Exome-Wide Pan-Cancer Analysis of Germline Variants in 8,719 Individuals Finds Little Evidence of Rare Variant Associations

Guan Z. · Shen R. · Begg C.B.

Author affiliations

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud Rent for 48h to view Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud Printing and saving restrictions apply Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Brief Report

Received: December 21, 2020
Accepted: August 30, 2021
Published online: October 29, 2021

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HHE

Abstract

Background: Many cancer types show considerable heritability, and extensive research has been done to identify germline susceptibility variants. Linkage studies have discovered many rare high-risk variants, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered many common low-risk variants. However, it is believed that a considerable proportion of the heritability of cancer remains unexplained by known susceptibility variants. The “rare variant hypothesis” proposes that much of the missing heritability lies in rare variants that cannot reliably be detected by linkage analysis or GWAS. Until recently, high sequencing costs have precluded extensive surveys of rare variants, but technological advances have now made it possible to analyze rare variants on a much greater scale. Objectives: In this study, we investigated associations between rare variants and 14 cancer types. Methods: We ran association tests using whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and validated the findings using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium (PCAWG). Results: We identified four significant associations in TCGA, only one of which was replicated in PCAWG (BRCA1 and ovarian cancer). Conclusions: Our results provide little evidence in favor of the rare variant hypothesis. Much larger sample sizes may be needed to detect undiscovered rare cancer variants.

© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Mucci LA, Hjelmborg JB, Harris JR, Czene K, Havelick DJ, Scheike T, et al.; Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration. Familial risk and heritability of cancer among twins in Nordic countries. JAMA. 2016 Jan;315(1):68–76. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994 Oct;266(5182):66–71. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, Swift S, Seal S, Mangion J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature. 1995 Dec;378(6559):789–92. Sud A, Kinnersley B, Houlston RS. Genome-wide association studies of cancer: current insights and future perspectives. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Nov;17(11):692–704. Rahman N. Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes. Nature. 2014 Jan;505(7483):302–8. Qing T, Mohsen H, Marczyk M, Ye Y, O’Meara T, Zhao H, et al. Germline variant burden in cancer genes correlates with age at diagnosis and somatic mutation burden. Nat Commun. 2020 May;11(1):2438. Sampson JN, Wheeler WA, Yeager M, Panagiotou O, Wang Z, Berndt SI, et al. Analysis of heritability and shared heritability based on genome-wide association studies for thirteen cancer types. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Oct;107(12):djv279. Dai J, Shen W, Wen W, Chang J, Wang T, Chen H, et al. Estimation of heritability for nine common cancers using data from genome-wide association studies in Chinese population. Int J Cancer. 2017 Jan;140(2):329–36. Antoniou AC, Easton DF. Models of genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Oncogene. 2006 Sep;25(43):5898–905. Zhang H, Ahearn TU, Lecarpentier J, Barnes D, Beesley J, Qi G, et al.; kConFab Investigators; ABCTB Investigators; EMBRACE Study; GEMO Study Collaborators. Genome-wide association study identifies 32 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci from overall and subtype-specific analyses. Nat Genet. 2020 Jun;52(6):572–81. Pritchard JK. Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases? Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jul;69(1):124–37. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009 Oct;461(7265):747–53. Gibson G. Rare and common variants: twenty arguments. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(2):135–145. Zuk O, Schaffner SF, Samocha K, Do R, Hechter E, Kathiresan S, et al. Searching for missing heritability: designing rare variant association studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(4):E455–E464. Wray NR, Wijmenga C, Sullivan PF, Yang J, Visscher PM. Common disease is more complex than implied by the core gene omnigenic model. Cell. 2018 Jun;173(7):1573–80. Lee S, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M, Lin X. Rare-variant association analysis: study designs and statistical tests. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul;95(1):5–23. Rotunno M, Barajas R, Clyne M, Hoover E, Simonds NI, Lam TK, et al. A systematic literature review of whole exome and genome sequencing population studies of genetic susceptibility to cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Aug;29(8):1519–34. Kanchi KL, Johnson KJ, Lu C, McLellan MD, Leiserson MD, Wendl MC, et al. Integrated analysis of germline and somatic variants in ovarian cancer. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):3156. Cybulski C, Carrot-Zhang J, Kluźniak W, Rivera B, Kashyap A, Wokołorczyk D, et al. Germline RECQL mutations are associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2015 Jun;47(6):643–6. Rand KA, Rohland N, Tandon A, Stram A, Sheng X, Do R, et al.; African Ancestry Prostate Cancer GWAS Consortium; ELLIPSE/GAME-ON Consortium. Whole-exome sequencing of over 4100 men of African ancestry and prostate cancer risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2016 Jan;25(2):371–81. Roberts NJ, Norris AL, Petersen GM, Bondy ML, Brand R, Gallinger S, et al. Whole genome sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016 Feb;6(2):166–75. Dai W, Zheng H, Cheung AK, Tang CS, Ko JMY, Wong BWY, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies MST1R as a genetic susceptibility gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(12):3317–3322. Chubb D, Broderick P, Dobbins SE, Frampton M, Kinnersley B, Penegar S, et al. Rare disruptive mutations and their contribution to the heritable risk of colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2016 Jun;7(1):11883. Koboldt DC, Kanchi KL, Gui B, Larson DE, Fulton RS, Isaacs WB, et al. Rare variation in TET2 is associated with clinically relevant prostate carcinoma in African Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1456–63. Karyadi DM, Geybels MS, Karlins E, Decker B, McIntosh L, Hutchinson A, et al. Whole exome sequencing in 75 high-risk families with validation and replication in independent case-control studies identifies TANGO2, OR5H14, and CHAD as new prostate cancer susceptibility genes. Oncotarget. 2017 Jan;8(1):1495–507. Litchfield K, Levy M, Dudakia D, Proszek P, Shipley C, Basten S, et al. Rare disruptive mutations in ciliary function genes contribute to testicular cancer susceptibility. Nat Commun. 2016 Dec;7(1):13840. Tiao G, Improgo MR, Kasar S, Poh W, Kamburov A, Landau DA, et al. Rare germline variants in ATM are associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2017 Oct;31(10):2244–7. Dicks E, Song H, Ramus SJ, Oudenhove EV, Tyrer JP, Intermaggio MP, et al. Germline whole exome sequencing and large-scale replication identifies FANCM as a likely high grade serous ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Oncotarget. 2017 Mar;8(31):50930–40. Grant RC, Denroche RE, Borgida A, Virtanen C, Cook N, Smith AL, et al. Exome-wide association study of pancreatic cancer risk. Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):719–722.e3. Yu Y, Hu H, Chen JS, Hu F, Fowler J, Scheet P, et al. Integrated case-control and somatic-germline interaction analyses of melanoma susceptibility genes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018 Jun;1864(6 6 Pt B):2247–54. Litchfield K, Loveday C, Levy M, Dudakia D, Rapley E, Nsengimana J, et al. Large-scale sequencing of testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) cases excludes major TGCT predisposition gene. Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):828–31. Artomov M, Stratigos AJ, Kim I, Kumar R, Lauss M, Reddy BY, et al. Rare variant, gene-based association study of hereditary melanoma using whole-exome sequencing. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Dec;109(12):djx083. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx083. Mijuskovic M, Saunders EJ, Leongamornlert DA, Wakerell S, Whitmore I, Dadaev T, et al. Rare germline variants in DNA repair genes and the angiogenesis pathway predispose prostate cancer patients to develop metastatic disease. Br J Cancer. 2018 Jul;119(1):96–104. Cirulli ET, White S, Read RW, Elhanan G, Metcalf WJ, Tanudjaja F, et al. Genome-wide rare variant analysis for thousands of phenotypes in over 70,000 exomes from two cohorts. Nat Commun. 2020 Jan;11(1):542. Van Hout CV, Tachmazidou I, Backman JD, Hoffman JD, Liu D, Pandey AK, et al.; Geisinger-Regeneron DiscovEHR Collaboration; Regeneron Genetics Center. Exome sequencing and characterization of 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):749–56. Carter H, Marty R, Hofree M, Gross AM, Jensen J, Fisch KM, et al. Interaction landscape of inherited polymorphisms with somatic events in cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017 Apr;7(4):410–23. Lu C, Xie M, Wendl MC, Wang J, McLellan MD, Leiserson MD, et al. Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types. Nat Commun. 2015 Dec;6(1):10086. Huang KL, Mashl RJ, Wu Y, Ritter DI, Wang J, Oh C, et al.; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Pathogenic germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers. Cell. 2018 Apr;173(2):355–370.e14. Oak N, Cherniack AD, Mashl RJ, Hirsch FR, Ding L, Beroukhim R, et al.; TCGA Analysis Network. Ancestry-specific predisposing germline variants in cancer. Genome Med. 2020 May;12(1):51. Madsen BE, Browning SR. A groupwise association test for rare mutations using a weighted sum statistic. PLoS Genet. 2009 Feb;5(2):e1000384. Wu MC, Lee S, Cai T, Li Y, Boehnke M, Lin X. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Jul;89(1):82–93. Lee S, Emond MJ, Bamshad MJ, Barnes KC, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA, et al.; NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project—ESP Lung Project Team. Optimal unified approach for rare-variant association testing with application to small-sample case-control whole-exome sequencing studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug;91(2):224–37. Sha Q, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang S. Detecting association of rare and common variants by testing an optimally weighted combination of variants. Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;36(6):561–71. ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):82–93. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al.; Genome Aggregation Database Consortium. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):434–43. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016 Jun;17(1):122. Buckley AR, Standish KA, Bhutani K, Ideker T, Lasken RS, Carter H, et al. Pan-cancer analysis reveals technical artifacts in TCGA germline variant calls. BMC Genomics. 2017 Jun;18(1):458. Rasnic R, Brandes N, Zuk O, Linial M. Substantial batch effects in TCGA exome sequences undermine pan-cancer analysis of germline variants. BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug;19(1):783. Rohozinski J, Diaz-Arrastia C, Edwards CL. Do some epithelial ovarian cancers originate from a fallopian tube ciliate cell lineage? Med Hypotheses. 2017 Sep;107:16–21. Lee S, Wu MC, Lin X. Optimal tests for rare variant effects in sequencing association studies. Biostatistics. 2012 Sep;13(4):762–75. Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Dec;8(12):1117–21. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Brief Report

Received: December 21, 2020
Accepted: August 30, 2021
Published online: October 29, 2021

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/HHE

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif