Machine learning predictive models of LDL-C in the population of eastern India and its comparison with directly measured and calculated LDL-C

1. Chareonrungrueangchai, K, Wongkawinwoot, K, Anothaisintawee, T, et al. Dietary factors and risks of cardiovascular diseases: an umbrella review. Nutrients 2020; 12(4): 1088.
Google Scholar | Crossref2. Penson, PE, Pirro, M, Banach, M. LDL-C: lower is better for longer-even at low risk. BMC Med 2020; 18(1): 320–326.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Arnett, DK, Blumenthal, RS, Albert, MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74(10): e177–e232.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. National Cholesterol Education Program (US). Expert Panel on Detection, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults . Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). National Cholesterol Education Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 2002.
Google Scholar5. Chung, S . Update on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol quantification. Curr Opinion Lipidol 2019; 30(4): 273–283.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Nauck, M, Warnick, GR, Rifai, N. Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem 2002; 48(2): 236–254.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Friedewald, W, Levy, R, Fredrickson, D. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18(6): 499–502.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Yano, M, Matsunaga, A, Harada, S, et al. Comparison of two homogeneous LDL-cholesterol assays using fresh hypertriglyceridemic serum and quantitative ultracentrifugation fractions. J Atheroscler Thromb 2019; 26: 979–988.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Chen, Y, Zhang, X, Pan, B, et al. A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. Lipids Health Dis 2010; 9(1): 52.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Vujovic, A, Kotur-Stevuljevic, J, Spasic, S, et al. Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation. Lipids Health Dis 2010; 9(1): 27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Anandaraja, S, Narang, R, Godeswar, R, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population. Int J Cardiol 2005; 102(1): 117–120.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Puavillai, W, Laorugpongse, D. Is calculated LDL-C by using the new modified Friedewald equation better than the standard Frieldewald equation. J Med Assoc Thai 2004; 87(6): 589–593.
Google Scholar | Medline13. Hata, Y, Nakajima, K. Application of Friedewald's LDL-cholesterol estimation formula to serum lipids in the Japanese population. Jpn Circ J 1986; 50(12): 1191–1200.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Martin, S, Blaha, M, Elshazly, M, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA 2013; 310(19): 2061.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Gasko, R . Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by the Anandaraja's formula--confirmation. Lipids Health Dis 2006; 5(1): 18.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Onyenekwu, CP, Hoffmann, M, Smit, F, et al. Comparison of LDL-cholesterol estimate using the Friedewald formula and the newly proposed de Cordova formula with a directly measured LDL-cholesterol in a healthy South African population. Ann Clin Biochem 2014; 51(6): 672–679.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI17. de Cordova, CM, de Cordova, MM. A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort. Ann Clin Biochem 2013; 50(1): 13–19.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI18. Rasouli, M, Mokhtari, H. Calculation of LDL-cholesterol vs. direct homogenous assay. J Clin Lab Anal 2017; 31(3): e22057.
Google Scholar | Crossref19. Karkhaneh, A, Bagherieh, M, Sadeghi, S, et al. Evaluation of eight formulas for LDL-C estimation in Iranian subjects with different metabolic health statuses. Lipids Health Dis 2019; 18(1): 231.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Quesada, JA, Lopez-Pineda, A, Gil-Guillén, VF, et al. Machine learning to predict cardiovascular risk. Int J Cin Pract 2019; 73(10): e13389.
Google Scholar | Medline21. Jung, K, Covington, S, Sen, CK, et al. Rapid identification of slow healing wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2016 Jan; 24(1): 181–188.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Escobar, GJ, Puopolo, KM, Wi, S, et al. Stratification of risk of early-onset sepsis in newborns≥ 34 weeks’ gestation. Pediatrics 2014; 133(1): 30–36.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Pina, A, Helgadottir, S, Mancina, RM, et al. Virtual genetic diagnosis for familial hypercholesterolemia powered by machine learning. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020; 27(15): 1639–1646.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI24. Weng, SF, Reps, J, Kai, J, et al. Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? PLoS One 2017; 12(4): e0174944.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Singh, G, Hussain, Y, Xu, Z, et al. Comparing a novel machine learning method to the Friedewald formula and Martin-Hopkins equation for low-density lipoprotein estimation. PLoS One 2020; 15(9): e0239934.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Ngiam, KY, Khor, W. Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20(5): e262–e273.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Yang, L, Wu, H, Jin, X, et al. Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 5245.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Silverman, MG, Ference, BA, Im, K, et al. Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316(12): 1289–1297.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Gupta, S, Verma, M, Singh, K. Does LDL-C estimation using Anandaraja’s formula give a better agreement with direct LDL-C estimation than the Friedewald’s formula?. Indian J Clin Biochem 2012; 27(2): 127–133.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Wadhwa, N, Krishnaswamy, R. Comparison of LDL-cholesterol estimate using various formulae with directly measured LDL-cholesterol in Indian population. J Clin Diag Res 2016; 10(12): BC11–BC13.
Google Scholar | Medline31. Ephraim, RK, Acheampong, E, Swaray, SM, et al. Developing a modified low-density lipoprotein (M-LDL-C) Friedewald’s equation as a substitute for direct LDL-C measure in a Ghanaian population: a comparative study. J Lipids 2018; 2018: 7078409.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Piani, F, Cicero, AF, Ventura, F, et al. Evaluation of twelve formulas for LDL-C estimation in a large, blinded, random Italian population. Int J Cardiol 2021; 330: 221–227.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Kang, M, Kim, J, Lee, SY, et al. Martin’s equation as the most suitable method for estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults. Korean J Family Med 2017; 38(5): 263.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif