-laws, and Non-causal Explanation
留言 (0)