1. Willis, E, Semple, AC, de Waal, H. Quantifying the benefits of peer support for people with dementia: a social return on investment (SROI) study. Dementia 2018; 17: 266–278.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI2. Chien, LY, Chu, H, Guo, JL, et al. Caregiver support groups in patients with dementia: a meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26: 1089–1098.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Perkins, D, Fuller, J, Kelly, BJ, et al. Factors associated with reported service use for mental health problems by residents of rural and remote communities: cross-sectional findings from a baseline survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 157.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Banbury, A, Nancarrow, S, Dart, J, et al. Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e8090.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Banbury, A, Parkinson, L, Nancarrow, S, et al. Multi-site videoconferencing for home-based education of older people with chronic conditions: the telehealth literacy project. J Telemed Telecare 2014; 20: 353–359.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI6. Banbury, A, Parkinson, L, Nancarrow, S, et al. Delivering patient education by group videoconferencing into the home: lessons learnt from the telehealth literacy project. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22: 483–488.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI7. Banbury, A, Nancarrow, S, Dart, J, et al. Adding value to remote monitoring: co-design of a health literacy intervention for older people with chronic disease delivered by telehealth-The telehealth literacy project. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103: 597–606.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. O’Connell, ME, Crossley, M, et al. Development and evaluation of a telehealth videoconferenced support group for rural spouses of individuals diagnosed with atypical early-onset dementias. Dementia 2014; 13: 382–395.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI9. Czaja, SJ, Loewenstein, D, Schulz, R, et al. A videophone psychosocial intervention for dementia caregivers. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013; 21: 1071–1081.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI10. Marziali, E, Garcia, LJ. Dementia caregivers’ responses to 2 internet-based intervention programs. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Dementias 2011; 26: 36–43.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI11. Austrom, MG, Geros, KN, Hemmerlein, K, et al. Use of a multiparty web based videoconference support group for family caregivers: innovative practice. Dementia. 2015; 14: 682–690.
Google Scholar12. Dawada P and Knight A. Experience based co-design - a toolkit for Australia. Canberra. Prestantia Health; 2018.
Google Scholar13. Szebeko, D, Tan, L. Co-designing for society. AMJ 2010; 3: 580.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Tan, L, Szebeko, D. Co-designing for dementia: the Alzheimer 100 project. AMJ 2009; (12): 185.
Google Scholar15. Clemensen, J, Rothmann, MJ, Smith, AC. Participatory design methods in telemedicine research. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 23: 780–785.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI16. Robert, G, Cornwell, J, Locock, L, et al. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. Br Med J 2015; 10: 350.
Google Scholar17. Donetto, S, Tsianakas, V, Robert, G. Using experience-based Co-design (EBCD) to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. London: King’s College; 2014
Google Scholar18. Swarbrick, CM, Doors, O, Group SDW, EDUCATE, et al. Visioning change: co-producing a model of involvement and engagement in research (innovative practice). Dementia 2019; 18: 3165–3172.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI19. Goeman, D, King, J, Koch, S. Development of a model of dementia support and pathway for culturally and linguistically diverse communities using co-creation and participatory action research. Br Med J 2016; 6: e013064.
Google Scholar20. Banbury, A, Parkinson, L, Gordon, S, et al. Implementing a peer-support programme by group videoconferencing for isolated carers of people with dementia. J Telemed Telecare 2019; 25: 572–577.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI21. Design Council . Design methods for developing services, keeping connected business challenge. London: Design Council; 2015
Google Scholar22. Design Council . The ‘double diamond’design process model. London: Design Council; 2005.
Google Scholar23. Zoom Video Communications Inc . Zoom; 2019. (Accessed July 2021) [Available from: https://zoom.us/].
Google Scholar24. Charmaz, K . Constructing grounded theory: London: Sage; 2014.
Google Scholar25. QSR International . NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software: QSR International Pty Ltd; 1999. (Acccessed July 2021) [Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home].
Google Scholar26. Ubiquity . An interview with Michael schrage. Ubiquity. 2008. (Accessed July 2021) [Available from: https://ubiquity.acm.org/issue.cfm?volume=2008&iss].
Google Scholar27. Roper, C, Grey, F, Cadogan, E. Co-production: putting principles into practice in mental health contexts. Melbourne; 2018. (Accessed July 2021) [https://healthsciences.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/3392215/Coproduction_putting-principles-into-practice.pdf]
Google Scholar28. Byrne, L, Stratford, A, Davidson, L. The global need for lived experience leadership. Psychiatr Rehab J 2018; 41: 76.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Daniels, AS, Bergeson, S, Myrick, KJ. Defining peer roles and status among community health workers and peer support specialists in integrated systems of care. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68: 1296–1298.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Byrne, L, Roennfeldt, H, O’Shea, P, et al. Taking a gamble for high rewards? Management perspectives on the value of mental health peer workers. Int J Env Res Public Health 2018; 15: 746.
Google Scholar | Crossref31. Mead, S, MacNeil, C. Peer support: what makes it unique. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil 2006; 10: 29–37.
Google Scholar