How to read biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer: Pictorial review for beginners with public access to imaging, clinical and histopathological database

1. Epstein, JI, Egevad, L, Amin, MB, et al. The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: 244–252.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Roehl, KA, Antenor, JA, Catalona, WJ. Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urology 2002; 167: 2435–2439.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Barocas, DA, Alvarez, J, Resnick, MJ, et al. Association between radiation therapy, surgery, or observation for localized prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes after 3 years. Jama 2017; 317: 1126–1140.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Porpiglia, F, Manfredi, M, Mele, F, et al. Diagnostic pathway with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus standard pathway: results from a randomized prospective study in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2017; 72: 282–288.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Ahmed, HU, El-Shater Bosaily, A, Brown, LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS). A Paired Validating Confi Rmatory Study 2017; 389.
Google Scholar6. Kasivisvanathan, V, Rannikko, AS, Borghi, M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. New Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1767–1777.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Rouvière, O, Puech, P, Renard-Penna, R, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 0.
Google Scholar8. Jambor, I, Boström, PJ, Taimen, P, et al. Novel biparametric MRI and targeted biopsy improves risk stratification in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial). J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46: 1089–1095.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Boesen, L, Nørgaard, N, Løgager, V, et al. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e180219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Boesen, L, Nørgaard, N, Løgager, V, et al. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling Out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naïve Men. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 2(3): 311–319.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar12. Grönberg, H, Eklund, M, Picker, W, et al. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol 2018; 74: 722–728.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Cereser, L, Giannarini, G, Bonato, F, et al. Comparison of multiple abbreviated multiparametric MRI-derived protocols for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020.
Google Scholar | Medline14. Jambor, I, Merisaari, H, Aronen, HJ, et al. Optimization of b-value distribution for biexponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39: 1213–1222.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Merisaari, H, Jambor, I. Optimization of b-value distribution for four mathematical models of prostate cancer diffusion-weighted imaging using b values up to 2000 s/mm2: Simulation and repeatability study. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 1954–1969.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Jambor, I, Merisaari, H, Taimen, P, et al. Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 1988–1998.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI17. Toivonen, J, Merisaari, H, Pesola, M, et al. Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm2: Correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis. Magn Reson Med 2015; 74: 1116–1124.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Knaapila, J, Jambor, I, Ettala, O, et al. Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies. Eur Urol Focus 2020: 1–10.
Google Scholar | Medline19. Rosenkrantz, AB, Kopec, M, Kong, X, et al. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 1387–1394.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Choi, MH, Jung, SE, Park, YH, et al. Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer after biopsy: little impact of hemorrhage on tumor staging. Invest Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 21: 3139. DOI: 10.13104/imri.2017.21.3.139.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Sarradin, M, Lepiney, C, Celhay, O, et al. Évaluation prospective du délai minimum de réalisation de l'IRM prostatique après une biopsie de prostate: facteurs prédictifs cliniques et anatomopathologiques de remaniements hémorragiques. Progrès en Urologie 2018; 28: 85–93.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar23. Bourne, R, Panagiotaki, E. Limitations and prospects for diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. Diagnostics 2016; 6: 21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Salvaggio, G, Calamia, M, Purpura, P, et al. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = Ital J Urol Nephrol 2019; 71: 154–160.
Google Scholar | Medline25. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar26. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar27. Blinded for Anonymity .
Google Scholar28. Khoo, CC, Eldred-Evans, D, Jaenicke, J, et al. Likert vs. PI-RADS v2: a comparison of two radiological scoring systems for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Supplements 2019; 18: e1865–e1866.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Abreu-Gomez, J, Wu, M, McInnes, MDF, et al. Shape analysis of peripheral zone observations on prostate DWI: correlation to histopathology outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Am J Roentgenology 2020; 214: 1239–1247.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Bass, EJ, Pantovic, A, Connor, M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020.
Google Scholar | Medline31. Giganti, F, Allen, C, Emberton, M, et al. Prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3: 615–619.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif