Per protocol analyses produced larger treatment effect sizes than intention to treat: a meta-epidemiological study

Schulz KF Altman DG Moher D

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

BMJ. 2010; 06 (2010-03-24 00): 340

Statistics and Causal Inference.

Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1986; 81: 945-960https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064Angrist JD Imbens GW Rubin DB.

Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.

Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996; 91: 444-455https://doi.org/10.2307/2291629

Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

Journal of Educational Psychology. 1974; 66: 688-701https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization.

The Annals of Statistics. 1978; 6: 34-58Hernán MA Hernández-Díaz S.

Beyond the intention to treat in comparative effectiveness research.

Clinical trials (London, England). 2012; 9 (09/23): 48-55https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774511420743

Uses and limitations of randomization-based efficacy estimators. Review.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research. August 2005; 14: 327-347https://doi.org/10.1191/0962280205sm406oaTen Have TR Normand S-LT Marcus SM Brown C Lavori P Duan N

Intent-to-treat vs. non-intent-to-treat analyses under treatment non-adherence in mental health randomized trials.

Psychiatric Annals. Dec 2008; 38: 772-783https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20081201-10

Causal Effects in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies Via Potential Outcomes: Concepts and Analytical Approaches.

Annual Review of Public Health. 2000; 21 (2000/05/01): 121-145https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.121Shrier I Steele RJ Verhagen E Herbert R Riddell CA Kaufman JS.

Beyond intention to treat: What is the right question?.

Clinical Trials. February 2014; 11: 28-37https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774513504151

Mostazir M, Taylor RS, Henley W, Watkins E. An overview of statistical methods for handling nonadherence to intervention protocol in randomized control trials: a methodological review. (1878-5921 (Electronic))

Dodd S White I Williamson P.

Departure from treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: A review.

Trials. 13 Dec 2011; 12 (Conference Abstract) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A129)Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman DG.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

PLoS Med. Jul 21 2009; 6e1000097https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Moher D, Hopewell S Fau - Schulz KF, Schulz Kf Fau - Montori V, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. (1743-9159 (Electronic))

Intention-to-treat concept: A review.

Perspectives in Clinical Research. Jul-Sep 2011; 2: 109-112https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.83221Raskob GE van Es N Verhamme P et al.

Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

N Engl J Med. Feb 15 2018; 378: 615-624https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1711948Gallant J Lazzarin A Mills A et al.

Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1489): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

The Lancet. 2017; 390: 2063-2072https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32299-7Bornstein NM Saver JL Diener HC et al.

An injectable implant to stimulate the sphenopalatine ganglion for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke up to 24 h from onset (ImpACT-24B): an international, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, pivotal trial.

The Lancet. 2019; 394: 219-229https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31192-4Caraceni P Riggio O Angeli P et al.

Long-term albumin administration in decompensated cirrhosis (ANSWER): an open-label randomised trial.

Lancet. May 31 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30840-7Kaufmann R Halm JA Eker HH et al.

Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.

Lancet. Mar 3 2018; 391: 860-869https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30298-8Harbord RM Egger M Sterne JA.

A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.

Stat Med. Oct 2006; 25: 3443-3457https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2380

Egger M, Smith Gd Fau - PhillipsAN, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. (0959-8138 (Print))

Tierney JF Stewart LA Ghersi D Burdett S Sydes MR.

Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.

Trials. 2007; 8 (2007/06/07): 16https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-16

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. 2011Borenstein M Hedges LV Higgins JPT Rothstein HR.

Introduction to Meta-Analysis.

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009

Bucher HC, Guyatt Gh Fau - GriffithLE, Griffith Le Fau - WalterSD, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (0895-4356 (Print))

Principal Stratification in Causal Inference.

Biometrics. 2002; 58: 21-29Dunn G Maracy M Tomenson B.

Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: The role of instrumental variable methods. Review.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research. August 2005; 14: 369-395https://doi.org/10.1191/0962280205sm403oa

Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with non-compliance.

Statistics in Medicine. 15 Nov 2002; 21: 3161-3181https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1267

Stratified analysis in randomized trials with noncompliance.

Biometrics. September 2005; 61 (816-823+895)https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00339.x

Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: Alternative model specifications. Empirical Study.

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2002; 27 (Win): 385-409https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027004385

Inference for the complier-average causal effect for longitudinal data subject to noncompliance and missing data, with application to a job training assessment for the unemployed.

Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2001; 96: 1232-1244Mealli F Imbens GW Ferro S Biggeri A.

Analyzing a randomized trial on breast self-examination with noncompliance and missing outcomes.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England). Apr 2004; 5: 207-222

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif