Albury, C., Hall, A., Syed, A., Ziebland, S., Stokoe, E., Roberts, N., Webb, H., Aveyard, P. (2019). Communication practices for delivering health behaviour change conversations in primary care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMC Family Practice, 20(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0992-x
Google Scholar Benwell, B., Rhys, C. S. (2018). Negotiating relevance in pre-operative assessments. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.034
Google Scholar Billig, M., Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between. Discourse & Society, 10, 543.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Bolden, G. B. (2015). Transcribing as research: “Manual” transcription and conversation analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058603
Google Scholar Bracher, M., Stewart, S., Reidy, C., Allen, C., Townsend, K., Brindle, L. (2020). Partner involvement in treatment-related decision making in triadic clinical consultations – A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.031
Google Scholar Clift, R. (2016). Conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref Drew, P. (2008). Conversation analysis. In Smith, J. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 133–159). SAGE.
Google Scholar Drew, P., Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Finlay, W. M. L., Walton, C., Antaki, C. (2011). Giving feedback to care staff about offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis (pp. 161–183). Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref Fleischer, S., Berg, A., Zimmermann, M., Wüste, K., Behrens, J. (2009). Nurse-patient interaction and communication: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Health, 17(5), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-008-0238-1
Google Scholar Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar Georgopoulou, S., Prothero, L., D’Cruz, D. P. (2018). Physician–patient communication in rheumatology: A systematic review. Rheumatology International, 38(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4016-2
Google Scholar Gerteis, M., Edgman-Levitan, S., Daley, J., Delbanco, T. L. (1993). Through the patients’ eyes: Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
Google Scholar Goodwin, C., Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
Google Scholar Halpin, S. N., Konomos, M. (2020). An iterative formative evaluation of medical education for multiple myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplant. Journal of Cancer Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01882-3
Google Scholar Halpin, S. N., Konomos, M., Jowers, I. (2021). Interrupted identities: Autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma. Journal of Patient Experience, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373521998864
Google Scholar Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref Hepburn, A., Bolden, G. B. (2017). Transcribing for social research. SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In Fitch, K. L., Sanders, R. E. (Eds.), Language and social interaction (pp. 103–144). Routledge.
Google Scholar Heritage, J. (2013). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar Heritage, J., Clayman, S. (2011). Talk in action: Interactions (Vol. 44). John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar Heritage, J., Maynard, D. W. (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (Vol. 20). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D. (2011). ‘Some’ versus. In Antaki, C. (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis (pp. 15–31). Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref Heritage, J., Sorjonen, M. L. (2018). Between turn and sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages (Vol. 31). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar | Crossref Iversen, C., Broström, A., Ulander, M. (2017). Balancing task focus and relationship building: asking sleepy patients about traffic risk in treatment initiation consultations. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(4), 895–903.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 125, 13–34.
Google Scholar | Crossref Jones, A. (2003). Nurses talking to patients: Exploring conversation analysis as a means of researching nurse–patient communication. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(6), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00037-3
Google Scholar Landsberger, H. A. (1958). Hawthorne revisited: Management and the worker, its critics, and developments in human relations in industry. Cornell University.
Google Scholar Larsen, T. (2017). Nurses’ instruction of patients in the use of INR-monitors for self-management of cardio-vascular conditions: Missed instructional opportunities. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(4), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.001
Google Scholar Lester, J. N., O’Reilly, M. (2018). Applied conversation analysis: Social interaction in institutional settings. SAGE.
Google Scholar Mayor, E., Bietti, L. (2017). Ethnomethodological studies of nurse-patient and nurse-relative interactions: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 70, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.015
Google Scholar Mead, N., Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine, 51(7), 1087–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8
Google Scholar Murad, M. S., Chatterley, T., Guirguis, L. M. (2014). A meta-narrative review of recorded patient–pharmacist interactions: Exploring biomedical or patient-centered communication? Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.03.002
Google Scholar Peterson, E. B., Ostroff, J. S., DuHamel, K. N., D’Agostino, T. A., Hernandez, M., Canzona, M. R., Bylund, C. L. (2016). Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 93, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034
Google Scholar Redelmeier, D. A., Katz, J., Kahneman, D. (2003). Memories of colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Pain, 104(1–2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00003-4
Google Scholar Riviere, M., Dufoort, H., Van Hecke, A., Vandecasteele, T., Beeckman, D., Verhaeghe, S. (2019). Core elements of the interpersonal care relationship between nurses and older patients without cognitive impairment during their stay at the hospital: A mixed-methods systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 92, 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.004
Google Scholar Rodin, G., Mackay, J. A., Zimmermann, C., Mayer, C., Howell, D., Katz, M., Sussman, J., Brouwers, M. (2009). Clinician-patient communication: A systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0601-y
Google Scholar Roter, D., Hall, J. A. (2006). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: Improving communication in medical visits. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Google Scholar Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In Heritage, J., Atkinson, J. M. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 2–27). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
Google Scholar | Crossref Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Analyzing discourse (pp. 71–93). Georgetown University Press.
Google Scholar Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745
Google Scholar Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107
Google Scholar Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis as research methodology. In Richards, K., Seedhouse, P. (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 251–266). Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref Sidnell, J., Stivers, T. (Eds.) (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar Stortenbeker, I., Stommel, W., van Dulmen, S., Lucassen, P., Das, E., Olde Hartman, T. (2020). Linguistic and interactional aspects that characterize consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 132, 109994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109994
Google Scholar Ten Have, P . (2007). Doing conversation analysis. SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref Tiitinen, S., Ruusuvuori, J. (2014). Using formulations and gaze to encourage parents to talk about their and their children’s health and well-being. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.871805
Google Scholar Troy, E., Doltani, D., Harmon, D. (2019). The role of a companion attending consultations with the patient. A systematic review. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 1971, 188(3), 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1920-0
Google Scholar Whitaker, E. M., Atkinson, P. (2019). Authenticity and the interview: A positive response to a radical critique. Qualitative Research, 19(6), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816885
Google Scholar