Clinical manifestations of COVID‐19 differ by age and obesity status

1 INTRODUCTION

Age and obesity status are both major determinants of host response to pathogens, including during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.1, 2 Incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears to be increasing in children, paralleling adult trends.3 Most infected children are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. However, hospitalization rates have been increasing among children and adolescents starting in the spring of 2021.4 Obesity is a prevalent comorbidity in both adults and children hospitalized with severe COVID-19.5, 6 The likelihood of hospitalization and risk for severe COVID-19 increases with higher body mass index (BMI) in adults may be associated with chronic inflammation disrupting immune responses and impairing pulmonary function.7-9 The elevated risk of complications in obese individuals was reflected in the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)'s inclusion of obesity as high-risk condition for COVID-19 vaccine prioritization in the initial guidelines before widespread availability10 and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Emergency Use Authorization for receipt of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody.11

Most published data have focused on disease presentation and prognosis of hospitalized individuals, but the majority of COVID-19 infected individuals are managed outside of the hospital. Less data are available on COVID-19 infected non-hospitalized individuals with overweight or obesity (OWOB), and very few studies have focused on COVID-19 in children with OWOB.12-14 This prospective study analyzes differences in symptom types and duration as well as SARS-CoV-2 laboratory parameters by age and obesity status in predominantly outpatient COVID-19-positive patients reflective of the majority of COVID-19 cases in the general population.

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 Study design and participants

We enrolled individuals within 2 weeks of exposure to a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 household contact into the Household Exposure and Respiratory Virus Transmission and Immunity Study (HEARTS). We recruited household members of individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) laboratory using a convenience recruitment strategy. Those who have specimens tested at the laboratory include symptomatic and asymptomatic staff and patients of CHLA and network outpatient clinics. Recruitment fliers were also posted at community testing sites near the hospital. At enrollment, individuals answered a questionnaire that included demographic information, comorbidities, and exposure history. Participants logged illness symptoms and symptom severity in a daily symptom diary for 28 days; study staff followed up on the symptom diary over the phone or at in-person follow-up visits every 3–7 days. Parents/guardians completed questionnaires and recorded symptoms for children unable to record for themselves. COVID-19-associated symptoms were defined (and grouped) as experiencing at least one of the following: fever, chills, headache, fatigue, muscle aches (constitutional); runny nose, congestion, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, wheeze (respiratory); altered smell, altered taste (neurologic); vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain (gastrointestinal). Data was recorded using Research Electronic Data Capture software (REDCap Consortium, Vanderbilt, Tennessee, USA). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Participants presented for nasopharyngeal (NP) swab collection, performed by trained study staff every three to 7 days until two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were obtained in the entire household or they reached their sixth visit. Saliva samples were also collected at each of these visits from able individuals. Blood was collected at the first visit and a convalescent visit at least 4 weeks after all household members tested negative. Height and weight were measured at the first visit. The Children's BMI Tool for Schools from the CDC was used to calculate BMI percentiles factoring in age and sex for children and teens that are 2–19 years old.15 For individuals 20 years or older, BMI was interpreted using standard weight status categories as follows: BMI < 18.5 underweight, 18.5–24.9 normal weight, 25–29.9 overweight, ≥30 obese.15 BMI charts are not recommended for clinical use in children under 2 years of age.

2.2 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR

We tested for SARS-CoV-2 using the CDC protocol approved by the Food and Drug Administration for Emergency Use Authorization.16 Briefly, total nucleic acid was extracted from 200-μl NP swab samples using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) and eluted to 50 μl of total nucleic acid. RT-PCR was performed using primers and probes that targeted the N1, N2 and RnaseP (RNP, internal control) genes (IDT, Coralville, IW) with 1-Step Taqpath Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on QuantStudio 5 (Applied Biosystem, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A positive result was defined as cycle threshold (Ct) value less than 40 for both N1 and N2. A valid result for SARS-CoV-2 detection was determined by RNP using a cut-off of Ct value <32. An inconclusive result was defined as either N1 or N2 gene detected only with RNP detection.

2.3 SARS-CoV-2 serology

Serum SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and spike IgG antibody was measured using an ELISA as previously described.17 A positive cut-off OD490 value of 0.2 was used for RBD IgG detection based on the published protocol and the mean of the negative control values plus three standard deviations (SDs) from 20 blood samples collected between 2017 and 2019. IgG against the spike antigen was used to confirm RBD IgG positivity. Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated using IgG OD490 values from 5 serial diluted samples (1:100–8100) tested against the spike antigen.

2.4 Statistics

COVID-19 onset was defined as the earlier date between the first symptom presentation and first PCR positivity. For comparisons of the PCR Ct values between individuals, we used the lowest RT-PCR Ct value from NP swabs obtained within the first 7 days from COVID-19 onset. For the length of PCR positivity calculation, subjects were included if they had a PCR positivity end date, defined as the last date of a positive test before a PCR negative or inconclusive result. For comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, we used the highest spike protein-specific IgG AUC between 14 and 90 days of COVID-19 onset. For comparisons of obesity categories, overweight and obese (OWOB) were grouped together and compared with non-OWOB individuals.

Comparisons of categorical variables were calculated using Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for comparison of non-parametric data. Independent sample t tests were used for comparison of normally distributed continuous variables or for log-transformed data. Multiple logistic regression using the backward selection method was used to determine predictors of symptoms. Factors with p < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and RStudio Version 1.3.1093 (RStudio Inc., Boston, MA, USA). All tests were two-tailed with p < 0.05 considered significant.

3 RESULTS

We enrolled 560 individuals from June 17, 2020 to January 31, 2021; all had exposure to a household member with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those, 4 were excluded because they did not present for NP PCR testing; 4 others were excluded due to prior documented COVID-19 infection greater than 3 months before enrollment. The remaining 552 individuals underwent NP swab testing for PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2; 399 (72.3%) also provided saliva for PCR testing. Blood was obtained from 476 (86.2%) participants at enrollment and from 283 (51.3%) at a convalescent visit. A total of 470 (85.1%) participants had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection as defined by a positive PCR result via NP or saliva sampling and/or positive serology. Five patients had inconclusive PCR results with negative serology at enrollment and no available convalescent serology; they were excluded from the analyses due to inability to classify them as case or non-case. Therefore, we analyzed 547 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and non-cases.

Participant ages ranged from 1 month to 84 years, including 308 (56.3%) adults ≥18 years old and 239 (43.7%) children <18 years old. Ethnicity in the cohort was characterized by a strong Hispanic/Latinx predominance, which reflects the surrounding community served by our institution. Among all enrolled subjects, 107 (19.6%) reported an underlying medical condition; asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular conditions were most common. BMI of all subjects ≥2 years old averaged 25.9 ± SD 6.0 kg/m2. Nearly two-thirds (307 [62.0%]) were with OWOB, including a large proportion of enrolled adults (229 [74.6%]) and children (116 [61.7%]). Characteristics of the 547 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and non-cases are shown in Table 1. The characteristics more common in COVID-19 cases compared with non-cases were Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity and lower household income (p = 0.001 and 0.044, respectively).

TABLE 1. Characteristics of COVID-19 cases and non-cases Characteristic Cases n = 470 (%) Non-cases n = 77 (%) p value Sex 0.15 Male 209 (44.5) 41 (53.2) Female 261 (55.5) 36 (46.8) Age group 0.23 ≤12 years old 148 (31.5) 20 (26.0) 13–17 years old 61 (13.0) 10 (13.0) 18–29 years old 103 (21.9) 12 (15.6) 30–54 years old 136 (28.9) 28 (36.4) ≥55 years old 22 (4.7) 7 (9.1) Ethnicity 0.001 Hispanic 444 (94.5) 65 (84.4) Not Hispanic 26 (5.6) 12 (15.6) Race White 455 (96.6) 71 (93.4) 0.079 African American 1 (0.2) 2 (2.6) Asian 11 (2.3) 3 (3.9) Multiple 4 (0.8) 0 (0) BMI category 0.66 Underweight 4 (0.9) 1 (1.4) Normal 120 (28.3) 25 (35.2) Overweight 136 (32.1) 20 (28.2) Obese 164 (38.7) 25 (35.2) Underlying conditionsb 89 (18.9) 18 (23.4) 0.36 Allergies 18 (3.8) 2 (2.6) Asthma or other chronic lung disease 37 (7.9) 8 (10.5) Heart condition 28 (5.9) 5 (6.6) Diabetes 24 (5.1) 3 (3.9) Renal disease 4 (0.8) 1 (1.3) Liver disease 1 (0.2) 0 (0) Cancer or other immunosuppression 3 (0.6) 2 (2.6) Neurologic/genetic conditions 9 (1.9) 2 (2.6) Currently pregnant 5 (1.1) 0 (0) Taking long term prescription medication/devicec 54 (11.5) 11 (14.3) 0.48 Smoker 6 (7.8) 20 (4.3) 0.18 Smoker in the household 41 (8.7) 4 (5.2) 0.30 Income 0.044 Less than $20,000 114 (24.3) 17 (22.1) $20,000 to $34,999 208 (44.3) 25 (32.5) $35,000 to $49,999 58 (12.3) 9 (11.7) $50,000 to $74,999 46 (9.8) 14 (18.2) $75,000 to 99,999 24 (5.1) 4 (5.2) Over $100,000 20 (4.3) 8 (10.4) Traveled in the past month 6 (1.3) 0 (0) 1.0 Note: The proportions of each group within cases versus non-cases are compared. a All characteristics are self-reported except body mass index (BMI) for which height and weight were measured. b Does not include obesity. c Device includes continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine.

Of 470 subjects with confirmed COVID-19, 262 (55.7%) were symptomatic and 208 (44.3%) were asymptomatic. Adults were more likely to be symptomatic compared with children (59.8 vs. 50.7%, p = 0.05). More individuals with OWOB were symptomatic compared to individuals without OWOB (59.0 vs. 46.8%, p = 0.021). In a multivariable analysis, only higher BMI and higher household income were associated with higher odds of self-reporting symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 1.05 and 1.51, p = 0.002 and <0.001, respectively) (Table 2). No participants received an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody or other outpatient treatment. Six subjects were hospitalized at the time of COVID-19 positivity, but only three hospitalizations (ages: 13, 17, and 45 years old; BMI status: obese, normal, overweight, respectively) were secondary to COVID-19-related complications.

TABLE 2. Factors associated with increased odds of symptomatic versus asymptomatic infection in 470 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases Characteristicsa Symptomatic n = 262/470 (55.7%) Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis Odds ratio (95% CI) p value Odds ratio (95% CI) p value Ageb 1.01 (0.10–1.02) 0.21 — — ≤12 years old 74 (50.0) — — — — 13–17 years old 32 (52.5) — — — — 18–29 years old 58 (56.3) — — — — 30–54 years old 85 (62.5) — — — — ≥55 years old 13 (59.1) — — — — Male sex 113 (54.1) 0.89 (0.61–1.28) 0.51 — — Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity 244 (55.0) 0.954 (0.23–1.27) 0.16 — — Race White 250 (55.1) — ≥0.99 — — African American 0 (0) — ≥0.99 — — Asian 8 (72.7) — ≥0.99 — — Multiple 4 (100) — — — — BMI — 1.05 (1.02–1.09) 0.002 1.05 (1.01–1.08) 0.005 Underweight 0 (0) — — — — Normal 58 (48.3) — — — — Overweight 80 (58.8) — — — — Obese 97 (59.1) — — — — Underlying conditionsc 57 (64.0) 0.65 (0.406–1.05) 0.081 0.63 (0.38–1.06) 0.079 Taking long term prescription medication/deviced 23 (42.6) 0.93 (0.52–1.64) 0.79 — — Smoker 11 (55.0) 1.03 (0.42–2.54) 0.95 — — Smoker in household 21 (51.2) 1.22 (0.64–2.32) 0.54 — — Household incomeb 1.51 (1.29–1.77) <0.001 1.50 (1.28–1.77) <0.001 Less than $20,000 39 (34.2) — — — — $20,000 to $34,999 125 (60.1) — — — — $35,000 to $49, 999 31 (53.4) — — — — $50,000 to $74,999 34 (73.9) — — — — $75,000 to 99,999 13 (54.2) — — — — over $100,000 20 (100) — — — — Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval a All characteristics are self-reported except BMI for which height and weight were measured. b Age, BMI, and household income entered into logistic regression model as continuous or ordinal variables; categories are shown for reference only. c Does not include obesity. d Device includes continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine.

Symptomatic individuals reported a median of 3 (interquartile [IQR] range 2–4) symptoms that lasted a median of 7 (IQR 4–11) days (Figure 1). For almost all symptoms, adolescents aged 12–17 years old had symptom frequency, distribution, and duration similar to adults ≥18 years old; the exceptions were headache, loss of taste and loss of smell, with incidence between those of adults and younger children <12 years old. Therefore, we grouped adolescents with adults for comparison with younger children <12 years old (Figure 1). Younger children had fewer symptoms (median 2 [IQR 1–3] vs. 3 [IQR 2–5], p < 0.001) that lasted fewer days (median 5 [IQR 3–7] vs. 7 [IQR 5–13], p < 0.001) compared with adolescents and adults. Younger children had more fever and diarrhea, but adults and adolescents reported more fatigue, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, headache, and altered taste and smell (all p < 0.05). Fever and cough lasted longer in adolescents and adults compared with younger children (p = 0.016 and 0.001, respectively). Of those symptomatic, adolescents and adults (individuals ≥12 years old) reported moderate or severe symptoms more often than children <12 years old (18.6% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.048).

image

Symptoms in adolescents and adults ≥12 years old (yo) versus children <12 yo. Children <12 yo experience more fever and diarrhea, but adolescents and adults have more chills, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, and altered smell and taste (all p < 0.05). Fever and cough lasted longer in adults and adolescents (p = 0.016 and 0.001, respectively)

Individuals with OWOB suffered from more symptoms compared with individuals without OWOB (median 3 [IQR 2–4] vs. 2 [IQR 1–3], p = 0.037) (Figure 2). Individuals with OWOB experienced significantly more cough (82 [27.3%] vs. 21 [16.9%], p = 0.023), shortness of breath (21 [7.0%] vs. 2 [1.6%], p = 0.026), and altered taste (52 [17.3] vs. 12 [9.7%], 0.045). The frequency of reported moderate or severe symptoms were similar in the two groups (17.9% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.31). The median symptom duration was also similar between the two groups (median 7 [IQR 4–11] vs. 6.54-11 days, p = 0.39).

image

Symptoms in individuals with overweight and obese (OWOB) compared with individuals without OWOB. Individuals with OWOB experienced more cough, shortness of breath, and altered taste compared with individuals without OWOB (p = 0.023, 0.026, and 0.045, respectively). The duration of symptoms was similar between the two groups

We further examined if experiencing obesity impacted the severity of illness by age group in individuals with known BMI status (Figure 3). In the 120 younger children <12 years old, there were no significant differences in the presence, number, or duration of symptoms in children of different BMI categories. Evaluation of the 68 adolescents, however, revealed significantly more frequent presence of symptoms among adolescent with OWOB compared with those without (20 [66.7%] vs 13 [34.2%], p = 0.008), including constitutional symptoms (15 [50.0%] vs. 8 [21.1%], p = 0.012) and respiratory symptoms (16 [53.3%] vs. 8 [21.1%], p = 0.006). Respiratory symptoms lasted longer in adolescents with OWOB (median 7 [IQR 2–9] vs. 4 [IQR 1–6] days, p = 0.049). Duration of constitutional, neurologic and gastrointestinal symptoms were similar. In the 307 adults, only presence of shortness of breath differed between individuals with OWOB compared with those without (19 [8.3%] vs. 1 [1.3%], p = 0.030). Duration was similar for all symptoms.

image

COVID-19 associated symptoms by age group and obesity status. Adolescents 12–17 years old (yo) with overweight and obese (OWOB) experience more constitutional and respiratory symptoms compared with adolescents without OWOB (p = 0.020 and 0.010, respectively)

Differences in laboratory parameters were evaluated by symptom presentation, age group, and obesity status (Table 3). In a comparison of the lowest RT-PCR Ct values from NP swabs obtained within the first 7 days of COVID-19 onset, symptomatic individuals and younger children <12 years had lower Ct values compared with asymptomatic participants and those in the adolescent and adult age groups, respectively (p = 0.001 and 0.022, Table 3). No differences were observed in individuals with OWOB compared with individuals without OWOB. Duration of PCR positivity was longer in symptomatic individuals compared with asymptomatic individuals (17.5 vs. 8.4 days p = 0.014), but no differences in duration was found by age or obesity status. COVID-19 spike-specific IgG AUC did not differ by presence of symptoms, age or obesity status.

TABLE 3. Laboratory parameters associated with symptoms, age, and obesity status Characteristic (n) Laboratory parameter p value RT-PCR Ct valuea Symptomatic (141) 23.8 0.001 Asymptomatic (92) 27.3 <12 years old (93) 23.9 0.022 ≥12 years old (140) 26.0 Non-obese/overweight (71) 26.4 0.19 Obese/overweight (135) 25.1 Duration of PCR detection (days)b Symptomatic (204) 17.5 0.014 Asymptomatic (101) 8.4 years old (81) 15.1 0.84 ≥12 years old (224) 14.3 Non-obese/overweight (90) 16.1 0.27 Obese/overweight (192) 12.7 COVID-19 spike protein IgG (AUC)c

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif