Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research.

John Wiley & Sons, Eldridge SM Ashby D Feder GS Rudnicka AR Ukoumunne OC.

Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.

Clin Trials J Soc Clin Trials. 1: 80-90https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774504cn006rrEccles M Grimshaw J Campbell M Ramsay C.

Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies.

Qual Saf Health Care. 12: 47-52

Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research.

Stat Methods Med Res. 9: 81-94https://doi.org/10.1177/096228020000900202

Survey sampling.

John Wiley, New YorkDonner A Birkett N Buck C.

Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis.

Am J Epidemiol. 114: 906-914Whiting O Keefe QE Henke C Simborg DW.

Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments.

Med Care. 22: 1101-1114

Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.

Stat Med. 21: 2971-2980https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1301 ()Higgins JP Deeks JJ Altman DG

Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics.

()in: Higgins J Green S Cochrane Handb. Syst. Rev. Interv. Version 5. The Cochrane Collaboration, Donner A Piaggio G Villar J.

Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.

Stat Methods Med Res. 10: 325-338https://doi.org/10.1177/096228020101000502

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.

() The Cochrane Collaboration,

Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials.

Stat Med. 20: 3729-3740Ivers NM Taljaard M Dixon S Bennett C McRae A Taleban J et al.

Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8.

BMJ. 343 ()https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5886Campbell MK Fayers PM Grimshaw JM.

Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research.

Clin Trials. 2: 99-107https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774505cn071oaTurner RM Thompson SG Spiegelhalter DJ.

Prior distributions for the intracluster correlation coefficient, based on multiple previous estimates, and their application in cluster randomized trials.

Clin Trials. 2: 108-118https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774505cn072oaTurner RM Toby Prevost A Thompson SG

Allowing for imprecision of the intracluster correlation coefficient in the design of cluster randomized trials.

Stat Med. 23: 1195-1214https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1721

Bayesian methods for cluster randomized trials with continuous responses.

Stat Med. 20: 435-452Turner RM Omar RZ Thompson SG.

Bayesian methods of analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcome data.

Stat Med. 20: 453-472

The National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions.

Type 2 diabetes.

National Diabetes Audit 2010–2011 Report 1.

Care Processes and Treatment Targets. Presseau J Mackintosh J Hawthorne G Francis JJ Johnston M Grimshaw JM et al.

Cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based multiple behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals to improve their management of type 2 diabetes in primary care.

Implement Sci. 13: 65https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0754-5Shojania KG Ranji SR Shaw LK Charo LN Lai JC Ruskakoff RJ et al.

Closing the Quality Gap : A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies.

Volume 2 - Diabetes Mellitus Care. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;. Tricco AC Ivers NM Grimshaw JM Moher D Turner L Galipeau J et al.

Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lancet. 379: 2252-2261https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2

Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC).

EPOC Taxonomy. O'Connor PJ Desai J Solberg LI Reger LA Crain AL Asche SE et al.

Randomized trial of quality improvement intervention to improve diabetes care in primary care settings.

Diabetes Care. 28: 1890-1897Danko K Taljaard M Sullivan K Ivers N Grimshaw J.

How pervasive are unit of analysis errors in cluster randomized trials? A review of diabetes quality improvement RCTs.

Glob. Evid. Summit, Cape Town, South Africa. Ivers N Tricco AC Trikalinos TA Dahabreh IJ Danko KJ Moher D et al.

Seeing the forests and the trees–innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: a protocol.

Syst Rev. 3: 88https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-88Spiegelhalter D Abrams K Myles J.

Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation.

John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West SussexSwiger LA Harvey WR Everson DO Gregory KE.

The variance of intraclass correlation involving groups with one observation.

Biometrics. 20: 818https://doi.org/10.2307/2528131

Appendix B: The “Delta method.

12th ed. Progr. MARK a gentle Introd, Higgins JPT Thompson SG Spiegelhalter DJ.

A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.

J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 172: 137-159https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.xIvers N Tricco AC Trikalinos TA Dahabreh IJ Danko KJ Moher D et al.

Seeing the forests and the trees-innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: A protocol.

Syst Rev. 3https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-88Danko K Dahabreh I Trikalinos T Ivers N Grimshaw J.

Making sense of complex interventions: Application of hierarchical multivariate meta- regression to explore heterogeneity in diabetes quality improvement interventions International.

in: Conf. Heal. Policy Stat., Charleston, South CarolinaFrijling BD Lobo CM Hulscher MEJL Akkermans RP Braspenning JCC Prins A et al.

Multifaceted support to improve clinical decision making in diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial in general practice.

Diabet Med. 19: 836-842Vaccaro O Franzini L Miccoli R Cavalot F Ardigò D Boemi M et al.

Feasibility and effectiveness in clinical practice of a multifactorial intervention for the reduction of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: the 2-year interim analysis of the MIND.IT study: a cluster randomized trial.

Diabetes Care. 36: 2566-2572https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1781Frei A Senn O Chmiel C Reissner J Held U Rosemann T.

Implementation of the chronic care model in small medical practices improves cardiovascular risk but not glycemic control.

Diabetes Care. 37: 1039-1047https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1429Kinmonth AL Woodcock A Griffin S Spiegal N Campbell MJ.

Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.

BMJ. 317: 1202-1208Bebb C Kendrick D Coupland C Madeley R Stewart J Brown K et al.

A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a treatment algorithm for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Br J Gen Pract. 57: 136-143MacLean CD Gagnon M Callas P Littenberg B.

The Vermont Diabetes Information System: A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Population Based Decision Support System.

J Gen Intern Med. 24: 1303-1310https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1147-xSönnichsen AC Winkler H Flamm M Panisch S Kowatsch P Klima G et al.

The effectiveness of the Austrian disease management programme for type 2 diabetes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

BMC Fam Pract. 11: 86https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-86O'Connor PJ Sperl-Hillen JM Rush WA Johnson PE Amundson GH Asche SE et al.

Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial.

Ann Fam Med. 9: 12-21https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1196Shah BR Bhattacharyya O Yu CHY Mamdani MM Parsons JA Straus SE et al.

Effect of an Educational Toolkit on Quality of Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.

PLoS Med. 11e1001588https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001588Steyn K Lombard C Gwebushe N Fourie JM Everett-Murphy K Zwarenstein M et al.

Implementation of national guidelines, incorporated within structured diabetes and hypertension records at primary level care in Cape Town, South Africa: a randomised controlled trial.

Glob Health Action. 6: 20796https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.20796Blackberry ID Furler JS Best JD Chondros P Vale M Walker C et al.

Effectiveness of general practice based, practice nurse led telephone coaching on glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes: the Patient Engagement And Coaching for Health (PEACH) pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

BMJ. 347 ()https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5272Thompson DM Fernald DH Mold JW.

Intraclass correlation coefficients typical of cluster-randomized studies: estimates from the Robert Wood Johnson Prescription for Health projects.

Ann Fam Med. 10: 235-240https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1347Taljaard M Donner A Villar J Wojdyla D Velazco A Bataglia V et al.

Intracluster correlation coefficients from the 2005 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health: implications for implementation research.

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 22: 117-125https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00901.xCook JA Bruckner T MacLennan GS Seiler CM.

Clustering in surgical trials–database of intracluster correlations.

Trials. 13: 2https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-2Pals SL Beaty BL Posner SF Bull SS.

Estimates of intraclass correlation for variables related to behavioral HIV/STD prevention in a predominantly African American and Hispanic sample of young women.

Health Educ Behav. 36: 182-194https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198108327731Janjua NZ Khan MI Clemens JD.

Estimates of intraclass correlation coefficient and design effect for surveys and cluster randomized trials on injection use in Pakistan and developing countries.

Trop Med Int Health. 11: 1832-1840https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01736.xHade EM Murray DM Pennell ML Rhoda D Paskett ED Champion VL et al.

Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screening studies.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010: 97-103https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq011Frank B Fulton RL Goldie FC Hacke W Weimar C Lees KR.

Intracluster correlation coefficients and reliability of randomized multicenter stroke trials within VISTA.

Int J Stroke. 9: 602-606https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12123Lajos GJ Haddad SM Tedesco RP Passini Jr, R Dias TZ Nomura ML et al.

Intracluster correlation coefficients for the Brazilian Multicenter Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP): methodological and practical implications.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 14: 54https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-54Pagel C Prost A Lewycka S Das S Colbourn T Mahapatra R et al.

Intracluster correlation coefficients and coefficients of variation for perinatal outcomes from five cluster-randomised controlled trials in low and middle-income countries: results and methodological implications.

Trials. 12: 151https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-151Gulliford MC Adams G Ukoumunne OC Latinovic R Chinn S Campbell MJ.

Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data.

J Clin Epidemiol. 58: 246-251https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.012Adams G Gulliford MC Ukoumunne OC Eldridge S Chinn S Campbell MJ.

Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis.

J Clin Epidemiol. 57: 785-794https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013

What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines.

BMJ. 313: 93-96

Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: data from the MRC Trial of the Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community.

Control Clin Trials. 23: 409-421Rowe AK Lama M Onikpo F Deming MS.

Design effects and intraclass correlation coefficients from a health facility cluster survey in Benin.

Int J Qual Heal Care J Int Soc Qual Heal Care. 14: 521-523

Observed intra-cluster correlation coefficients in a cluster survey sample of patient encounters in general practice in Australia.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 4: 30https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-30Sedgwick JE Pearce AJ Gulliford MC.

Evaluation of equity in diabetes health care in relation to African and Caribbean ethnicity.

Ethn Health. 8: 121-133https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850303560

Relationship of health-related quality of life to symptom severity in diabetes mellitus: a study in Trinidad and Tobago.

J Clin Epidemiol. 52: 773-780Amorim LD Bangdiwala SI McMurray RG Creighton D Harrell J.

Intraclass correlations among physiologic measures in children and adolescents.

Nurs Res. 56: 355-360https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000289497.91918.94Parker DR Evangelou E Eaton CB.

Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART).

Contemp Clin Trials. 26: 260-267https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.002Elley CR Kerse N Chondros P Robinson E

Intraclass correlation coefficients from three cluster randomised controlled trials in primary and residential health care.

Aust N Z J Public Health. 29: 461-467Feder G Griffiths C Eldridge S Spence M.

Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial.

BMJ. 318: 1522-1526

Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in adults with diabetes in primary care practices: the Vermont Diabetes Information System field survey.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 6: 20https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-20Campbell M Grimshaw J Steen N.

Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. Changing Professional Practice in Europe Group (EU BIOMED II Concerted Action).

J Health Serv Res Policy. 5: 12-16https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960000500105

Health Serivces Research Unit. Database of intra-correlation coefficients (ICCs). Excel Sheet n.d. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/hsru/documents/iccs-web.xls (accessed August 8, 2017).

Geyer J Davis M Narayan T.

Intracluster Correlation Coefficients of Household Economic and Agricultural Outcomes in Mozambique.

Eval Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X16659834

Plummer M. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. 2003.

General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations.

J Comput Graph Stat. 7: 434-455https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787Trikalinos TA Dahabreh IJ Wallace BC Schmid CH Lau J.

Towards a Framework for Communicating Confidence in Methodological Recommendations for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Methods Research Report. (Prepared by Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC119-EF. 2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, RockvilleMD

Multiple imputation after 18+ years.

J Am Stat Assoc. 91: 473-489