Impact of surgical drain output monitoring on patient outcomes in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: A systematic review

1. Robinson, JO : Surgical drainage: An historical perspective. Br J Surg 1986;73(6):422–426.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Durai, R, Mownah, A, Philip, CHN: Use of drains in surgery: A review. J Perioper Pract 2009;9(6):180–186.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals3. Dougherty, SH, Simmons, RL: The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg 1992;29(8):559–623.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Veillette, G, Dominguez, I, Ferrone, C, et al: Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch Surg 2008;143(5):476–481.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Lyons, N, Heron, P, Bethune, R: Improving the recording of surgical drain output. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2015;4(1):u209264.w3964.
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Alkire, BC, Raykar, NP, Shrime, MG, et al: Global access to surgical care: A modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 2015;3(6):e316–e323.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Mujagic, E, Zeindler, J, Coslovsky, M, et al: The association of surgical drains with surgical site infections: A prospective observational study. Am J Surg 2019;217(1):17–23.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Ljungqvist, O, Scott, M, Fearon, KC: Enhanced recovery after surgery: A review. JAMA Surg 2017;152(3):292–298.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Petrowsky, H, Demartines, N, Rousson, V, et al: Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 2004;240(6):1074–1084; discussion 84–85.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Turrentine, FE, Denlinger, CE, Simpson, VB, et al: Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220(2):195–206.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Shea, BJ, Reeves, BC, Wells, G, et al: AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017;358:j4008.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, et al: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI13. Campbell, M, Katikireddi, SV, Sowden, A, et al: Improving Conduct and Reporting of Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Data (ICONS-Quant): Protocol for a mixed methods study to develop a reporting guideline. BMJ Open 2018;8(2):e020064.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Villafane-Ferriol, N, Shah, RM, Mohammed, S, et al: Evidence-based management of drains following pancreatic resection: A systematic review. Pancreas 2018;47(1):12–17.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Davidson, TB, Yaghoobi, M, Davidson, BR, et al: Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD012009.
Google Scholar16. Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, et al: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Ven Fong, Z, Correa-Gallego, C, Ferrone, CR, et al: Early drain removal—The middle ground between the drain versus no drain debate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective validation study. Ann Surg 2015;262(2):378–383.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Kosaka, H, Satoi, S, Yamamoto, T, et al: Clinical impact of the sequentially-checked drain removal criteria on postoperative outcomes after pancreatectomy: A retrospective study. J Hepato-biliary Pancreat Sci 2019;26(9):426–434.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Bassi, C, Molinari, E, Malleo, G, et al: Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252(2):207–214.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Kong, J, Gananadha, S, Hugh, TJ, et al: Pancreatoduodenectomy: Role of drain fluid analysis in the management of pancreatic fistula. ANZ J Surg 2008;78(4):240–244.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. El Nakeeb, A, Salah, T, Sultan, A, et al: Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 2013;37(6):1405–1418.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Facy, O, Chalumeau, C, Poussier, M, et al: Diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 2012;99(8):1072–1075.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Adachi, T, Kuroki, T, Kitasato, A, et al: Safety and efficacy of early drain removal and triple-drug therapy to prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 2015;15(4):411–416.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. McMillan, MT, Malleo, G, Bassi, C, et al: Multicenter, prospective trial of selective drain management for pancreatoduodenectomy using risk stratification. Ann Surg 2017;265(6):1209–1218.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Ansorge, C, Nordin, JZ, Lundell, L, et al: Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014;101(2):100–108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Ceroni, M, Galindo, J, Guerra, JF, et al: Amylase level in drains after pancreatoduodenectomy as a predictor of clinically significant pancreatic fistula. Pancreas 2014;43(3):462–464.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Israel, JS, Rettammel, RJ, Leverson, GE, et al: Does postoperative drain amylase predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy? J Am Coll Surg 2014;218(5):978–987.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Inoue, Y, Imai, Y, Kawaguchi, N, et al: Management of abdominal drainage after hepatic resection. Dig Surg 2017;34(5):400–410.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Yamazaki, S, Takayama, T, Moriguchi, M, et al: Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg 2012;99(11):1584–1590.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Pedrazzoli, S : Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): A systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine 2017;96(19):e6858.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Tang, H, Lu, W, Yang, Z, et al: Risk factors and long-term outcome for postoperative intra-abdominal infection after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine 2017;96(17):e6795.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Jiang, B, Ho, VP, Ginsberg, J, et al: Decision analysis supports the use of drain amylase-based enhanced recovery method after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2018;31(10):doy041.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Sagar, PM, Couse, N, Kerin, M, et al: Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1993;80(6):769–771.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Sagar, PM, Hartley, MN, Macfie, J, et al: Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38(3):254–258.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Hoffmann, J, Shokouh-Amiri, MH, Damm, P, et al: A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30(6):449–452.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Pai, D, Sharma, A, Kanungo, R, et al: Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: A prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69(3):210–213.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. van Duren, BH, van Boxel, GI: A novel method for electronic measurement and recording of surgical drain output. J Med Eng Technol 2017;41(3):179–185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif