Dental Education in the COVID-19 Era: Challenges, Solutions and Opportunities

3.1. Education

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major influence on dental education in every aspect and at every level, from application to admission all the way to graduation and licensing. After the implementation of the lockdown measures, the sudden halt in academic and clinical activities necessitated each dental college to promptly re-evaluate its capacities in multiple dimensions and creatively explore available options to determine the nature of curricular modifications that would be feasible and successful [18-20]. Then, prompt implementation and execution were required to ensure the uninterrupted remote delivery of curricular content [18, 19]. Naturally, faculty and students were required to swiftly adapt to the implemented changes, which in many cases meant a completely virtual dental curriculum [2, 11, 20, 21]. In order facilitate the implementation of creative and quick changes in the manner that was observed during the pandemic, it was necessary to have freedom from the usual constraints and regulations, which inevitably led to variability in curricular modifications among different colleges in the same country. In an attempt to maintain documentation for guidance, comparison, and evaluation purposes, some accreditation and educational governing bodies required dental colleges to submit standardized reports that comprehensively described the changes made to their curricular design and delivery [18, 11].

In most dental colleges, online instruction replaced any didactic classroom-based or “virtualizable” components of the curriculum using synchronous (live delivery) and asynchronous (on-demand) approaches [16, 19-23]. For that purpose, faculty utilized a variety of technological platforms with telecon- ferencing and file-sharing functionalities to facilitate the delivery of virtual lectures, conduction of group discussions and enhance student engagement [20, 23, 24].

Table 1. Common changes observed or implemented by dental colleges in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Domain Observed or Implemented Changes            Education Method of curriculum delivery -   • Didactic components Online delivery   • Practical components -     o If virtualizable Online delivery     o If not virtualizable Replaced by other teaching strategies that fulfill related learning outcomes; example: case-based group discussions, procedural videos   • Clinical components Replaced by other teaching strategies that fulfill related learning outcomes; example: case-based group discussions, procedural videos, teledentistry External rotations Cancelled Assessment -   • Method of delivery Online   • Tools used A variety of tools including multiple-choice questions, essays, virtual oral examinations, OSCE and video production   • Exam security Third-party proctoring, identity authentication and automated plagiarism detection   • Grading scheme Changed Licensure examinations Cancelled or rescheduled Graduation ceremonies Cancelled, rescheduled or moved online Meetings Conducted online Admission interviews Conducted online            Patient Care   • Elective care Rescheduled   • Urgent care Provided on campus or through teledentistry            Research   • Basic and clinical research Temporarily suspended   • COVID-19 research Increased   • Writing and publication Increased          Faculty development, retention and collaboration Faculty development activities -   • Method of delivery Online Faculty tenure and promotion Provided more time

It is essential to keep in mind the inequality of teaching and learning experiences that exists as a result of the variations in the quality and availability of the networks, software, and hardware utilized by faculty and students [16, 20]. In consideration of students with financial constraints who may not be able to cope with the prompt virtual transition, some institutions planned to deliver the online curricular content again through in-person classrooms following the resumption of on-campus academic activities [16]. Other institutions reduced the duration of daily virtual teaching schedules to minimize data usage [10].

Additionally, due to its sudden implementation, faculty and students with inadequate experience with these platforms were challenged by a steep learning curve [20, 23]. Thus, many institutions provided training sessions relevant to the platforms they intended to use in addition to technical support whenever required. [11, 16, 20, 25] Virtual attendance from home can also constitute a challenge for those living in different time zones or who are caring for younger children due to a lack of childcare options during the crisis. Special considerations were given to these disadvantaged members of the dental education community [23]. Students’ engagement in these virtual sessions delivered without in-person interaction was improved using a variety of interactive teaching styles that break the feeling of isolation and maximize the benefits gained from the sessions [25]. The faculty incorporated timestamped questions and provided meaningful feedback frequently during sessions. Students and faculty used discussion forums available within learning management systems to discuss clinical cases or provide updates and feedback [25]. Additionally, clarifying expectations to students and documenting those expectations in course descriptions, while possibly adding extra points for student participation in online teaching sessions, can enhance student performance. On the other hand, this may be unfair for those students who have limited access due to the technical, financial and social constraints described earlier. A wise and appropriate selection between synchronous and asynchronous teaching is also beneficial. Small group discussions with problem-based learning (PBL) and flipped classroom techniques, which require students to review online modules before participating in seminars, can be used to stimulate active discussion, aid in the comprehension of important concepts and build on critical thinking while also improving student engagement [11].

Despite the successful experience with online delivery of the didactic components of the curriculum, reproducing the same success with practical and clinical training remains the main challenge. The fidelity of live patient encounters and simulation-based training in laboratories is difficult to provide in virtual form for two primary reasons [11, 22]. First, with the currently available technology, competency in skill perfor- mance cannot be confirmed without direct physical super- vision. Second, there is a considerably high cost associated with task trainers (manikins, online virtual solutions, typodonts, etc.), so it would be difficult to provide them for everyone. Some of these training tools also require significant technical and logistic support that is difficult to provide for home use. Unfortunately, these practical and clinical activities requiring the demonstration of competencies, which were dramatically reduced in the modified curricular plans, occupy the bulk of the overall training requirements in the field of dentistry [19]. Some colleges resumed practical simulation-based training on campus while practicing social-distancing measures [11]. For the colleges that did not have that option, practical training on manikins was very difficult to deliver virtually due to time, human resource, and technology constraints described earlier. Virtual reality systems and haptic technology, even when available, are not currently portable, do not cover all areas of dentistry and are very expensive, which prevent their use for such purposes [11, 26]. Regardless, positive experiences have been documented with other practical courses, such as oral pathology education, where the alternative online teaching method has been reported to be superior to the conventional microscopic approach [26]. This highlights the importance of keeping an open mind and avoiding exclusivity when making strategic decisions about course delivery methods in crisis times, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual analysis and classification of all courses in the curriculum should be performed based on their virtualization feasibility.

Some dental colleges modified their assessment plans or extended program end dates to provide time for additional hands-on experience. Other institutions reduced their clinical graduation requirements [18, 26]. In countries such as the United States and Canada, dental colleges are obliged to follow strict regulations that guide the setting of clinical requirements for their students and residents to ensure the quality of the provided dental education. Under the current circumstances, the challenge lies in ensuring adequate clinical exposure to meet the required standards [23].

There is a common agreement that greater efforts should be made to compensate for lost clinical time and allow students to receive adequate hands-on training before graduation [19]. Dental colleges have been striving to offer alternatives that may reduce the negative impact of losing hands-on training in laboratories and clinical encounters during the lockdown while at the same time ensuring the safety of everyone involved. Procedural videos and case-based discussions using clinically based scenarios are important tools employed for this purpose [10, 16, 19, 22, 26]. Teledentistry is also an important tool that has been utilized by many colleges, when appropriate, to compensate for lost clinical time and canceled external rotations [16, 23].

Despite all the efforts made to compensate for lost clinical time and experience, graduating dental students and residents are ultimately the most negatively affected. For many of them, essential graduation requirements were unmet at the time of the lockdown. In addition, they may be deprived of opportunities to participate in important externships outside their home institutions before graduation due to mandated national infection control measures [2]. Their graduation may be delayed due to unfulfilled clinical requirements, or alter- natively, they may graduate without full clinical experience [7]. Because of this, the responsibility may fall on dental colleges to certify the competency of graduating dental students and residents [11].

Dental colleges have creatively used online assessment during the pandemic with a variety of tools, including multiple-choice questions, essays, virtual oral examinations, and video production [16, 18, 22]. To increase the security of online assessment tools, third-party proctoring, identity authentication and automated plagiarism detection have been utilized by many institutions. [11, 27] Despite its questionable validity, online assessment is a practical alternative to face-to-face exams [19]. The online assessment is cost-effective and facilitates student attendance from various geographic locations [27]. That being said, many licensure examination agencies are rescheduling or cancelling examinations [11, 23]. Several licensing exami- nations cannot be conducted online because they require the presence of a live patient, which would be a risk to patient and student safety [23]. One of the timely strategies currently under consideration is restructuring the format of licensure and competency examinations. Licensure examinations are required to assess the skills, knowledge, aptitude, and behavior needed to be a competent dentist [11]. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) along with simulation-based practical assessments could be a valid alternative in many situations, and resources could be shared among colleges to create these exams [11, 19, 23, 28]. Additionally, novel forms of competency assessment with special emphases on diagnostic, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning skills are being considered. Additionally, a more longitudinal and global assessment of student progress toward overall competence is being considered over traditional single-point assessment [28].

In regard to admission applications for new students, the digital platforms that are usually used for applications remain functional. However, to minimize the risk of disease transmission, in-person interviews may transition to virtual interviews. Additionally, grading schemes that have been changed in many dental colleges during the past semester may pose a problem for graduating students when their applications are being considered for residency programs [18]. Incoming class sizes may be reduced, potential applicants might consider postponing their dental training, and the commencement dates of many programs remain uncertain, pending the national status of the disease [18, 23].

While it is fair to assume that student clinics should be resumed following issued directives from governing bodies, it is critical to realize the economic catastrophe that this pandemic has generated and the likely lag in patient flow following the resumption of clinical activity [8, 26]. Putting the financial factor aside, the patient flow will also be affected by modifications to the clinical setup and time schedules that were made to comply with social-distancing measures in the transitional period following the end of the pandemic, and this will affect overall capacity and the turnover rate [16, 23]. It is therefore imperative that dental colleges continue to create and update contingency plans to account for the medium- and long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental education [26]. It is expected that aspects of this modified curriculum may need to persist in making up for the possible reduction in patient flow after the pandemic ends [8]. Contingency plans should also address a possible second COVID-19 wave that may require additional periods of a lockdown or social distancing [28].

Finally, planning how and when dental colleges should return to “normal” and establishing a new routine are considerable challenges that require extensive discussion and elaboration of policies and protocols [16]. Considering that different countries have different experiences and are at different stages of the COVID-19 crisis, it would be very interesting to observe the variety of plans that emerge from different colleges around the world and the manner in which they will be executed [16]. Formulating these strategic and contingency plans may require the formation of a committee within the dental college to carry out this daunting task [16].

The plan should consider epidemiological trends, governmental policies, safety and infection control measures recommended by governing bodies; the availability of human resources; access to COVID-19 testing and adequate personal protective equipment (PPE); modifications to the timetables and physical layout of dental clinics; and preclinical laboratories that allow their operation at a reduced capacity to accommodate small groups at a time in compliance with recommended social distancing [16, 23]. The duration of clinical sessions may need to be reduced to accommodate additional group turnover during the day and compensate for the time needed to perform adequate infection control between groups. Patient reception and waiting areas may need to be redesigned to reduce capacity and ensure social distancing [16]. A pre-entry checkpoint for all patients, faculty, staff and students before entering the clinic is required. At these checkpoints, the temperature is checked, identification, travel and COVID-19 history are verified, and hand sanitizer is provided [16]. It is also recommended that all patients use a hydrogen peroxide mouthwash before treatment [16]. The use of rubber dams and high-volume suction also needs to be reinforced, as they can minimize aerosol production. [16, 11]

3.2. Patient Care

Due to the risk of disease transmission in the dental setting, teaching clinics within dental colleges have been suspended. Student practice has been limited to participation in teledentistry consultations as part of the remote learning experience in some colleges [23]. Most dental colleges have offered urgent dental care provided exclusively by faculty and advanced dental education residents [23]. However, even emergency treatments are limited in many colleges to non-aerosol-generating procedures as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and dental governing bodies [23].

Patients of low socioeconomic status and those without dental insurance rely heavily on the dental care provided at dental colleges and are therefore the group most affected by the disruption of regular dental care during the pandemic. [18] Additionally, with the limitations that are implemented on dental practices in general and the suspension of the dental care that was provided by students in dental colleges, it is expected that delayed diagnoses of diseases with significant clinical impact, such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), will occur. This will lead to diagnoses in advanced clinical stages, increasing related mortality and morbidity [28].

The transitional period that will follow the end of the pandemic is a gray area that puts dental colleges in a challenging position. As mentioned earlier, the decision to fully operate dental clinics within colleges is complex and multifaceted [23]. Meanwhile, teledentistry consultations have been utilized during the pandemic to provide patient care while minimizing direct patient contact and in-person appointments. Such consultations also serve to compensate for students’ canceled external rotations and lack of clinical exposure. Teledentistry can be used in four main ways: consultation, diagnosis, triaging and monitoring [28, 29]. Although it lacks the essential tactile assessment, teledentistry has proven to be very beneficial for ensuring continuity of patient care, prioritizing patients’ needs and potentially alleviating anxiety caused by significant delays in scheduling office visits due to the pandemic [17]. Teledentistry can also reduce the use of PPE and other highly valuable clinical resources during the pandemic [18]. Teledentistry, however, is still struggling with acceptance by both dentists and patients [23, 29].

In addition to the needed virtual infrastructure, which may or may not be adequate, and the current incompatibility with healthcare systems, dentists who are used to conventional in-person patient care may find teledentistry complex, as it requires that they learn new skills, especially if they are technologically challenged. They may also be concerned about making inaccurate diagnoses and the financial burden of the process and its setup. For patients, the lack of in-person communication may lead to apprehension about the possible inadequacy of proper communication of their problems to their dentists [20, 29].

To overcome this challenge, adequate training should be provided to dentists to familiarize them with the details of this technology. Looking ahead, it may be beneficial to routinely teach teledentistry within dental curricula as a solution for the prevention of disease transmission, particularly in times of crisis. In addition, adequate funding and integration of teledentistry within existing healthcare systems will be required [29]. For patients, the acceptability of teledentistry will increase in parallel with the acceptability of telemedicine in general, which is on the rise [29].

3.6. Psychological Well-Being of Students, Faculty and Patients

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected members of the dental education community on both professional and personal levels. Dental colleges are facing a significant increase in anxiety among students, faculty, staff and patients [11, 23] and therefore must plan strategies to keep them motivated and reduce their anxiety [26].

There is a great deal of anxiety among students who must adjust to modified curricula while being fearful for their safety and concerned about their academic performance, financial debt, and a potential recession’s impact on the job market [11, 23, 26]. Guidance and emotional support through counseling sessions in addition to open communication and readily available up-to-date information can help alleviate student anxiety. [11, 14, 16, 26] Attendance and assessment policies should also be modified to reduce anxiety among students [11]. Despite all efforts to contain the negative impact of the pandemic, the student dropout rate is expected to increase. This aspect must also be carefully considered by institutions [26].

Additionally, faculty have been under significant pressure as they attempt to balance the need to convert quickly to unfamiliar new methods of teaching and assessment, comply with dynamic policies set by governing bodies, and at the same time, keep students engaged and motivated [11, 26]. With the new nature of working from home, faculty may find it difficult to set clear boundaries between their personal and professional schedules [3]. For that reason, faculty should reprioritize goals, obtain training on online teaching and receive clear policies and protocols with regard to expectations and responsibilities [3]. Finally, with the pandemic negatively affecting research productivity, colleges should be tolerant with regard to promotion and tenure decisions for faculty [11].

Patients should be able to access information on the school website and be reassured regarding the measures taken by dental colleges to ensure their safety during dental appointments [11]. They can also be offered alternative patient care through teledentistry whenever appropriate. This will help reduce their anxiety regarding significant delays in clinical appointments [17].

While there is no question that this unique journey will impact our profession in significant ways even in the long run, it has allowed us to support each other, give and receive compassion and remember our similarities and common goals [14, 26]. While we may be a long way from the finish line of this pandemic, we must utilize this time to make intentional choices about how we wish to emerge from it as individuals, institutions and societies [14].

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif