1. Epstein, JI, Egevad, L, Amin, MB, et al. The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: 244–252.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Roehl, KA, Antenor, JA, Catalona, WJ. Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urology 2002; 167: 2435–2439.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Barocas, DA, Alvarez, J, Resnick, MJ, et al. Association between radiation therapy, surgery, or observation for localized prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes after 3 years. Jama 2017; 317: 1126–1140.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Porpiglia, F, Manfredi, M, Mele, F, et al. Diagnostic pathway with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus standard pathway: results from a randomized prospective study in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2017; 72: 282–288.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Ahmed, HU, El-Shater Bosaily, A, Brown, LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS). A Paired Validating Confi Rmatory Study 2017; 389.
Google Scholar6. Kasivisvanathan, V, Rannikko, AS, Borghi, M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. New Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1767–1777.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Rouvière, O, Puech, P, Renard-Penna, R, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 0.
Google Scholar8. Jambor, I, Boström, PJ, Taimen, P, et al. Novel biparametric MRI and targeted biopsy improves risk stratification in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial). J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46: 1089–1095.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Boesen, L, Nørgaard, N, Løgager, V, et al. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e180219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Boesen, L, Nørgaard, N, Løgager, V, et al. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling Out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naïve Men. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 2(3): 311–319.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar12. Grönberg, H, Eklund, M, Picker, W, et al. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol 2018; 74: 722–728.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Cereser, L, Giannarini, G, Bonato, F, et al. Comparison of multiple abbreviated multiparametric MRI-derived protocols for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020.
Google Scholar | Medline14. Jambor, I, Merisaari, H, Aronen, HJ, et al. Optimization of b-value distribution for biexponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39: 1213–1222.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Merisaari, H, Jambor, I. Optimization of b-value distribution for four mathematical models of prostate cancer diffusion-weighted imaging using b values up to 2000 s/mm2: Simulation and repeatability study. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 1954–1969.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Jambor, I, Merisaari, H, Taimen, P, et al. Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 1988–1998.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI17. Toivonen, J, Merisaari, H, Pesola, M, et al. Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm2: Correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis. Magn Reson Med 2015; 74: 1116–1124.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Knaapila, J, Jambor, I, Ettala, O, et al. Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies. Eur Urol Focus 2020: 1–10.
Google Scholar | Medline19. Rosenkrantz, AB, Kopec, M, Kong, X, et al. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 1387–1394.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Choi, MH, Jung, SE, Park, YH, et al. Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer after biopsy: little impact of hemorrhage on tumor staging. Invest Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 21: 3139. DOI: 10.13104/imri.2017.21.3.139.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Sarradin, M, Lepiney, C, Celhay, O, et al. Évaluation prospective du délai minimum de réalisation de l'IRM prostatique après une biopsie de prostate: facteurs prédictifs cliniques et anatomopathologiques de remaniements hémorragiques. Progrès en Urologie 2018; 28: 85–93.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar23. Bourne, R, Panagiotaki, E. Limitations and prospects for diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. Diagnostics 2016; 6: 21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Salvaggio, G, Calamia, M, Purpura, P, et al. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = Ital J Urol Nephrol 2019; 71: 154–160.
Google Scholar | Medline25. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar26. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar27. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar28. Khoo, CC, Eldred-Evans, D, Jaenicke, J, et al. Likert vs. PI-RADS v2: a comparison of two radiological scoring systems for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Supplements 2019; 18: e1865–e1866.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Abreu-Gomez, J, Wu, M, McInnes, MDF, et al. Shape analysis of peripheral zone observations on prostate DWI: correlation to histopathology outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Am J Roentgenology 2020; 214: 1239–1247.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Bass, EJ, Pantovic, A, Connor, M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020.
Google Scholar | Medline31. Giganti, F, Allen, C, Emberton, M, et al. Prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3: 615–619.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline