Macklon K.T. Cjm Fauser B.

The female post-cancer fertility-counselling clinic: looking beyond the freezer. A much needed addition to oncofertility care.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 39: 179-181View in Article Google ScholarAnazodo A. Laws P. Logan S. Saunders C. Travaglia J. Gerstl B. et al.

How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care.

Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25: 159-179View in Article Google ScholarAnazodo A.C. Choi S. Signorelli C. Ellis S. Johnston K. Wakefield C.E. et al.

Reproductive care of childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a 12-year evaluation.

J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2021; 10: 131-141View in Article Google ScholarNewton K. Howard A.F. Thorne S. Kelly M.T. Goddard K.

Facing the unknown: uncertain fertility in young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

J Cancer Surviv. 2021; 15: 54-65View in Article Google Scholarvan Santen H.M. van de Wetering M.D. Bos A.M.E. Vd Heuvel-Eibrink M.M. van der Pal H.J. Wallace W.H.

Reproductive complications in childhood cancer survivors.

Pediatr Clin North Am. 2020; 67: 1187-1202View in Article Google ScholarCrawshaw M.A. Sloper P.

'Swimming against the tide'--the influence of fertility matters on the transition to adulthood or survivorship following adolescent cancer.

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010; 19: 610-620View in Article Google ScholarTerenziani M. Meazza C. Massimino M. Viganò P. Gandola L. Mangili G. et al.

Female fertility preserving practices at a pediatric unit: a challenge of multiprofessional and multidisciplinary cooperation.

Tumori. 2016; 102: 174-177View in Article Google ScholarFidler M.M. Frobisher C. Hawkins M.M. Nathan P.C.

Challenges and opportunities in the care of survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers.

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019; 66e27668View in Article Google ScholarLehmann V. Chemaitilly W. Lu L. Green D.M. Kutteh W.H. Brinkman T.M. et al.

Gonadal functioning and perceptions of infertility risk among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.

J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 893-902View in Article Google ScholarYoung K. Shliakhtsitsava K. Natarajan L. Myers E. Dietz A.C. Gorman J.R. et al.

Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Cancer. 2019; 125: 980-989View in Article Google ScholarFilippi F. Meazza C. Paffoni A. Raspagliesi F. Terenziani M. Somigliana E.

Egg freezing in childhood and young adult cancer survivors.

Pediatrics. 2016; 138e20160291View in Article Google ScholarLehmann V. Kutteh W.H. Sparrow C.K. Bjornard K.L. Klosky J.L.

Fertility-related services in pediatric oncology across the cancer continuum: a clinic overview.

Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28: 3955-3964View in Article Google ScholarGreen D.M. Nolan V.G. Goodman P.J. Whitton J.A. Srivastava D. Leisenring W.M. et al.

The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014; 61: 53-67View in Article Google ScholarPastore L.M. Christianson M.S. Stelling J. Kearns W.G. Segars J.H.

Reproductive ovarian testing and the alphabet soup of diagnoses: DOR, POI, POF, POR, and FOR.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35: 17-23View in Article Google ScholarBozdag G. Calis P. Zengin D. Tanacan A. Karahan S.

Age related normogram for antral follicle count in general population and comparison with previous studies.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 206: 120-124View in Article Google ScholarDu X. Ding T. Zhang H. Zhang C. Ma W. Zhong Y. et al.

Age-specific normal reference range for serum anti-Müllerian hormone in healthy Chinese Han women: a nationwide population-based study.

Reprod Sci. 2016; 23: 1019-1027View in Article Google ScholarFerraretti A.P. La Marca A. Fauser B.C. Tarlatzis B. Nargund G. Gianaroli L.

ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.

Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 1616-1624View in Article Google ScholarSomigliana E. Lattuada D. Colciaghi B. Filippi F. La Vecchia I. Tirelli A. et al.

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone in subfertile women.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 94: 1307-1312View in Article Google ScholarZarek S.M. Mitchell E.M. Sjaarda L.A. Mumford S.L. Silver R.M. Stanford J.B. et al.

Is anti-Müllerian hormone associated with fecundability? Findings from the EAGeR Trial.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100: 4215-4221View in Article Google ScholarSteiner A.Z. Pritchard D. Stanczyk F.Z. Kesner J.S. Meadows J.W. Herring A.H. et al.

Association between biomarkers of ovarian reserve and infertility among older women of reproductive age.

J Am Med Assoc. 2017; 318: 1367-1376View in Article Google ScholarDepmann M. Eijkemans M.J.C. Broer S.L. Tehrani F.R. Solaymani-Dodaran M. Azizi F. et al.

Does AMH relate to timing of menopause? Results of an individual patient data meta- analysis.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 103: 3593-3600View in Article Google ScholarSomigliana E. Terenziani M. Filippi F. Bergamini A. Martinelli F. Mangili G. et al.

Chemotherapy-related damage to ovarian reserve in childhood cancer survivors: interpreting the evidence.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36: 341-348View in Article Google ScholarSchattman G.L.

Clinical practice. Cryopreservation of oocytes.

N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 1755-1760View in Article Google ScholarGoldman R.H. Racowsky C. Farland L.V. Munné S. Ribustello L. Fox J.H.

Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.

Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 853-859View in Article Google ScholarCobo A. García-Velasco J. Domingo J. Pellicer A. Remohí J.

Elective and onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.

Hum Reprod. 2018; 33: 2222-2231View in Article Google ScholarKuwayama M. Vajta G. Kato O. Leibo S.P.

Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11: 300-308View in Article Google ScholarRienzi L. Cobo A. Paffoni A. Scarduelli C. Capalbo A. Vajta G. et al.

Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study.

Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 1606-1612View in Article Google ScholarGameiro S. Boivin J. Peronace L. Verhaak C.M.

Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment.

Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18: 652-669View in Article Google ScholarGameiro S. Verhaak C.M. Kremer J.A. Boivin J.

Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates.

Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19: 124-135View in Article Google ScholarMassarotti C. Scaruffi P. Lambertini M. Sozzi F. Remorgida V. Anserini P.

Beyond fertility preservation: role of the oncofertility unit in the reproductive and gynecological follow-up of young cancer patients.

Hum Reprod. 2019; 34: 1462-1469View in Article Google ScholarParissone F. Di Paola R. Balter R. Garzon S. Zaffagnini S. Neri M. et al.

Female adolescents and young women previously treated for pediatric malignancies: assessment of ovarian reserve and gonadotoxicity risk stratification for early identification of patients at increased infertility risk.

J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 34: 25-33View in Article Google ScholarRoeca C. Dovey S. Polotsky A.J.

Recommendations for assessing ovarian health and fertility potential in survivors of childhood cancer.

Maturitas. 2019; 122: 57-59View in Article Google ScholarCanzi E. Accordini M. Facchin F.

'Is blood thicker than water?' Donor conceived offspring's subjective experiences of the donor: a systematic narrative review.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38: 797-807View in Article Google ScholarSkoog Svanberg A. Sydsjö G. Lampic C.

Psychosocial aspects of identity-release gamete donation—perspectives of donors, recipients, and offspring.

Ups J Med Sci. 2020; 125: 175-182View in Article Google ScholarHvidman H.W. Petersen K.B. Larsen E.C. Macklon K.T. Pinborg A. Nyboe Andersen A.

Individual fertility assessment and pro-fertility counselling; should this be offered to women and men of reproductive age?.

Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 9-15View in Article Google ScholarTremellen K. Savulescu J.

Ovarian reserve screening: a scientific and ethical analysis.

Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 2606-2614View in Article Google ScholarO'Brien Y. Kelleher C. Wingfield M.

"So what happens next?" exploring the psychological and emotional impact of anti-Mullerian hormone testing.

J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 41: 30-37View in Article Google ScholarDaan N.M. Hoek A. Corpeleijn E. Eijkemans M.J. Broekmans F.J. Fauser B.C. et al.

Reproductive characteristics of women diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 32: 225-232View in Article Google ScholarEijkemans M.J. van Poppel F. Habbema D.F. Smith K.R. Leridon H. te Velde E.R.

Too old to have children? Lessons from natural fertility populations.

Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 1304-1312View in Article Google ScholarNielsen S.N. Andersen A.N. Schmidt K.T. Rechnitzer C. Schmiegelow K. Bentzen J.G. et al.

A 10-year follow up of reproductive function in women treated for childhood cancer.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 27: 192-200View in Article Google ScholarMertes H.

Let’s not forget that many prepubertal girls do have other options besides ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 2011-2013View in Article Google ScholarGruhn J.R. Zielinska A.P. Shukla V. Blanshard R. Capalbo A. Cimadomo D. et al.

Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span.

Science. 2019; 365: 1466-1469View in Article Google ScholarKelsey T.W. Anderson R.A. Wright P. Nelson S.M. Wallace W.H.

Data-driven assessment of the human ovarian reserve.

Mol Hum Reprod. 2012; 18: 79-87View in Article Google ScholarJopling H. Yates A. Burgoyne N. Hayden K. Chaloner C. Tetlow L.

Paediatric anti-Müllerian hormone measurement: male and female reference intervals established using the automated Beckman Coulter Access AMH assay.

Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018; 1e00021View in Article Google Scholar