The transcription factor activator protein 2 (TFAP2) family consists of five genes TFAP2 A–E that are closely linked to the regulation of neural crest cells (NCCs).1–5 Transcriptional regulation is carried out by homodimerisation or heterodimerisation of a TFAP2 protein member with its paralogs or various other transcription factors.5–7 Interestingly, the TFAP2 paralogs are conserved on protein level, with the highest sequence similarity in the C-terminal region (70%–80%).8
TFAP2E is known to interact in the downstream gene regulatory network of NCC specifiers that are induced by the neural plate border specifiers PAX3 and ZIC1.9 As shown for TFAP2A/C and TFAP2A/B, heterodimerisation of TFAP2 paralogs facilitate chromatin access of neural plate border specifiers PAX3, GATA1/3, ZIC1 as well as neural crest specifiers SOX10, SOXD and FOXD3.5–7 Additionally, TFAP2-activated genes show an enrichment of SOXE-binding and MITF-binding sites.10 Moreover, TFAP2E has been shown to perturb DKK4 expression and consequently perturb WNT/ß-catenin signalling.6 In Xenopus, tfap2e was identified as a regulator of NCC specifiers sox10 and snail2 at the neurulation stage, and knockdown (KD) of Tfap2e in Xenopus resulted in expansion of the neural plate and loss of migratory NCCs.9 11 12
Previous expression studies in mice and Xenopus detected Tfap2e/tfap2e in the midbrain, hindbrain and rostral region of the spinal cord,8 11 12 in cranial NCCs migrating to the pharyngeal arches as well as in neural crest progenitor cells and Rohon-Beard sensory neurons (RBSNs).13 In zebrafish larvae (zfl), tfap2e expression was detected in the central nervous system (CNS) and NCCs including the presumed olfactory placode, medial telencephalon, hindbrain and melanocytes from 1 day postfertilisation (dpf) onwards.14
Dysregulation of neural plate border specification, as well as subsequent neural crest specification and migration, has been demonstrated to contribute to various CNS defects, neural tube defects15 and neurocristopathies, such as PCWH syndrome (MIM: 609136).16 However, up until now, TFAP2E has not been linked to any human congenital anomalies.
In the present study, we identified five unrelated families with novel or ultra-rare heterozygous variants in TFAP2E presenting with CNS, orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies. Depletion of Tfap2e in zfl resembled the human phenotypical spectrum in early zf morphant stages.
MethodsHuman subjects and exome sequencingIndividual D-II:1 was part of an exome sequencing (ES) cohort of 208 unsolved cases with structural brain anomalies who underwent termination of pregnancy. Trio-ES was performed in family D as described previously.17 Candidate variants were filtered for novel or ultra-rare variants (Allele count: 1 or minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.0001) in Genome Aggregation Database gnomAD V.2.1.1 and an inhouse exome database.17 Following the pregnancy with D-II:4, ES of this individual was performed.
Individuals A-II:1, B-III:1, C-II:1 and E-II:1 were part of a database of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) who underwent clinical ES.18 In these individuals no pathogenic variant in an established disease gene was found on clinical evaluation and families were subjected to scientific evaluation. Candidate variants were filtered for novel or ultra-rare variants (MAF<0.0001) in gnomAD V.2.1.1. From all identified candidate variants, the TFAP2E variants were considered as potentially disease-causing and no other plausible candidate gene was shared between the affected individuals. For family B, segregation was performed by PCR and Sanger sequencing. For individuals A-II:1, C-II:1 and E-II:1 no parental DNA was available for segregation.
In order to look for copy number variations (CNVs) harbouring the TFAP2E locus, we reviewed entries in the Decipher database (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/), Baylor Genetics clinical chromosomal microarray database and conducted literature research for CNVs encompassing TFAP2E in 1p34.3 (online supplemental data 3 and 4 and online supplemental table 2).
Computational 3D modelling of protein structureHuman TFAP2E variant mapping, 3D structure prediction and structural comparison were performed using the RaptorX web server (http://raptorx.uchicago.edu/ContactMap/) and Chimaera software V. 1.14 (online supplemental data 5 and 6).19 We further used the ConSurf server to analyse conservation based on sequence analysis of TFAP2E homologues using default parameters.20
In silico prediction of missense variants in TFAP2EWe used publicly available variant annotation tools for functional prediction of missense variant alleles, including Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) GRCh38-v1.6, Polymorphism-Phenotyping V.2, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant, EnsembleRegulatoryFeature21–24 and MetaDome V.1.0.125 on the transcript ENST00000373235.3.
Zebrafish husbandry and embryo maintenanceZebrafish were raised and maintained according to national law and recommendations by Westerfield.26 Zfl of wild type (wt) AB/TL strain, transgenic Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) (ZDB-FISH-1 50 901–25608) and Tg(sox10:mRFP) (ZDB-FISH-1 50 901–4058) were obtained by natural spawning and raised at 28°C on a 14-hour light and 10-hour dark cycle.
In vivo morpholino oligonucleotide and mRNA microinjectionsKD of Tfap2e (ENSDART00000190005.1) was performed using specific morpholino (MO) oligonucleotides (GeneTools). We used one translation blocking (TB) and one splice blocking (e3i3) MO that have been established previously in a model for melanophore migration.13 In one-cell to two-cell embryos, we injected 3 ng of TB MO (5′-GCTGGAGTAGGAGTGGACTAACATC-3′; ZDB-MRPHLNO-1 01 013–3), 5 ng of e3i3 MO (5′-CACATGCAGACTCTCACCTTTCTTG-3′; ZDB-MRPHLNO-1 01 013–2) or 5 ng of control (Ctrl) MO (5'-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3') into the yolk of the embryos. A pCMV-Sport6.1-based vector for human TFAP2E (ENST00000373235.4) as well as a pCMV-Sport6.1-based vector with the zebrafish orthologue tfap2e (ENSDART00000190005.1) were used for mRNA transcription followed by polyA-Tailing. For mRNA rescue experiments, we co-injected human TFAP2E mRNA in different amounts (between 10 pg and 250 pg) or 150 pg of MO-resistant zebrafish tfap2e mRNA together with Ctrl MO, TB MO or e3i3 MO. For a detailed list of reagents see online supplemental data 8.
To confirm the efficacy of MO KD, we performed western blot using a zebrafish-specific antibody detecting the C-terminal end of Tfap2e between aminoacids (aa) 303 µg and 330. 50 µg of zfl protein lysat was used per sample. Band density quantification was performed using Fiji ImageJ, normalised to housekeeping control Gapdh and finally adjusted to average blot intensities as previously described.27
Efficacy of e3i3 MO KD in zfl, was confirmed by rt-PCR using previously described methods.28 We used a pair of intron-spanning primers (forward, 5′-CACCACGGCCTGGATGATATT-3′; reverse, 5′-AGGACTCCTCCAAGCAGCGA-3′) to amplify tfap2e exon 2–exon 4, confirming the precise exclusion of exon 3, which leads to a frameshift and subsequently a premature stop codon (online supplemental data 7).
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tfap2e knockout in zebrafishF0 tfap2e knockout (KO) zfl were generated by injection of a mix of four sgRNAs binding to exon 4 of tfap2e. Here, an insertion of 13 base pairs together with a deletion of 35 base pairs was confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing. The mutation is predicted to lead to a premature stop codon at position aa 199. F0 tfap2e+/- KOCRISPR zfl were bred with healthy wt zfl in F1 and F2 generation, and then outcrossed with transgenic Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) fish (ZDB-FISH-1 50 901–25608). For phenotypical evaluation, these heterozygous tfap2e+/- zfl were incrossed to generate tfap2e-/- KOCRISPR zfl, tfap2e+/- zfl and wt littermate control zfl. Genotyping of single embryos was performed by PCR amplification of the mutated region in exon 4 and subsequent allele-specific double digestion (online supplemental data 14).
Fluorescence in vivo imaging and CNS/NC phenotype evaluationZfl were treated against pigmentation with 0.003% phenylthiourea from 1 dpf onwards. Phenotype evaluation was performed from 2 dpf to 5 dpf daily using a Zeiss Stemi 508 brightfield microscope. For statistical analysis, we compared the relative amount of unaffected zfl at 3 dpf in relation to the cumulative number of unaffected, affected and dead zfl until 3 dpf. A comparable amount of zfl (n) were used in each group for every independent experiment (N), as indicated in the respective graphs.
For detailed evaluation of the CNS phenotype, we in vivo imaged the zebrafish brain and spinal cord in Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP)fluorescent reporter fish. To investigate the microencephaly phenotype, z-stack images were acquired, and brain volume was measured in a 3D model. Hydrocephalus was investigated by measuring the cleft between the forebrain hemispheres and normalised to the brain size in either the 3D model or in fluorescent whole mount brain images of KOCRISPR zfl. Furthermore, we analysed the brain ventricles following in vivo microinjections of 1.7 nl of 20 µM sulforhodamine 101 into the diencephalic ventricle of Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) zfl at 2 dpf.
For evaluation of the neural crest phenotype, we manually counted RBSN, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons and outgrowing central and peripheral projecting axons of the spinal cord over a length of 500 µm. Alcian blue cartilage staining was performed with zfl at 3 dpf using previously described methods to visualise the cartilage of craniofacial structures.29 Additionally, we evaluated NCC distribution in Tg(sox10:mRFP) zf outcrossed with wt AB/TL strain by fluorescence intensity analysis using Fiji/ImageJ (online supplemental data 9 and 14).
StatisticsTwo-tailed Student’s t-test, one-way or two-way analysis of variance test with Tukey’s multiple comparison and SEM were used for the respective analysis of treated zfl and controls. Data were first examined for normality using D’Agostino-Pearson and Shapiro-Wilk normalisation tests. Analysis of survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Mantel-Cox test. For all analyses, GraphPad Prism V.9.0.0 was used.
ResultsFive families with novel or ultra-rare missense variants in TFAP2E show combined CNS, orofacial and maxillofacial anomaliesFollowing the identification of our index case with a de novo TFAP2E variant, we identified four additional families through personal communications with novel or ultra-rare missense variant alleles in TFAP2E, one of which was a multiplex family. In total we identified seven individuals from five families with novel or ultra-rare missense variants in TFAP2E. Four individuals had hydrocephalus (4/7), four had other CNS anomalies (4/7), two NDDs (2/5), and six had orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies (6/7) (table 1). The latter encompassed retrognathia/micrognathia (3/7) or cleft lip and palate (4/7). Detailed clinical reports and genetic data can be found in the online supplemental data 1 and 2.
Table 1Phenotype data of individuals with heterozygous missense variants in TFAP2E
Hydrocephalus was observed in four individuals: Individuals A-II:1 and E-II:1 developed secondary hydrocephalus as a result of Chiari II malformation (A-II:1) or alobar holoprosencephaly (E-II:1). Individual B-III:1 from family B presented with communicating external hydrocephalus without signs of occlusion. Similarly, individual D-II:1 presented prenatal with communicating external hydrocephalus without signs of occlusion.
CNS anomalies were observed in four individuals: Individual A-II:1 presented with Chiari II malformation, agenesis of the corpus callosum and myelomeningocele. Individual C-II:1 presented with a thalamic lesion of uncertain origin. Individual D-II:1 presented with microlissencephaly, hypoplastic cerebellum, hypoplastic basal ganglia and thinned brain stem. Individual E-II:1 presented with alobar holoprosencephaly.
Orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies were observed in six individuals: Individuals A-II:1, B-III:1 and D-II:1 presented with retrognathia/micrognathia. Of note, three individuals of the multiplex family B presented with cleft lip and palate (B-I:2, B-II:4, B-III:1), as well as individual E-II:1.
NDDs were observed in two individuals: Individual A-II:1 presented with intellectual disability and hypotonia, individual C-II:1 presented with intellectual disability and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. NDD could not be assessed in two individuals since this was not possible in the prenatal situation nor in the deceased neonate.
In the multiplex family B the novel TFAP2E variant c.337C>A was identified in individual B-III:1 using ES. The c.337C>A variant segregated in the affected family members B-I:2, B-II:4 and B-III:1 over three generations. However, the mother (B-II:1) did not show congenital CNS, orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies, but she had chronic migraine and an anxiety disorder. Moreover, a maternal aunt (B-II:3) and a maternal half-uncle (B-II:5) (related to the maternal grandfather) presented with intellectual disability, but their DNA was not available for segregation analysis (figure 1A, table 1, online supplemental data 1).
Figure 1Clinical and molecular data of families with heterozygous transcription factor activator protein 2 (TFAP2E) missense variants. (A) Family pedigrees of individuals with heterozygous variants in TFAP2E and respective ConSurf conservation analysis for base pair (upper row) and amino acid (aa) conservation (lower row). Affected individuals are indicated with different shapes for each phenotype according to the legend. Arrowheads indicate the respective variant position. Purple/red colour indicates high conservation of the respective residue. Note the multiplex family B with overlapping orofacial and maxillofacial and neurodevelopmental phenotype (table 1, online supplemental data 1) and the de novo variant in the female individual D-II:1. The arrows indicate probands. Filled shapes reflect affected status. (B–D) Fetal brain MRI of D-II:1 (upper panel) compared with that of a healthy subject with similar gestational age as reference (lower panel). Besides the obvious microcephaly, note the reduced sulcation with smooth brain surface characteristic of lissencephaly (B, C, yellow arrowheads). Furthermore, an overall abnormal signal intensity of subcortical white matter as well as hypotrophy of basal ganglia is evident (C, yellow solid arrow). The suspected cerebellar hypoplasia was seen in the axial plane (D, yellow hollow arrow). (B) Axial T2 TSE (turbo spin echo), (C) coronal SSFP (steady-state free precession), (D) axial SSFP. (E) Ultrasound imaging of fetus D-II:1 at gestational week 30+4 shows severe retrognathia (white arrow). (F) Computational 3D protein modelling of TFAP2E showing the native prediction (green) and the variant prediction of B-III:1 (red). The variant site is marked by the respective (green/red) arrow. The missense variant changes the polarity of the aa residue, leading to conformation changes of the neighbouring aa. This completely changes the 3D structure of the affected transactivation domain. (G) Linearised visualisation of the TFAP2E protein and lollipop chart indicating the localisation of the individuals’ aa variants, which are colour-coded according to the family pedigrees in A. The identically colour-coded double-headed arrows below indicate the multiple positions of the variants’ structural effects predicted by our protein modelling data. Lower panel: Metadome Protein Tolerance Landscape indicating the residues with general intolerance to structural variations (orange–red colour indicates high intolerance). Note that for some variants a secondary effect to a neighbouring position and not the variant location itself are in a region of strong intolerance. That is true for p.Ala8Asp (A-II:1), p.Pro113Thr (B-III:1) and p.Leu228Phe (D-II:1) (online supplemental table 1). CNS, central nervous system; DBD, DNA-binding domain; DiD, dimerisation domain; NDD neurodevelopmental disorder; TD transactivation domain.
In family D, Trio-ES revealed a novel de novo TFAP2E variant (c.682C>T) (figure 1B–E, table 1). Notably, the parents of D-II:1 had in a later pregnancy a fetus (D-II:4) with cerebellar hypoplasia and retrognathia only (online supplemental data 2). On ES, the TFAP2E variant c.682C>T was not found in D-II:4. Pathogenic variants in known disease genes could be ruled out in the two fetuses (online supplemental data 1), they shared no other plausible candidate variant and we did not identify an independent genetic factor in individual D-II:4.
Missense variants in TFAP2E disrupt neighbouring functional domainsIn seven individuals from five families with a combined CNS/orofacial and maxillofacial phenotype, we identified novel or ultra-rare heterozygous TFAP2E missense variant alleles (figure 1A). Four out of five (4/5) variant alleles were predicted to be damaging with a CADD Score above 23 (table 2).
Table 2Molecular data of TFAP2E variant alleles
All investigated variants map to highly conserved residues at the base pair level (figure 1A), including three variants c.23C>A (family A), c.337C>A (family B) and c.386G>A (family C) residing in a predicted internal promoter region of the TFAP2E coding region, according to EnsembleRegulatoryFeature.23
The protein sequence of human TFAP2E (Q6VUC0) and mouse TFAP2E (Q6VUP9) show 93% similarity, allowing us to map the previously described murine functional domains to human TFAP2E (figure 1G upper panel, online supplemental data 10). Next, we combined our computational 3D protein modelling data with the MetaDome Tolerance Landscape, which evaluates the tolerance to structural variation of the respective aa residues. This approach revealed intolerance for modification of the secondary structure of the variant residues p.Arg129His (family C) and p.Gly312Ser (family E). Of note, even though the not conserved residues p.Ala8Asp (family A), p.Pro113Thr (family B) and the conserved residue p.Leu228Phe (family D) are rated as (highly) tolerant to structural variation, our 3D model predicts distortion of structurally neighbouring regions to be (highly) intolerant to changes (online supplemental table 1, figure 1G, online supplemental data 5 and 6). For instance, the variant p.Pro113Thr (family B) leads to a change in polarity and might possibly alter structure and activity of the neighbouring transactivation domain (p.50, p.96–99) (figure 1F,G).
Expression profile of tfap2e and establishment of zfl models with different tfap2e gene dosageWe initiated functional studies in zebrafish given an aa sequence similarity of 77% comparing human TFAP2E to zebrafish Tfap2e (Q6P0E7) (online supplemental data 10). Protein quantification of Tfap2e in whole zfl lysates showed a dynamic and accurate regulation of protein expression levels especially from 2 dpf to 3 dpf (figure 2A,B, online supplemental data 11). In a next step, we performed MO-based KD of Tfap2e.14 We were able to confirm KD efficacy of Tfap2e in morphants through western blot in which we observed nearly complete depletion of the Tfap2e protein at 3 dpf (figure 2A, upper panel, figure 1B). KD with the e3i3 MO was proven by rt-PCR (figure 2C, online supplemental data 7). In a parallel approach, a tfap2e KOCRISPR zebrafish line was generated.
Figure 2Tfap2e morpholino KD model in zfl. (A–B) Chemiluminescence bands and box plot graph of western blots of zfl on Tfap2e morpholino (MO) KD and controls from 1–4 days post fertilisation (dpf). Each dot on the box plot graph represents an independent experiment with 50 µg zfl protein of an independent injection. Band intensities were plotted on a logarithmic scale. Note the increasing genuine Tfap2e expression between 2 dpf and 3 dpf and the significantly suppressed expression on TB and e3i3 MO KD at 3 dpf. The housekeeping control Gapdh shows a consistent expression over all timepoints. The uncropped western blot membrane pictures are provided in online supplemental data 11. (C) Agarose gel electrophoresis after rt-PCR on tfap2e at 3 dpf. Tfap2e KD with e3i3 MO leads to an alternative, 50 bp shorter transcript (arrow) with precise exclusion of exon 3. This was further confirmed by Sanger sequencing (online supplemental data 7). (D–E) Representative brightfield microscopy images of zfl and box plot graph on the rate of unaffected zfl on Tfap2e KD. Each dot in the box plot graph indicates an independent injection experiment. Wild type (wt) strain zfl on tfap2e MO KD at 3 dpf present with microcephaly, scoliosis and hypopigmentation. The KD results in a significant reduction of phenotypically unaffected zfl. Co-injection of wt human RNA or zebrafish RNA (zfRNA) in morphants does not rescue the phenotype. Moreover, overexpression of TFAP2E by wt TFAP2E human polyA mRNA (hRNA) injection into Ctrl MO zfl leads to expression of the morphant phenotype in some of these controls. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of tfap2e MO KD zfl. Both morphants show a poorer survival rate with a rapidly decreasing survival after 3 dpf especially for the TB MO KD, congruent with the timepoint of physiological Tfap2e upregulation. n=4; p<0.0001 (Mantel-Cox test). Ns, not significant; *p<0.05 **; p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001 (B, E: one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison). Number of investigated zfl n as indicated. Scale bar: 500 µm. KD, knockdown; TB, translation blocking; TFAP2E, transcription factor activator protein 2; zfl, zebrafish larvae.
The most striking phenotypes in our MO-KD zfl at 3 dpf were microcephaly, scoliosis and hypopigmentation (the latter was previously described by van Otterloo et al)14 (figure 2D). Only 24% of TB MO and 67% of e3i3 MO morphants showed normal healthy phenotype, compared with 90% of controls. Overexpression of TFAP2E with human wt mRNA in Ctrl MO zfl partly replicated the morphant phenotype: only 69% of these zfl remained unaffected after 3 dpf, compared with 90% of zfl treated only with Ctrl MO (figure 2E). Consequently, co-injection of wt human or zf mRNA in different concentrations on Tfap2e KD could not significantly rescue the number or features of phenotypical expression.
Interestingly, the survival rate of morphant zfl rapidly reduced from 3 dpf onwards, the timepoint of upregulated Tfap2e expression. TB MO showed a lower survival rate (16 %) compared with e3i3 MO (62 %) at 5 dpf, congruent with the manifestation of a more severe phenotype (figure 2F).
Depletion of Tfap2e in zfl leads to a syndromic phenotype with hydrocephalus, neuronal migration deficit, orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies, and microcephalyAs NCCs are necessary for neuronal and also non-neuronal tissue formation, that is, orofacial and maxillofacial cartilage, we investigated the morphology of these structures in 3 dpf zfl in the fluorescent neural crest reporter line Tg(sox10:mRFP). Morphants presented with a pathological formation of anterior NCCs in the orofacial and maxillofacial region at 3 dpf. The mRFP signal intensity was reduced from 1096 au/µm² (Ctrl MO) to 851 au/µm² (TB MO), indicative of disrupted expression of sox10 in the morphant neurocranium and viscerocranium (figure 3A,B). To further support these findings, we assessed Alcian blue cartilage staining of whole zfl. The Meckel’s cartilage, palatoquadrate, ceratohyal or hyosympletic bone showed severe defects after Tfap2e KD with almost complete penetrance (96 %) in TB MO and high penetrance (44 %) in e3i3 MO zfl. The size of the lower jaw was accordingly reduced from 415 µm (Ctrl MO) to 250 µm (TB MO) (figure 3C,D,E).
Figure 3Tfap2e KD is implicated in the disruption of neural crest-specific tissues. (A–B) Representative in vivo fluorescence imaging of the jaw of Tg(sox10:mRFP) zfl at 3 days post fertilisation (dpf) on Tfap2e KD and box plot graph of sox10:mRFP reporter-signal intensity. The dotted rectangle indicates the area that was chosen to measure the accumulated fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units (au)/µm2. Morphants present with a pathological formation and a reduced Sox10 signal at 3 dpf after Tfap2e KD, indicating neural crest cell disruption. (C–E) Representative Alcian blue cartilage staining of zfl at 3 dpf and simplified schematic of the developing zebrafish craniofacies (C), column graph of the percentage of zfl with orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies (D), and box plot graph of measured sizes of the lower jaw on Tfap2e KD (E). White brackets in (C) indicate the measured distance from the rostral end of the Meckel’s cartilage to the caudal point of the hyosympletic cartilage. On Tfap2e KD, we observed a reduced jaw size according to hypoplasia of relevant orofacial and maxillofacial structures including the Meckel’s cartilage (Mc), ceratohyal (ch), palatoquadrate (pq) and hyosympletic (hs). (F–G) Representative in vivo 2-photon microscopy of the spinal cord of Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) zfl on Tfap2e KD at 2 dpf and column graph of counted fluorescent neurons and their axons. The left panel is a close-up view and description of the analysed cell types. Note the strongly reduced number of DRG neurons in both morpholino (MO) KD groups. Additionally, central and peripheral axonal outgrowth of the remaining DRG neurons is impaired. **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 (B, E: unpaired t-test; D: one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison; G: two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison). Number of independent experiments n=3 for all graphs, number of investigated zfl n as indicated. White scale bars: 200 µm. White dotted scale bar: 50 µm. ANOVA, analysis of variance; CNS, central nervous system; DRG, dorsal root ganglia; KD, knockdown; TB, translation blocking; zfl, zebrafish larvae.
Assessment of trunk NCC migration was performed by in vivo imaging of DRG neurons and their precursor population RBSN in the spinal cord of Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) fluorescent reporter zfl at 2 dpf. The number of DRG neurons was drastically reduced in both groups (TB MO: 3.1, e3i3 MO: 4.9, Ctrl MO: 11.3 neurons). Remarkably, the remaining bipolar DRG neurons showed an impaired axonal outgrowth independent of the direction towards CNS or peripheral nervous system (PNS) (CNS - TB MO: 1.2; e3i3 MO 1.5; Ctrl MO: 9.6 axons / PNS - TB MO: 0.5; e3i3 MO 1.5; Ctrl MO: 8.5 axons) (figure 3F,G). However, manual counting of neuron somata did not reveal a significant alteration in RBSN population on MO KD (online supplemental data 12).
We further evaluated the CNS phenotype by in vivo 2-photon microscopy in Tg(−3.1.ngn1:GFP) KD zfl at 2 dpf. Therefore, we created a high-resolution 3D brain model from z-stack images of zfl treated with Ctrl MO, TB MO or e3i3 MO (figure 4A,B, online supplemental data 9, online supplemental videos 1–3). TB MO zfl presented with a significantly reduced brain volume (2.1 *106 µm³) compared with controls (3.6 *106 µm³). Interestingly, the brain volume of e3i3 MO treated zfl (3.2 *106 µm³) was not significantly reduced (online supplemental data 13). Furthermore, we could detect an obvious hydrocephalus visible through an enlarged forebrain hemisphere cleft in TB MO and e3i3 MO zfl (44 µm; 57 µm; Ctrl MO 19 µm) (figure 4A–C, online supplemental videos 1–3). To obtain further evidence that this hemisphere cleft is not a sign of a local structural malformation but of a general hydrocephalus, sulforhodamine 101 (SR101) injections were performed. In TB MO zfl an increased diameter of the rhombencephalic ventricle (2.4; Ctrl MO 1.7) and diencephalic ventricle (0.7; Ctrl MO 0.3) was observed (figure 4D,E). These findings were supported in a tfap2e KOCRISPR line crossed into Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP), showing a mild hydrocephalus in tfap2e+/- and tfap2e-/- zfl compared with wt littermates (online supplemental data 14). However, unlike Tfap2e KD zfl, KOCRISPR larvae did not exhibit a severe phenotype in brightfield imaging and only a subset of tfap2e+/- or tfap2e-/- zfl presented with variable hydrocephalus.
Figure 4Tfap2e KD is implicated in structural brain anomalies in the early developing zfl. (A–C) 3D modelling of the brain of Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) zfl on Tfap2e KD at 2 days post fertilisation (dpf) and box plot graph of the forebrain hemisphere cleft measured as indicated (white brackets). (A) shows a schematic depiction of zfl brain in transverse (left) and coronary view (right) (modified from Dworschak et al, 2021).28 Pink: olfactory blub. Turquoise: mesencephalon. Purple: rhombencephalon. (B) The representative images were obtained by in vivo 2-photon z–stack imaging and subsequent modulation with IMARIS software. Transverse (left) and coronary view (right). (C) TB MO and e3i3 morphant zfl present with an enlarged hemisphere cleft consistent with a hydrocephalus. Note that only TB MO but not e3i3 MO treated zfl show a reduced brain volume (see online supplemental data 13). (D–E) Representative confocal in vivo images of Tg(−3.1ngn1:GFP) zfl at 2 dpf in transverse view after sulforhodamine SR101 injection (in red) into the diencephalic ventricle and box plot graph of ventricle diameters (white brackets) in relation to hemisphere diameter (dotted line). In TB MO zfl, both the diencephalic and the rhombencephalic ventricle are enlarged in the sense of a hydrocephalus. ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 (C: one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison; E: two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison). Number of independent experiments n=3 for all graphs, number of investigated zfl n as indicated. White scale bars: 200 µm. ANOVA, analysis of variance; DV, diencephalic ventricle; KD, knockdown; MO, morpholino oligonucleotide; ns, not significant; RV, rhombencephalic ventricle; TB, translation blocking; TV telencephalic ventricle; zfl, zebrafish larvae.
DiscussionTFAP2E has not yet been described in the aetiology of human NDD or congenital anomalies. The individuals described here with heterozygous missense variants in the neural crest specifier TFAP2E showed a phenotypical spectrum of CNS, orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies that are associated with neural crest and neural plate border specification failures.30 31 Shared phenotypes of the seven individuals from five families comprise orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies as the most frequent phenotype (6/7), CNS anomalies (4/7) and NDD (2/5). All of these features are reminiscent of neurocristopathies. Interestingly, a well-characterised neurocristopathy, branchio-oculo-facial syndrome (MIM: 113620), is caused by heterozygous missense variants in the paralog TFAP2A.32 In a zebrafish model of melanophore differentiation a redundancy of Tfap2a and Tfap2e was shown, suggesting functional similarities. Here, we report for the first time the implication of TFAP2E in human congenital anomalies.
The finding of the c.337C>A TFAP2E variant segregating in affected family members over three generations (family B) provides strong evidence for our supposed implication of heterozygous TFAP2E variants with CNS, orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies. However, individual B-II:2 is also heterozygous for the c.337C>A variant but has no history of congenital CNS, orofacial and maxillofacial anomalies. Her neurological phenotype (ie, migraine and anxiety disorder) was not described in other individuals with TFAP2E variants and could likely be of non-genetic origin. Although we cannot provide evidence, we assume reduced penetrance for the c.337C>A variant in individual B-II:2. In fact, reduced penetrance is well described for many severe developmental defects and neurocristopathies, such as holoprosencephaly type 3 (MIM: 142945) or Waardenburg syndrome type 3 a (MIM: 277580). Additional human genetic evidence is provided by the de novo occurrence of a novel TFPA2E variant (c.682C>T) in one family (family D). Unfortunately, we could not assess for de novo occurrence in the other three families (families A, C and E). Nevertheless, in silico analysis of all variants predict a damaging effect on TFAP2E (figure 1G, table 2). Further support is given by our protein structure modelling (online supplemental data 6, online supplemental table 1).
Interestingly, 18 individuals with CNVs overlapping the TFAP2E locus ranging from 0.5 Mb to 16.7 Mb listed in DECIPHER show phenotypical similarities to the observed features in the individuals reported here with single nucleotide variants in TFAP2E, that is, NDD and craniofacial anomalies. Of course, due to the large size of these CNVs and the predicted tolerance to loss of function (pLI=0), the contribution of these CNVs to the observed phenotypes remains speculative (online supplemental table 2).
Our zebrafish data showed that KD of Tfap2e in zfl has multiple effects on NCC after neural plate border specification.13 Orofacial and maxillofacial structures are known to be highly dependent on NCCs that give rise to cartilage cells, that is, in the region of the anterior arches. The developmental stage of the zfl at 3 dpf is also called the ‘protruding-mouth stage’ as orofacial and maxillofacial development is promoted at this stage and zfl develop an open mouth.33 We show here that Tfap2e is significantly upregulated at this developmental stage (figu
留言 (0)