CXCR4 is a valuable poor prognostic marker for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: its higher level of expression is associated with inferior response to therapy and lower disease-free survival


 Table of Contents   ORIGINAL ARTICLE Year : 2021  |  Volume : 46  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 99-104

CXCR4 is a valuable poor prognostic marker for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: its higher level of expression is associated with inferior response to therapy and lower disease-free survival

Inas Asfour1, Walaa A Elsalakawy1, Mohamed T.H Sallam2, Mostafa K.El Razzaz MD 1
1 Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Submission22-Jan-2021Date of Acceptance26-Jan-2021Date of Web Publication29-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Mostafa K.El Razzaz
Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbassyia, Cairo 11566
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/ejh.ejh_3_21

Rights and Permissions


Background Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the common chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (lymphoid neoplasms). It is characterized by a progressive accumulation of functionally incompetent lymphocytes, which are usually monoclonal in origin. CLL is a heterogeneous disease; thus, in some cases, the disease progresses so slowly that treatment is not required, but in others, a more aggressive form of the disease develops. CXCR4 (CD184) is a chemokine and chemokine receptor pair playing critical roles in tumor genesis. It is overexpressed in many hematological malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and generally correlates with a poor prognosis.
Aim To evaluate the clinical utility of CXCR4 expression in patients with CLL as a possible predictor of disease outcome.
Patients and methods This is a prospective study conducted on 33 adult patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Expression of CXCR4 was determined by flow cytometry on either peripheral blood or bone marrow samples. Correlation with the course of the disease and the known CLL prognostic parameters was done initially and after 6 months of follow-up.
Results CXCR4 expression was positively correlated with absolute lymphocytic count, Rai score, β2 microglobulin, and lactate dehydrogenase levels. It was negatively correlated with hemoglobin and platelet counts, overall response rate, and 6-month disease-free survival.
Conclusion We conclude that CXCR4 is a valuable poor prognostic marker for CLL. Its higher level of expression is associated with inferior response to therapy and lower disease-free survival.

Keywords: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CXCR4, survival


How to cite this article:
Asfour I, Elsalakawy WA, Sallam MT, Razzaz MK. CXCR4 is a valuable poor prognostic marker for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: its higher level of expression is associated with inferior response to therapy and lower disease-free survival. Egypt J Haematol 2021;46:99-104
How to cite this URL:
Asfour I, Elsalakawy WA, Sallam MT, Razzaz MK. CXCR4 is a valuable poor prognostic marker for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: its higher level of expression is associated with inferior response to therapy and lower disease-free survival. Egypt J Haematol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 30];46:99-104. Available from: http://www.ehj.eg.net/text.asp?2021/46/2/99/329506   Introduction Top

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (lymphoid neoplasms). It is characterized by a progressive accumulation of functionally incompetent lymphocytes, which are usually monoclonal in origin. CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma is the most prevalent leukemia in older adults in the Western hemisphere, with an estimated 19 000 new cases diagnosed per year in the United States [1]. The disease typically affects older people and is rare in those aged less than 50 years [2]. CLL is characterized by the clonal proliferation and accumulation of mature, typically CD5-positive B cells within the blood, bone marrow (BM), lymph nodes, and spleen [3]. These B cells present a weak proliferation index compared with normal B cells and a defect in apoptosis [4]. However, these cells rapidly undergo spontaneous apoptosis when they are cultured in vitro, suggesting that in vivo factors contribute to their prolonged survival and reinforcing the importance of the microenvironment in this context [5]. There are two systems used for CLL clinical staging. These are Binet staging system and the Rai staging systems [6],[7].

CXCR4 (CD184) is a chemokine and chemokine receptor pair, playing critical roles in tumorigenesis. It is overexpressed in many hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and generally correlates with a poor prognosis [6].

CXCR4 has been shown to be crucial for homing, development, and function of B cells. The receptor is highly expressed by B cells throughout their development, and mice deficient in CXCR4 (or CXCL12) lack B lymphopoiesis [8],[9].

  Patients and methods Top

Patient selection

This study included 33 newly diagnosed adult patients with CLL. The diagnosis of CLL was based on the WHO classification of tumors of lymphoid tissues.

CXCR4 expression was measured by flow cytometry. The level of CXCR4 expression has been correlated with the known CLL prognostic parameters and with the course of the disease and the outcome after 6 months of follow-up.

All procedures performed in our study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, and with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration as revised in 1983. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Flow cytometry methodology

Sampling

Blood was collected from each patient aseptically by withdrawing venous blood by a single puncture technique of the antecubital vein. Samples were dispensed gently into ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid dipotassium salt (K2-EDTA)-containing vacutainer tubes (final concentration of 1.5 mg/ml) to perform CXCR4 by flow cytometry.Approximately 3–4 ml BM aspirate was obtained and divided as follows:Half to 1 ml of BM aspirate was obtained; smears were prepared and stained with Leishman and MPO stains for morphological and cytochemical examination.Three milliliters of BM aspirate was obtained on K2-EDTA for IPT and PCR.Samples were sent to each laboratory respectively on the same day of collection.

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping

In the current study, we performed flow cytometric analysis of CXCR4 expression on B lymphocytes (supplied by Beckman Coulter, Hialeah, Florida, USA).

BM or peripheral blood samples were processed on the same day of sample collection. Counting was done using Coulter LH750 cell counter (Beckman Coulter) and the total leucocytic count (TLC) was adjusted to be around 5.0×109/l using phosphate buffered saline 120 Mm NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM phosphate buffer, PH 7.4 (commercially available from Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA). Overall, 50 μl of adjusted samples was aliquoted in each of the sample tubes and then 5 μl of each monoclonal antibody was added.

After incubation for 15 min at room temperature protected from light, 1–2 ml of ammonium chloride-based erythrocyte-lysing solution was added to every tube [8.29 g (0.15) NH4Cl, 1 g (10 mM) KHCO3, 0.037 g (0.1 mM) EDTA, and 1 l distilled water, adjusted to PH 7.3]. Tubes were vortexed then analyzed using Coulter Navios flow cytometer.

Definition of response to treatment

Response assessment was defined according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) criteria [10].

Statistical methods

Data were coded and entered using the statistical package SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA), version 22. Data were summarized using mean and SD for quantitative data and using frequency (count) and relative frequency (percentage) for categorical data.

Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney tests and for categorical data using the χ2 test. Correlations between quantitative variables were done using Spearman correlation coefficient. P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

  Results Top

The current study included 33 newly diagnosed adult CLL patients. The mean age of patients was 53.79 years (range, 42–80 years). Twenty-one patients were males (63.6%) and 12 were females (36.4%).

On examination, five (15.2%) patients had lymphadenopathy, six (18.2%) patients had hepatosplenomegaly, and 19 (57.6%) patients had positive B symptoms.

According to the revised Rai score, 22% of our studied patients were low risk, 27% were intermediate risk, and 51% were high risk. The mean TLC was 58.13×109/l (range, 16.5–219×109/l), and mean absolute lymphocyte count was 61.18×109/l (range, 8.25–154.84×109/l). The mean hemoglobin level was 10.65 g/dl (range, 6–15.5 g/dl), and mean platelet count was 177.4×109/l (range, 16–329×109/l).

The mean CXCR4 expression was 58.57% (range=10.1–93%). The cutoff value for CXCR4 positivity was 20%, where 32 patients out of the 33 were positive and one patient only was negative. CXCR4 expression was not influenced by age or sex of the patients. The mean β2 microglobulin was 2.46 mg/l (range, 1–4.1 mg/l), with 54.5% of the patients with levels less than 3.5 mg/l and 45.5% with levels more than or equal to 3.5 mg/l. The mean lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was 1043.76 IU/l (range, 346–1890 IU/l).

The initial level of CXCR4 expression was significantly positively correlated with TLC, absolute lymphocytic count, LDH, β2 microglobulin, percentage of BM lymphocytes, and both Rai stage and revised Rai score, and negatively correlated with both hemoglobin and platelet count ([Table 1] and [Figure 1]).

The level of CXCR4 expression was highly correlated with B symptoms ([Table 2] and [Figure 2]).

With respect to response, patients included in the present study experienced progressive disease (PD) in 13 (39.3%) cases, complete response (CR) in two (6.06%) cases, partial response (PR) in 10 (30.03%) cases, and no response in eight (24.24%) cases. The mean CD184 expression was lowest in the CR group, and highest in the PD group, denoting the inverse relation between CXCR4 (CD184) expression and response to treatment ([Table 3]).

Table 3 Correlation between initial CXCR4 level and response to treatment

Click here to view

The level of CXCR4 expression at 6 months of follow-up was significantly correlated with TLC, absolute lymphocytic count, hemoglobin, platelet, LDH, and β2 microglobulin ([Table 4]).

Table 4 Correlation between CXCR4 level at 6 months and different variables

Click here to view

As for the cytogenetic studies, CLL panel was done by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in only 15 patients; this panel included 11q−, +12, 13q−, and 17p−. At diagnosis, 80% of those patients had normal cytogenetic parameters (CLL panel by FISH was normal), whereas only 20% of patients had abnormal cytogenetic in the form of 11q−, +12, 13q−, and 17p− by FISH technique. CD38 was positive in three (37.5%) of eight studied patients. ZAP70 was positive in two (28.6%) of seven studied patients, and the remaining five (71.4%) were negative. Regarding Coombs test, five (29.4%) of 17 patients were positive, and the remaining 12 (70.6%) were negative ([Table 5]).

  Discussion Top

CLL is the leading malignant B cell tumor in the western world. The disease is characterized by its heterogeneous pathological nature, indolent natural history, and variable clinical outcomes [11],[12].

A crucial process in the CLL pathogenesis is CLL cells homing in the BM microenvironment. It is thought that many molecular pathways are recruited in this process [13].

Mesenchymal stromal cells, nurse-like cells, and lymphoma-associated macrophages, together with T cells, natural killer cells, and extracellular matrix components, share in the dialog with the neoplastic B cells. B-cell receptor signaling, activation via TNF family members (i.e., BAFF, APRIL), and tissue homing chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules are important in the interaction between malignant B cells and their microenvironment [14].

CXCR4 is a chemokine and chemokine receptor pair, playing crucial roles in tumor genesis. Overexpression of CXCR4 is characteristic of many hematological malignancies, including AML and NHL, and generally correlates with a poor prognosis [6].

So, the present study aimed to determine clinical utility of CXCR4 in patients with CLL in predicting disease outcome and planning treatment regimen.

Patients included in the present study comprised 21 (63.6%) males and 12 (36.4%) females, with a mean age of 53.79±8.05 years. Similarly, in the study of El-Ghammaz et al. [15], males outnumbered females (38 vs. 33), and the median age of the studied patients was 57 years. In the study of Abousamra et al. [16], males constituted 66.2% of the studied patients with CLL, and the mean±SD patients’ age was 59.9±6.78 years.

On examination, five (15.2%) patients of our series had lymphadenopathy, six (18.2%) patients had hepatosplenomegaly, and 19 (57.6%) patients had positive B symptoms. These findings accord with that reported by Hassan et al. [17], who reported splenomegaly in 66.7% and hepatomegaly in 43.3% of 30 patients with CLL. However, in the study of Kamel et al. [18], among 78 patients with newly diagnosed CLL, 49.3% of patients had hepatomegaly, 64.2% had splenomegaly, and 83.6% had lymphadenopathy. This is simply explained by the heterogeneous patients’ characteristics among various studies according to disease stage and treatment response.

Regarding laboratory data, patients included in the current study had a mean hemoglobin level of 10.65±3 g/dl, platelets count of 177.4±82×109/l, TLC of 58.1±49.5×109/l, and lymphocyte count of 61±48.6×109/l. These data generally accord with that reported by the study of Payandeh et al. [19], in their 109 patients with CLL research.

Other laboratory data showed elevated β2 microglobulin in 15 (45.5%) patients and elevated LDH in 26 (78%) patients. Both markers are important prognostic factors for CLL as reported by Labib et al. [20]. Prognostic Rai classification in the present study involved low-risk disease in seven (22.0%) patients, intermediate-risk disease in nine (27.0%) patients, and high-risk disease in 17 (51.0%) patients. This is in accordance with the study of Assem et al. [21], who found that 48.0% of their study patients were classified as high-risk patients, whereas the remainder is of low and intermediate risk.

Further cytogenetic and immunological analysis of our study patients revealed abnormal cytogenetics in 20% of 15 cases, positive CD38 in 37.5% out of eight cases, positive ZAP-70 in 28.6% out of seven cases, and positive Coombs test in 29.4% 17 cases. In comparison, abnormal cytogenetics was detected in 52% and CD38 was positive in 60% of patients included in the study of Saad et al. [22], on 25 patients with CLL, whereas in the study of Abousamra et al. [16], ZAP-70 was positive in 47.8% of patients.

With respect to response, patients included in the present study experienced PD in 13 (39.3%) cases, CR in two (6.06%) cases, PR in 10 (30.03%) cases, and no response in eight (24.24%) cases. Correspondingly, El-Kinawy et al. [23] reported unfavorable outcome in most patients (55.0%) in their series evaluating the prognostic factors in 40 patients with CLL.

Correlation analysis of CXCR4 with other clinical and laboratory values declared a statistically significant inverse correlation between CXCR4 levels and hemoglobin concentration and platelet count and a statistically significant correlation between CXCR4 and TLC, lymphocyte count, LDH, β2 microglobulin, and Rai stage at the start of the study and after 6 months.

These data are in agreement with the study of Barretina et al. [24], who studied CXCR4 expression in B-cell CLL and noted a significant correlation between CXCR4 and TLC and lymphocyte count.

Although no studies reported the relation between CXCR4 and LDH in patients with CLL, the study of Guo et al. [25] found a statistically significant correlation between CXCR4 and LDH levels in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma.

Moreover, the study of Ghobrial et al. [26] noted a significant increase in CXCR4 with increased Rai stage in their study investigating the clinical relevance of chemokine receptor expression on the progression of B-cell CLL in 45 patients with B-cell CLL.

Perusing relation between CXCR4 expression and the clinical data in the present study, we noticed a significantly higher CXCR4 values in patients with positive B symptoms. The study of Kubeczko et al. [27] noted that patients with CLL with positive B symptoms had significantly higher levels of multiple chemokines, including IFNγ, CCL3, and CCL4, but not as in our study.

Our results agree with the study by Kriston et al. [28], who studied 80 patients with CLL and found an inverse correlation between BM stromal cell-induced apoptosis protection and their CXCR4 expression level. Furthermore, CLL cells with low CXCR4 expression were more dependent on the microenvironmental stimuli for survival.

  Conclusion Top

CXCR4 expression in patients with CLL showed a statistically significant inverse correlation with hemoglobin concentration and platelet count.

In addition, it showed a statistically significant positive correlation with TLC, lymphocyte count, LDH, β2 microglobulin, and Rai stage at the start of the study and after 6 months.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

  References Top
1.Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). Cancer stat facts − chronic lymphocytic leukemia. 2017. Avaiable at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/clyl.htm. [Accessed July 11, 2017].  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Dighiero G, Hamblin T. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Lancet 2008; 371:1017–1029.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Rodrigues CA, Gonçalves MV, Ikoma MR, Lorand-Metze I, Pereira AD, Farias DL et al. Erratum to “Diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Recommendations from the Brazilian Group of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia” [Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016;38(4):346-357]. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2017; 39:93–94.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Calin GA, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, Bichi R, Zupo S, Noch E et al. Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:15524–15529.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Stamatopoulos K, Belessi C, Papadaki T, Stavroyianni N, Hadzidimitriou A, Kosmas C et al. Somatic hypermutation patterns in germinal center B cell malignancies. Hematology 2003; 8:319–328.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, Chastang C, Piguet H, Goasguen J et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer 1981; 48:198–206.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1975; 46:219–234.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Li SH, Dong WC, Fan L, Wang GS. Suppression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia progression by CXCR4 inhibitor WZ811. Am J Transl Res 2016; 8:3812–3821.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Payne S, Drinkwater R, Baretto M, Duddridge MJ. Browning, expression of chemokine receptors CXCR4, CXCR5 and CCR7 on B and T lymphocytes from patients with primary antibody deficiency. Clin Exp Immunol 2009; 156:254–262.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Ma Q, Jones D, Borghesani PR, Segal RA, Nagasawa T, Kishimoto T et al. Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:9448–9453.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Hallek M. Signaling the end of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: new frontline treatment strategies. Blood 2013; 122:3723–3734.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.Blachly JS, Maly J. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: exploiting vulnerabilities with targeted agents. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2016; 11:52–60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Parikh SA, Strati P, Tsang M, West CP, Shanafelt TD. Should IGHV status and FISH testing be performed in all CLL patients at diagnosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood 2016; 127:1752–1760.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.Choi MY, Kashyap MK, Kumar D. The chronic lymphocytic leukemia microenvironment: beyond the B-cell receptor. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2016; 29:40–53.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.El-Ghammaz AM, Abdelwahed E, Mostafa NN, Mansour DA. De novo deletion 17p13.1 as a predictor for disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Exp Med 2015; 15:493–499.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Abousamra NK, El-Din MS, Azmy E. T-cell CD38 expression in B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Hematol Oncol 2009; 27:82–89.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Hassan DA, Samy RM, Abd-Elrahim OT, Salib CS. Study of fibromodulin gene expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2011; 23:11–15.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Kamel AM, El-Sharkawy NM, Osman RA, Abd El-Fattah EK, El-Noshokaty E, Abd El-Hamid T et al. Adhesion molecules expression in CLL: potential impact on clinical and hematological parameters. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2016; 28:31–37.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Payandeh M, Sadeghi E, Sadeghi M. Survival and clinical aspects for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Kermanshah. Iran Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16:7987–7990.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Labib HA, Hassanein M, Etewa RL. 2014Serum copper is a simple but valuable prognostic marker in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Int J Hematol 100:575–581.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Assem M, Abdel Hamid T, Kohla S, Arsanyos S. The prognostic significance of combined expression of ZAP-70 and CD38 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2009; 21:287–297.  Back to cited text no. 21
    22.Saad AA, El-Shennawy D, El-Hagracy RS, Hamed AI, El-Feky MA, Ismail MA. Prognostic value of lipoprotein lipase expression among Egyptian B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2008; 20:323–329.  Back to cited text no. 22
    23.El-Kinawy NS, Sharaf HM, El-Hamid MA. Prognostic significance of del 17p, ZAP-70 and CD38 as independent indicators for B-CLL: correlation to response to treatment and disease outcome. Egypt J Med Human Genet 2012; 13:173–181.  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Barretina J, Junca J, Llano A, Gutierrez A, Flores A, Blanco J et al. CXCR4 and SDF-1 expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and stage of the disease. Ann Hematol 2003; 82:500–505.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Guo Q, Wang JJ, Li F, Yang HL, Yu Y, Zhao ZG et al. Expressions of VEGF and CXCR4 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and their clinical significances. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2013; 21:383–386.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Ghobrial IM, Bone ND, Stenson MJ, Novak A, Hedin KE, Kay NE et al. Expression of the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR7 and disease progression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79:318–325.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.Kubeczko M, Nowara E, Karwasiecka D, Siewior G, Czajka-Francuz P, Chudek J et al. C-C motif ligand 11 reduction in CLL patients serum after vitamin D supplementation. Hematology 2016; 21:343–350.  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.Kriston C, Plander M, Márk Á, Sebestyén A, Bugyik E, Matolcsy A et al. In contrast to high CD49d, low CXCR4 expression indicates the dependency of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells on the microenvironment. Ann Hematol 2018; 97:2145–2152.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]

 

Top  

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif